Literature DB >> 29718359

How Cervical Reconstruction Surgery Affects Global Spinal Alignment.

Jun Mizutani1,2, Russell Strom2, Kuniyoshi Abumi3, Kenji Endo4, Ken Ishii5,6, Mitsuru Yagi5,7, Bobby Tay8, Vedat Deviren8, Christopher Ames2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been no reports describing how cervical reconstruction surgery affects global spinal alignment (GSA).
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effects of cervical reconstruction for GSA through a retrospective multicenter study.
METHODS: Seventy-eight patients who underwent cervical reconstruction surgery for cervical kyphosis were divided into a Head-balanced group (n = 42) and a Trunk-balanced group (n = 36) according to the values of the C7 plumb line (PL). We also divided the patients into a cervical sagittal balanced group (CSB group, n = 18) and a cervical sagittal imbalanced group (CSI group, n = 60) based on the C2 PL-C7 PL distance. Various sagittal Cobb angles and the sagittal vertical axes were measured before and after surgery.
RESULTS: Cervical alignment was improved to achieve occiput-trunk concordance (the distance between the center of gravity [COG] PL, which is considered the virtual gravity line of the entire body, and C7 PL < 30 mm) despite the location of COG PL and C7PL. A subsequent significant change in thoracolumbar alignment was observed in Head-balanced and CSI groups. However, no such significant change was observed in Trunk-balanced and CSB groups. We observed 1 case of transient and 1 case of residual neurological worsening.
CONCLUSION: The primary goal of cervical reconstruction surgery is to achieve occiput-trunk concordance. Once it is achieved, subsequent thoracolumbar alignment changes occur as needed to harmonize GSA. Cervical reconstruction can restore both cervical deformity and GSA. However, surgeons must consider the risks and benefits in such challenging cases. © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical kyphotic deformity; Cervical spine reconstruction; Global spinal alignment; Occiput-trunk concordance; Sagittal vertical axis; Spinal deformity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29718359      PMCID: PMC6417912          DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  26 in total

1.  One-stage posterior decompression and reconstruction of the cervical spine by using pedicle screw fixation systems.

Authors:  K Abumi; K Kaneda; Y Shono; M Fujiya
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 2.  Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: A review.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Justin S Smith; Justin K Scheer; Shay Bess; S Samuel Bederman; Vedat Deviren; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-03-23

3.  Discordance of gravity line and C7PL in patient with adult spinal deformity--factors affecting the occiput-trunk sagittal discordance.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Kotaro Takeda; Masafumi Machida; Takashi Asazuma
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Sohrab Gollogly; Olivier Noseda; Eric Berthonnaud; Johanes Dimnet
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis.

Authors:  C Boulay; C Tardieu; J Hecquet; C Benaim; B Mouilleseaux; C Marty; D Prat-Pradal; J Legaye; G Duval-Beaupère; J Pélissier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Global Spinal Alignment in Cervical Kyphotic Deformity: The Importance of Head Position and Thoracolumbar Alignment in the Compensatory Mechanism.

Authors:  Jun Mizutani; Kushagra Verma; Kenji Endo; Ken Ishii; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Mitsuru Yagi; Naobumi Hosogane; Jeffrey Yang; Bobby Tay; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Outcomes after surgery for cervical spine deformity: review of the literature.

Authors:  Arnold B Etame; Anthony C Wang; Khoi D Than; Frank La Marca; Paul Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; D A Tannenbaum; G P Graziano; R T Loder; R N Hensinger
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery.

Authors:  Yoon Ha; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Gregory Mundis; Christopher Shaffrey; Justin Smith; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Spinopelvic sagittal alignment on the surgical outcomes of dropped head syndrome: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kudo; Tomoaki Toyone; Kenji Endo; Yuji Matsuoka; Ichiro Okano; Koji Ishikawa; Akira Matsuoka; Hiroshi Maruyama; Ryo Yamamura; Haruka Emori; Soji Tani; Toshiyuki Shirahata; Chikara Hayakawa; Yushi Hoshino; Tomoyuki Ozawa; Hidekazu Suzuki; Takato Aihara; Kazuma Murata; Taichiro Takamatsu; Katsunori Inagaki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.