Literature DB >> 25148761

Factors that affect consultation and screening for fecal incontinence.

Lalitha Kunduru1, Sung Min Kim1, Steve Heymen1, William E Whitehead2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Fecal incontinence (FI) affects 15% of people age 70 years and older, but only 10% to 30% discuss FI with their physicians. We aimed to identify barriers that prevent people from consulting with their physicians, and that prevent physicians from screening for FI.
METHODS: We performed structured interviews of 124 individuals with FI (mean age, 56 y; 87.9% women) recruited from 6 medical offices at the University of North Carolina Hospitals from June 2012 through March 2013. The subjects completed the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale questionnaires. Interview questions aimed to determine which patients had consulted physicians for FI. Eleven of the 56 physicians with patients included in the study responded to the survey.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight of the 124 participants consulted with their physicians about FI (consulters). These individuals had a higher incidence of depression than the 36 subjects who did not consult with their physicians about FI (nonconsulters; P = .04), but similar Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores. A smaller proportion of nonconsulters were aware of available treatments than consulters (P < .01). Fifty-six percent of nonconsulters said their FI was not serious enough to consult a physician. There was no difference between consulters and nonconsulters in embarrassment in talking about FI. Among consulters, 88% initiated the conversation about FI with their physician. Seven of the 11 responding physicians screened for FI, but only screened high-risk patients. The 4 physicians who did not screen for FI were unaware of its prevalence, viewed FI as a low priority, or stated that patients were responsible for reporting their own symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on surveys of physicians and patients, many patients have insufficient knowledge about the availability and effectiveness of treatments for FI. Some people with FI do not discuss it with their physician because their symptoms are mild, and most prefer physicians to ask them directly about FI. Educating patients and physicians about the prevalence of FI and management strategies may improve consultation rates.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accidental Bowel Leakage; FIQOL; FISI; Fecal Incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25148761      PMCID: PMC4842025          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  9 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Alan R Zinsmeister; G Richard Locke; Barbara M Seide; Kimberly McKeon; Cathy D Schleck; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Fecal incontinence in US women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Melville; Ming-Yu Fan; Katherine Newton; Dee Fenner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Fecal incontinence in primary care: prevalence, diagnosis, and health care utilization.

Authors:  Gena C Dunivan; Steve Heymen; Olafur S Palsson; Michael von Korff; Marsha J Turner; Jennifer L Melville; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  The perspective of the patient.

Authors:  Nancy J Norton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction.

Authors:  J F Johanson; J Lafferty
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  William E Whitehead; Lori Borrud; Patricia S Goode; Susan Meikle; Elizabeth R Mueller; Ashok Tuteja; Alison Weidner; Milena Weinstein; Wen Ye
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 22.682

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Fecal incontinence in irritable bowel syndrome: Prevalence and associated factors in Swedish and American patients.

Authors:  M Simrén; O S Palsson; S Heymen; A Bajor; H Törnblom; W E Whitehead
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Barriers to seeking care for accidental bowel leakage: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Heidi Wendell Brown; Rebecca G Rogers; Meg E Wise
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A systematic review of non-invasive modalities used to identify women with anal incontinence symptoms after childbirth.

Authors:  Thomas G Gray; Holly Vickers; Swati Jha; Georgina L Jones; Steven R Brown; Stephen C Radley
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Gena Dunivan; Patricia S Goode; Emily S Lukacz; Alayne D Markland; Catherine A Matthews; Louise Mott; Rebecca G Rogers; Alan R Zinsmeister; William E Whitehead; Satish S C Rao; Frank A Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Validation of an instrument to assess barriers to care-seeking for accidental bowel leakage in women: the BCABL questionnaire.

Authors:  Heidi Wendell Brown; Meg E Wise; Danielle Westenberg; Nicholas B Schmuhl; Kelly Lewis Brezoczky; Rebecca G Rogers; Melissa L Constantine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Biofeedback therapy for anorectal functional disorder: Malaysian colorectal tertiary centre experience.

Authors:  Saidah Sahid; Muhd Yusairi Bin Kamarulzaman; Johari Bin Mustafa; Nik Amin Sahid; Nil Amri Bin Mohamed Kamil
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-25

7.  Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation: Can urologists impact this gap in care?

Authors:  Dena Moskowitz; Sarah A Adelstein; Alvaro Lucioni; Kathleen C Kobashi; Una J Lee
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-01-01

8.  If We Don't Ask, They Won't Tell: Screening for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence by Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Heidi W Brown; Wen Guan; Nicholas B Schmuhl; Paul D Smith; William E Whitehead; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 9.  Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.

Authors:  Trisha Pasricha; Kyle Staller
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.076

10.  Psychometric evaluation of a newly developed Elderly-Constipation Impact Scale.

Authors:  Patimah Abdul Wahab; Dariah Mohd Yusoff; Azidah Abdul Kadir; Siti Hawa Ali; Yeong Yeh Lee; Yee Cheng Kueh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.