Literature DB >> 25150143

Discordance of gravity line and C7PL in patient with adult spinal deformity--factors affecting the occiput-trunk sagittal discordance.

Mitsuru Yagi1, Kotaro Takeda2, Masafumi Machida3, Takashi Asazuma4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: During quiet standing, the gravity line (GL) can be located according to the sum of the ground reaction forces (GRFs) measured with a force platform. C7 plumb line (C7PL) is an easy method to estimate sagittal trunk balance, but discordance between C7PL and the GL is widely recognized. However, the prevalence of occiput-trunk (O-T) discordance (GL-C7PL>3 cm) and the factors affecting this type of discordance have not yet been determined.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence of O-T discordance in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and identify the factors affecting this type of discordance. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective consecutive case series of ASD. PATIENT SAMPLE: This retrospective case series included 300 consecutive ASD patients. The inclusion criteria were age more than 50 years, Cobb angle of the main curve more than 20°, and C7PL more than 5 cm. The exclusion criteria consisted of inappropriate radiography; syndromic, neuromuscular, or other pathologic conditions; and previous joint replacement. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures included self-reported (Scoliosis Research Society 22 and Oswestry disability index [ODI]) and radiographic measures.
METHODS: In a retrospective consecutive case series, demographic and radiographic patient data were reviewed. Demographic data included age, gender, curve type, SRS22, and ODI. Radiographic data included GL, C7PL, C2-C7, T2-T5, T5-T12, T10-L2, T2 tilt, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacrum slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI). Global sagittal and spinopelvic alignments were also reviewed. Patients were categorized in either a O-T concordance (C group, GL-C7PL<3 cm) or a O-T discordance (D group, GL-C7PL more than +3 cm) group, and the demographic, radiographic, and clinical outcome data were compared between these groups. One-way analysis of variance, correlation coefficient tests, and multiple regression and logistic regression analyses were performed for statistical analysis. p Value less than .01 was considered statistically significant. Force platform analysis was performed to assess the relationship among GRF, GL, and C7PL.
RESULTS: Among 300 consecutive ASD patients, 72 (24%) were categorized in the D group. There was no significant difference in terms of demographic data between the C and D groups. The SRS and ODI of patients with GL more than 10 cm were significantly lower than those of patients with GL less than 10 cm. Comparisons of regional sagittal alignment showed significantly higher T5-T12 values in the D group, and multiple regression analysis revealed significant correlations among T2-T5, T5-T12, and GL-C7PL. In contrast, the analysis of global sagittal alignment revealed a significantly large T2 sagittal tilt in the D group compared with the C group. Force platform analysis showed concordance between GRF and GL, whereas discordance was observed between GRF and C7PL. The D group could be classified into 2 groups based on the global sagittal alignment: 10 patients were classified as the hypo-compensation type (small SVA, small CL, small TK, and normal-to-small LL), whereas 62 were classified as the forward-leaning type (large sagittal vertical axis, large cervical lordosis, large thoracic kyphosis, and small LL).
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of discordance between GL and C7PL in ASD patients was 24%, and thoracic kyphosis and global sagittal alignment were significantly correlated with this discordance. The concordance of GRF and GL and the discordance of GRF and C7PL highlight the importance and necessity of accounting for GL when considering surgical treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Balance; Ground reaction force; Kyphosis; Sagittal alignment; Scoliosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25150143     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  5 in total

1.  Walking sagittal balance correction by pedicle subtraction osteotomy in adults with fixed sagittal imbalance.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Shinjiro Kaneko; Yoshiyuki Yato; Takashi Asazuma; Masafumi Machida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

Authors:  Fong Poh Ling; T Chevillotte; A Leglise; W Thompson; C Bouthors; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  How Cervical Reconstruction Surgery Affects Global Spinal Alignment.

Authors:  Jun Mizutani; Russell Strom; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Kenji Endo; Ken Ishii; Mitsuru Yagi; Bobby Tay; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Knee Extension Is Related to the Posteriorly Deviated Gravity Line to the Pelvis in Young Adults: Radiographic Analysis Using Low-Dose Biplanar X-ray.

Authors:  Jun Young Park; Byung Woo Cho; Hyuck Min Kwon; Kwan Kyu Park; Woo-Suk Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.052

5.  Evaluation of Global Sagittal Balance in Koreans Adults.

Authors:  Yongjae Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2017-08-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.