Literature DB >> 30449978

What is the fracture displacement influence to fracture non-union in intramedullary nail treatment in subtrochanteric fracture?

Liangjun Jiang1, Qiang Zheng1, Zhijun Pan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The fracture displacement in intramedullary nail in femoral subtrochanteric fracture may cause fracture non-union. We retrospectively analysed our recent experience to clear the influence about fracture displacement in intramedullary nail in femoral subtrochanteric fracture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study includes 36 patients in the intramedullary nail group followed up for more than 12 months; these patients suffered from femoral subtrochanteric fracture from 2009.1-2014.12 in our hospital. The operation time, amount of bleeding, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris function score of hip joint, fracture displacement, TAD and postoperative complications were summarized.
RESULTS: The average follow up time was 20.2 months, average operation time was 126 min, average amount of bleeding was 258 ml, average hospitalization was 13.1 days, average fracture healing time was 6.8 months, average fracture displacement was 1.23 cm, average TAD was 19.7 mm and average hip Harris function score was 82.5 points. Five cases suffered non-union. Only the fracture displacement degree made significant correlation with fracture non-union. All union patients had a fracture displacement less than 2.2 cm and all non-union patients had a fracture displacement more than 2.5 cm.
CONCLUSION: Intramedullary nail treatment must focus on fracture reduction and recovery of femoral medial support with assisted incision technique or closed cerclage wire technique when necessary. In our opinions, only the fracture displacement degree made significant correlation with bone non-union and all cases achieved bone union when it less than 2.2 cm according to our statistics. But it still need further research to find out the displacement of fracture fragments could be tolerant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intramedullary nail; Subtrochanteric fracture

Year:  2018        PMID: 30449978      PMCID: PMC6224685          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  21 in total

1.  Considerations with failed intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femur fractures: how to treat, revise, and replace.

Authors:  Daniel Dziadosz
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 2.  Biomechanical characteristics and surgical management of subtrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  J W Fielding; G V Cochran; R E Zickel
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Thorben Müller; Tobias Topp; Christian A Kühne; Gershon Gebhart; Steffen Ruchholtz; Ralph Zettl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Minimally invasive clamp-assisted reduction and cephalomedullary nailing without cerclage cables for subtrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: Surgical technique and results.

Authors:  Juan Mingo-Robinet; Miguel Torres-Torres; María Moreno-Barrero; Juan Antonio Alonso; Sara García-González
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Treatment of complex subtrochanteric fracture with the long gamma AP locking nail: a prospective evaluation of 64 cases.

Authors:  Ming-Te Cheng; Fang-Yao Chiu; Tien-Yow Chuang; Chuan-Mu Chen; Tain-Hsiung Chen; Pui-Ching Lee
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-02

Review 6.  Risk factors for long bone fracture non-union: a stratification approach based on the level of the existing scientific evidence.

Authors:  Emmanuele Santolini; Robert West; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  F Seinsheimer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric femur fractures.

Authors:  Paul R T Kuzyk; Mohit Bhandari; Michael D McKee; Thomas A Russell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Circumferential wires as a supplement to intramedullary nailing in unstable trochanteric hip fractures: 4 reoperations in 60 patients followed for 1 year.

Authors:  Ilija Ban; Lasse Birkelund; Henrik Palm; Michael Brix; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Factors Affecting Time to Bony Union of Femoral Subtrochanteric Fractures Treated with Intramedullary Devices.

Authors:  Jung-Yoon Choi; Yerl-Bo Sung; Jin-Hee Yoo; Sung-Jae Chung
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2014-06-30
View more
  2 in total

1.  Intramedullary Nail Breakage and Mechanical Displacement in Patients with Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database Analysis.

Authors:  Abhishek S Chitnis; Bidusee Ray; Charisse Sparks; Yuriy Grebenyuk; Mollie Vanderkarr; Chantal E Holy
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-02-09

2.  [Effectiveness of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus Intertan intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture with incomplete lateral wall].

Authors:  Zhangxin Chen; Cuiyu Hu; Zhenhua Zheng; Huixiang Jiang; Mingming Gao; Benwen Wu; Guofeng Huang; Zhenqi Ding
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-09-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.