Literature DB >> 30201674

If We Don't Ask, They Won't Tell: Screening for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence by Primary Care Providers.

Heidi W Brown1, Wen Guan2, Nicholas B Schmuhl2, Paul D Smith2, William E Whitehead2, Rebecca G Rogers2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than half of older adults experience urinary (UI) or fecal incontinence (FI), but the majority have never discussed symptoms with health care providers. Little is known about primary care providers' (PCPs') screening for UI and FI.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of PCPs within a Midwest academic institution to ascertain and compare PCPs' beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors regarding screening and treatment for UI and FI; determine factors associated with screening for FI; and identify potential barriers to and facilitators of FI screening and treatment.
RESULTS: Among 154 PCPs, the screening rate for UI (75%) was more than double that for FI (35%; P < .001). PCPs believed that both UI and FI screening were important but felt better informed to treat UI (P < .001). Screening for FI was associated with UI screening (OR, 11.27; 95% CI, 4.9-26.0; P < .001); feeling informed to treat FI (OR, 10.21; 95% CI, 1.2-90.0; P = .01); screening verbally (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.9-8.0; P < .001); perceiving screening as important (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.8-7.4; P < .001); using the term, "accidental bowel leakage" (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.7; P = .02) or "bowel control issues" (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.5; P = .03); and being a resident (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.82; P = .02). PCPs reported high interest in patient and provider educational materials about UI and FI.
CONCLUSIONS: Most PCPs screen for UI but not FI. High reported interest in educational materials, coupled with high reported rates of perceived importance of screening for UI and FI, suggests that PCPs welcome informative interventions to streamline diagnosis and treatment. © Copyright 2018 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross Sectional Analysis; Fecal Incontinence; Primary Health Care; Surveys and Questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30201674      PMCID: PMC6170156          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  28 in total

1.  Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Alan R Zinsmeister; G Richard Locke; Barbara M Seide; Kimberly McKeon; Cathy D Schleck; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Association between the Geriatric Giants of urinary incontinence and falls in older people using data from the Leicestershire MRC Incontinence Study.

Authors:  Anne L Foley; Shankar Loharuka; James A Barrett; Ruth Mathews; Kate Williams; Catherine W McGrother; Brenda H Roe
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Survey of geriatricians on the effect of fecal incontinence on nursing home referral.

Authors:  Madhusudan Grover; Jan Busby-Whitehead; Mary H Palmer; Steve Heymen; Olafur S Palsson; Patricia S Goode; Marsha Turner; William E Whitehead
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Barriers to seeking care for accidental bowel leakage: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Heidi Wendell Brown; Rebecca G Rogers; Meg E Wise
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Medically recognized urinary incontinence and risks of hospitalization, nursing home admission and mortality.

Authors:  D H Thom; M N Haan; S K Van Den Eeden
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Primary care providers' experience, management, and referral patterns regarding pelvic floor disorders: A national survey.

Authors:  Donna Mazloomdoost; Catrina C Crisp; Steven D Kleeman; Rachel N Pauls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  It's the way you ask that matters: comparison of data relating to prevalence of incontinence aid use from two surveys of people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Brian Buckley
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.741

8.  Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  William E Whitehead; Lori Borrud; Patricia S Goode; Susan Meikle; Elizabeth R Mueller; Ashok Tuteja; Alison Weidner; Milena Weinstein; Wen Ye
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Increasing Discussion Rates of Incontinence in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sophia Miryam Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose; Ronald E Gangnon; Betty Chewning; Arnold Wald
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Identifying the quality of life effects of urinary incontinence with depression in an Australian population.

Authors:  Jodie C Avery; Nigel P Stocks; Paul Duggan; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Anne W Taylor; Robert D Goldney; Alastair H MacLennan
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Exploring literature on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices towards urinary incontinence management: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anika Janse van Vuuren; J A van Rensburg; Lonese Jacobs; Susan Hanekom
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Functional bowel disorders with diarrhoea: Clinical guidelines of the United European Gastroenterology and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Fabiana Zingone; Brigida Barberio; Giovanni Marasco; Filiz Akyuz; Hale Akpinar; Oana Barboi; Giorgia Bodini; Serhat Bor; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Gheorghe Cristian; Maura Corsetti; Antonio Di Sabatino; Anca Mirela Dimitriu; Vasile Drug; Dan L Dumitrascu; Alexander C Ford; Goran Hauser; Radislav Nakov; Nisha Patel; Daniel Pohl; Cătălin Sfarti; Jordi Serra; Magnus Simrén; Alina Suciu; Jan Tack; Murat Toruner; Julian Walters; Cesare Cremon; Giovanni Barbara
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.866

3.  Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration.

Authors:  Sadé L Assmann; Daniel Keszthelyi; Jos Kleijnen; Foteini Anastasiou; Elissa Bradshaw; Ann E Brannigan; Emma V Carrington; Giuseppe Chiarioni; Liora D A Ebben; Marc A Gladman; Yasuko Maeda; Jarno Melenhorst; Giovanni Milito; Jean W M Muris; Julius Orhalmi; Daniel Pohl; Yvonne Tillotson; Mona Rydningen; Saulius Svagzdys; Carolynne J Vaizey; Stephanie O Breukink
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 6.866

4.  Cebranopadol reduces cocaine self-administration in male rats: Dose, treatment and safety consideration.

Authors:  Huimei Wei; Ting Zhang; Chang-Guo Zhan; Fang Zheng
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  Prevalence and Associated Factors of Fecal Incontinence and Double Incontinence among Rural Elderly in North China.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Kai Wang; Ping Zou; Xiaomei Li; Jinjie He; Jing Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.