Literature DB >> 25150344

Intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures--does malreduction matter?

John T Riehl, Kenneth J Koval, Joshua R Langford, Mark W Munro, Stanley J Kupiszewski, George J Haidukewych.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Subtrochanteric femur fractures remain challenging injuries to treat. Historically, varus malreduction has been linked to the development of nonunion; however, there is a paucity of literature evaluating the impact of sagittal plane malreduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of coronal and sagittal plane malreductions on time to union of subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with an intramedullary device.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of all sub-trochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 32) treated at a single institution. Inclusion criteria consisted of: 1. 18 or more years of age, and 2. fracture stabilization using an intramedullary device. All patients included were followed to union or revision surgery. Radiographic evidence of healing was defined as bridging callus on three of four cortices on AP and lateral views. Delayed union was defined as lack of radiographic healing by 4 months postoperatively and nonunion as lack of healing by 6 months. The definition of malreduction was coronal or sagittal plane deformity greater than 10° at the fracture site.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 20 men and 15 women with an average age of 55 years (range 19 to 100 years). Mean clinical follow up was 7 months (range 3 to 18 months). Thirty-four of 35 fractures (97%) healed without need for additional surgery. Twenty-one of the 35 fractures (60%) healed within 4 months of surgery. Thirteen fractures (37%) had delayed union, and 1 (2.9%) developed nonunion requiring reoperation. Seven of 35 fractures (20.0%) had a malreduction of greater than 10°, defined as varus (2 fractures), flexion (4 fractures), or both (1 fracture). Of the seven fractures with a malreduction, all (100%) developed a delayed (6) or nonunion (1). Of the 28 fractures without malreduction, 21 (75%) healed within 4 months, 7 (25%) had a delayed union, and none had a nonunion. The presence of a malreduction greater than 10° in any plane resulted in a significantly higher rate of delayed or nonunion (p = 0.0005).
CONCLUSION: For patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated with an intramedullary device, malreduction in any plane of greater than 10° resulted in a significantly increased rate of delayed or nonunion or both.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)        ISSN: 2328-4633


  13 in total

1.  A review of atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures in Northern Ireland between 2010 and 2014.

Authors:  K J Donnelly; A Tucker; B Kerr; S McDonald; D S O'Longain; J D Acton
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-22

2.  Surgical results of atypical femoral fractures in long-term bisphosphonate and glucocorticoid users - Relationship between fracture reduction and bone union.

Authors:  Tomofumi Nishino; Kojiro Hyodo; Yukei Matsumoto; Yohei Yanagisawa; Tomohiro Yoshizawa; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-27

3.  Subtrochanteric femoral fractures: A case series of 194 patients treated with long and short intramedullary nails.

Authors:  Eugenio Jannelli; Cristina Ghia; Medetti Marta; Gianluigi Pasta; Alessandro Ivone; Ester Boggio; Gianluca Conza; Fabio Zanchini; Federico Alberto Grassi; Mario Mosconi
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-13

4.  CT based measurement of anatomical dimensions of femur and its relevance in nail designs for proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Mahesh Kulkarni; Monappa Naik A; Chethan B Shetty; Samir M Paruthikunnan; Sharath K Rao
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-12-10

5.  Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: update.

Authors:  Paulo Roberto Barbosa de Toledo Lourenço; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-03-21

6.  Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Bernhard Wolf; Dietmar Dammerer; Martin Thaler; Peter Schwendinger; Richard A Lindtner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  [Effectiveness analysis of closed or limited open reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of Seinsheimer type Ⅴ subtrochanteric fracture].

Authors:  Xiaoke Yao; Lingna Wu; Jianhua Li; Wengang Huang; Xin Duan; Zuchao Gu; Yue Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15

8.  Nonunion of subtrochanteric fractures: Comminution or Malreduction.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Park; Gyu Min Kong; Byeong Ho Ha; Jun Ho Park; Kun Hyung Kim
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Demineralized Bone Matrix Add-On for Acceleration of Bone Healing in Atypical Subtrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Consecutive Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Noratep Kulachote; Paphon Sa-ngasoongsong; Norachart Sirisreetreerux; Pongsthorn Chanplakorn; Praman Fuangfa; Chanyut Suphachatwong; Wiwat Wajanavisit
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  What is the fracture displacement influence to fracture non-union in intramedullary nail treatment in subtrochanteric fracture?

Authors:  Liangjun Jiang; Qiang Zheng; Zhijun Pan
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.