Literature DB >> 32042232

CT based measurement of anatomical dimensions of femur and its relevance in nail designs for proximal femoral fractures.

Mahesh Kulkarni1, Monappa Naik A1, Chethan B Shetty1, Samir M Paruthikunnan2, Sharath K Rao1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to obtain computed tomography (CT) based measurements of femoral dimensions in adults, to identify its relevance with intramedullary nails used in the management of proximal femur fractures and to suggest a best fitting implant dimensions to our population. To best of our knowledge our study would be first to compile different CT based dimension in single study.
METHODS: In our retrospective study of 50 femurs, CT based femoral dimensions measured in standardized cuts and compared with previous studies and commonly available proximal femur intramedullary devices.
RESULTS: 68.4 was the mean age in our study, neck shaft angle (NSA) was 127.2±5.20, anteversion 11.2±7.40, endosteal isthmus diameter was 11.9 ± 1.7 mm, anterior radius of curvature (ROC) was 116.8 ± 20 mm, horizontal femoral offset 37.5 ± 4.6 mm, medio-lateral angle 7.8±1.60, with good inter and intra observer correlation. Femoral length and neck width was positively correlated to head diameter, horizontal femoral offset with medio-lateral (ML) angle. One of the 50 femur studied had the parameters in the range of available implant and could match appropriately.
CONCLUSION: CT based dimensions in our population is different from other population. Based on this study, a design modification of nails used in present day management of proximal femur fractures has been recommended.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anteversion; CT; Femoral dimension; Implant mismatch; Intramedullary nail; Neck shaft angle; Proximal femur fractures

Year:  2019        PMID: 32042232      PMCID: PMC7000424          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  23 in total

1.  A study of Korean femoral geometry.

Authors:  Gon Khang; Kuiwon Choi; Cheol-Sang Kim; Jong Soo Yang; Tae-Soo Bae
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The neck shaft angle: CT reference values of 800 adult hips.

Authors:  Christoph Kolja Boese; Janine Jostmeier; Johannes Oppermann; Jens Dargel; De-Hua Chang; Peer Eysel; Philipp Lechler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Controversies in Intramedullary Fixation for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Authors:  Paul C Baldwin; Randy C Lavender; Roy Sanders; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Outcome of traumatic subtrochanteric femoral fractures fixed using cephalo-medullary nails.

Authors:  Sourav Shukla; Phillip Johnston; M A Ahmad; Henry Wynn-Jones; A D Patel; N P Walton
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Variation in the femoral bow: a novel high-throughput analysis of 3922 femurs on cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Joseph Maratt; Peter L Schilling; Sven Holcombe; Ryan Dougherty; Ryan Murphy; Stewart C Wang; James A Goulet
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs.

Authors:  D Dimitriou; T-Y Tsai; B Yue; H E Rubash; Y-M Kwon; G Li
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Prediction of incident hip fracture by femoral neck bone mineral density and neck-shaft angle: a 5-year longitudinal study in post-menopausal females.

Authors:  S Gnudi; E Sitta; E Pignotti
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.

Authors:  Conor Kleweno; Jordan Morgan; James Redshaw; Mitchel Harris; Edward Rodriguez; David Zurakowski; Mark Vrahas; Paul Appleton
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population.

Authors:  Br Rawal; Rahul Ribeiro; Rajesh Malhotra; Naresh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Assessment of the geometry of proximal femur for short cephalomedullary nail placement: An observational study in dry femora and living subjects.

Authors:  Devendra Pathrot; Rehan Ul Haq; Aditya N Aggarwal; Mahindra Nagar; Shuchi Bhatt
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

View more
  3 in total

1.  Convenient design method for customized implants based on bionic vein structure features.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Weizhong Geng; Kunjin He; Kaijin Guo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-12

2.  Morphometric Analysis of the Proximal Femur With Its Clinical Correlation in Eastern Uttar Pradesh Region.

Authors:  Mayank Gupta; Deepa Devadas; Chetan Sahni; Amit Nayak; Praveen K Tiwari; Anand Mishra
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-04

3.  Bone morphological feature extraction for customized bone plate design.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Kaijin Guo; Kunjin He; Hong Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.