Literature DB >> 25151100

Tool morphology constrains the effects of tool use on body representations.

Luke E Miller1, Matthew R Longo2, Ayse P Saygin1.   

Abstract

What factors constrain whether tool use modulates the user's body representations? To date, studies on representational plasticity following tool use have primarily focused on the act of using the tool. Here, we investigated whether the tool's morphology also serves to constrain plasticity. In 2 experiments, we varied whether the tool was morphologically similar to a target body part (Experiment 1, hand; Experiment 2, arm). Participants judged the tactile distance between pairs of points applied to their tool-using target body surface and forehead (control surface) before and after tool use. We applied touch in 2 orientations, allowing us to quantify how tool use modulates the representation's shape. Significant representational plasticity in hand shape (increase in width, decrease in length) was found when the tool was morphologically similar to a hand (Experiment 1A), but not when the tool was arm-shaped (Experiment 1B). Conversely, significant representational plasticity was found on the arm when the tool was arm-shaped (Experiment 2B), but not when hand-shaped (Experiment 2A). Taken together, our results indicate that morphological similarity between the tool and the effector constrains tool-induced representational plasticity. The embodiment of tools may thus depend on a match-to-template process between tool morphology and representation of the body. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151100     DOI: 10.1037/a0037777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  36 in total

1.  Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

2.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.

Authors:  Elena Calzolari; Elena Azañón; Matthew Danvers; Giuseppe Vallar; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Different tool training induces specific effects on body metric representation.

Authors:  Daniele Romano; Elena Uberti; Pietro Caggiano; Gianna Cocchini; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Tactile distance anisotropy on the feet.

Authors:  Kelda Manser-Smith; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  No evidence for sex differences in tactile distance anisotropy.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Body maps in the infant brain.

Authors:  Peter J Marshall; Andrew N Meltzoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Are tools truly incorporated as an extension of the body representation?: Assessing the evidence for tool embodiment.

Authors:  Joshua D Bell; Kristen L Macuga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-23

9.  The wheelchair as a full-body tool extending the peripersonal space.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; Jean Paul Noel; Elisa Canzoneri; Olaf Blanke; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-18

10.  Perceptual and Conceptual Distortions of Implicit Hand Maps.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Stefania Mattioni; Nataşa Ganea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.