PURPOSE: Iodine-131-m-iodobenzylguanidine ([(131)I]mIBG)-targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is a standard treatment for recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma with response rates of 30-40 %. The aim of this study is to demonstrate patient-specific dosimetry using quantitative [(124)I]mIBG positron emission tomography/X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with a GEometry ANd Tracking 4 (Geant4)-based Monte Carlo method for better treatment planning. PROCEDURES: A Monte Carlo dosimetry method was developed using the Geant4 toolkit with voxelized anatomical geometry and source distribution as input. The presegmented hybrid computational human phantoms developed by the University of Florida and the National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) were used as a surrogate to characterize the anatomy of a given patient. S values for I-131 were estimated by the phantoms coupled with Geant4 and compared with those estimated by OLINDA|EXM and MCNPX for the newborn model. To obtain patient-specific biodistribution of [(131)I]mIBG, a 10-year-old girl with relapsed neuroblastoma was imaged with [(124)I]mIBG PET/CT at four time points prior to the planned [(131)I]mIBG TRT. The organ- and tumor-absorbed doses of the clinical case were estimated with the Geant4 method using the modified UF/NCI 10-year-old phantom with tumors and the patient-specific residence time. RESULTS: For the newborn model, the Geant4 S values were consistent with the MCNPX S values. The S value ratio of the Geant4 method to OLINDA|EXM ranged from 0.08 to 6.5 of all major organs. The [(131)I]mIBG residence time quantified from the pretherapy [(124)I]mIBG PET/CT imaging of the 10-year-old patient was mostly comparable to those previously reported. Organ-absorbed dose for the salivary glands was 98.0 Gy, heart wall 36.5 Gy, and liver 34.3 Gy, while tumor-absorbed dose ranged from 143.9 to 1,641.3 Gy in different sites. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific dosimetry for [(131)I]mIBG TRT was accomplished using pretherapy [(124)I]mIBG PET/CT imaging and a Geant4-based Monte Carlo dosimetry method. The Geant4 method with quantitative pretherapy imaging can provide dose estimates to normal organs and tumors with more realistic simulation geometry, and thus may improve treatment planning for [(131)I]mIBG TRT.
PURPOSE:Iodine-131-m-iodobenzylguanidine ([(131)I]mIBG)-targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is a standard treatment for recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma with response rates of 30-40 %. The aim of this study is to demonstrate patient-specific dosimetry using quantitative [(124)I]mIBG positron emission tomography/X-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging with a GEometry ANd Tracking 4 (Geant4)-based Monte Carlo method for better treatment planning. PROCEDURES: A Monte Carlo dosimetry method was developed using the Geant4 toolkit with voxelized anatomical geometry and source distribution as input. The presegmented hybrid computational human phantoms developed by the University of Florida and the National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) were used as a surrogate to characterize the anatomy of a given patient. S values for I-131 were estimated by the phantoms coupled with Geant4 and compared with those estimated by OLINDA|EXM and MCNPX for the newborn model. To obtain patient-specific biodistribution of [(131)I]mIBG, a 10-year-old girl with relapsed neuroblastoma was imaged with [(124)I]mIBGPET/CT at four time points prior to the planned [(131)I]mIBG TRT. The organ- and tumor-absorbed doses of the clinical case were estimated with the Geant4 method using the modified UF/NCI 10-year-old phantom with tumors and the patient-specific residence time. RESULTS: For the newborn model, the Geant4 S values were consistent with the MCNPX S values. The S value ratio of the Geant4 method to OLINDA|EXM ranged from 0.08 to 6.5 of all major organs. The [(131)I]mIBG residence time quantified from the pretherapy [(124)I]mIBGPET/CT imaging of the 10-year-old patient was mostly comparable to those previously reported. Organ-absorbed dose for the salivary glands was 98.0 Gy, heart wall 36.5 Gy, and liver 34.3 Gy, while tumor-absorbed dose ranged from 143.9 to 1,641.3 Gy in different sites. CONCLUSIONS:Patient-specific dosimetry for [(131)I]mIBG TRT was accomplished using pretherapy [(124)I]mIBGPET/CT imaging and a Geant4-based Monte Carlo dosimetry method. The Geant4 method with quantitative pretherapy imaging can provide dose estimates to normal organs and tumors with more realistic simulation geometry, and thus may improve treatment planning for [(131)I]mIBG TRT.
Authors: Youngho Seo; W Clay Gustafson; Shorouk F Dannoon; Erin A Nekritz; Chang-Lae Lee; Stephanie T Murphy; Henry F VanBrocklin; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; William A Weiss; Katherine K Matthay Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Stephanie Lamart; Andre Bouville; Steven L Simon; Keith F Eckerman; Dunstana Melo; Choonsik Lee Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Katherine K Matthay; Jessica C Tan; Judith G Villablanca; Gregory A Yanik; Janet Veatch; Benjamin Franc; Eilish Twomey; Biljana Horn; C Patrick Reynolds; Susan Groshen; Robert C Seeger; John M Maris Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Chang-Lae Lee; Hilla Wahnishe; George A Sayre; Hyo-Min Cho; Hee-Joung Kim; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Randall A Hawkins; Shorouk F Dannoon; Henry F VanBrocklin; Melissa Itsara; William A Weiss; Xiaodong Yang; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Katherine K Matthay; Youngho Seo Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Katherine K Matthay; Brian Weiss; Judith G Villablanca; John M Maris; Gregory A Yanik; Steven G Dubois; James Stubbs; Susan Groshen; Denice Tsao-Wei; Randall Hawkins; Hollie Jackson; Fariba Goodarzian; Heike Daldrup-Link; Ashok Panigrahy; Alexander Towbin; Hiroyuki Shimada; John Barrett; Norman Lafrance; John Babich Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Michael Wayson; Choonsik Lee; George Sgouros; S Ted Treves; Eric Frey; Wesley E Bolch Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Maxim A Moroz; Inna Serganova; Pat Zanzonico; Ludmila Ageyeva; Tatiana Beresten; Ekaterina Dyomina; Eva Burnazi; Ronald D Finn; Michael Doubrovin; Ronald G Blasberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Zvi Bar-Sever; Lorenzo Biassoni; Barry Shulkin; Grace Kong; Michael S Hofman; Egesta Lopci; Irina Manea; Jacek Koziorowski; Rita Castellani; Ariane Boubaker; Bieke Lambert; Thomas Pfluger; Helen Nadel; Susan Sharp; Francesco Giammarile Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Youngho Seo; Yoonsuk Huh; Shih-Ying Huang; J Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Randall A Hawkins; W Clay Gustafson; Kieuhoa T Vo; Katherine K Matthay Journal: Med Phys Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Manuel Weber; Jochen Schmitz; Ines Maric; Kim Pabst; Lale Umutlu; Martin Walz; Ken Herrmann; Christoph Rischpler; Frank Weber; Walter Jentzen; Sarah Theurer; Thorsten D Poeppel; Nicole Unger; Wolfgang P Fendler Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Megan Trieu; Steven G DuBois; Elizabeth Pon; Lorenzo Nardo; Randall A Hawkins; Araz Marachelian; Clare J Twist; Julie R Park; Katherine K Matthay Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Mariam S Aboian; Shih-Ying Huang; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Randall A Hawkins; Henry F VanBrocklin; Yoonsuk Huh; Kieuhoa T Vo; W Clay Gustafson; Katherine K Matthay; Youngho Seo Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 11.082