Literature DB >> 17110390

Specific absorbed fraction for Korean adult voxel phantom from internal photon source.

C Lee1, S Park, J K Lee.   

Abstract

Absorbed fraction (AF) and specific absorbed fraction (SAF) are crucial values for the calculation of radionuclide S-values and consequently for internal dose estimates. The formalism of the Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) has been utilised as a standard in the calculation of individual organ doses for biologically distributed radionuclides and for different types of radiation. Although those quantities are highly sensitive to individual anatomical difference, the SAF dataset calculated by Caucasian-based stylised phantoms have been applied to Korean population until now. This study was intended to calculate the SAFs by using realistic Korean voxel phantom and Monte Carlo transport technique for the first time and compare the results with those of the existing Caucasian-based data and the Korean stylised phantom published recently. The up-to-date realistic Korean voxel phantom, KTMAN-2, which was developed from computed tomography (CT) images of an average Korean adult male, was employed for Monte Carlo calculation using EGSnrc user-code, developed for the purpose of this study. The SAFs for 32 target organs and tissues from the photon source, uniformly deposited in a total of 37 source organs and tissues, were calculated from KTMAN-2. The results were compared with those for an adult phantom of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and Korean adult stylised phantom. Two major reasons of discrepancy were analysed: (1) racial difference between the Korean and the Caucasian and (2) anatomical difference between stylised and voxel phantoms. When the source organ was identical to the target organ, difference in SAF caused by the difference in target-organ mass between the Korean and the Caucasian phantoms was mainly observed. When the source and target organs were not identical, significant difference in SAF was observed which was mainly attributed to the difference in inter-organ distance and organ shape between voxel and stylised phantoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17110390     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  6 in total

1.  S values for 131I based on the ICRP adult voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Steven L Simon; Andre Bouville; Brian E Moroz; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Restoration of Full Data from Sparse Data in Low-Dose Chest Digital Tomosynthesis Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Donghoon Lee; Hee-Joung Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Patient-specific dosimetry using pretherapy [¹²⁴I]m-iodobenzylguanidine ([¹²⁴I]mIBG) dynamic PET/CT imaging before [¹³¹I]mIBG targeted radionuclide therapy for neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Shih-ying Huang; Wesley E Bolch; Choonsik Lee; Henry F Van Brocklin; Miguel H Pampaloni; Randall A Hawkins; Aimee Sznewajs; Steven G DuBois; Katherine K Matthay; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  KOREAN PEDIATRIC AND ADULT HEAD COMPUTATIONAL PHANTOMS AND APPLICATION TO PHOTON SPECIFIC ABSORBED FRACTIONS CALCULATIONS.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; Dayton McMillan; Kwang Pyo Kim; Ae-Kyoung Lee; Hyung-do Choi; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Comparison of internal dosimetry factors for three classes of adult computational phantoms with emphasis on I-131 in the thyroid.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Andre Bouville; Steven L Simon; Keith F Eckerman; Dunstana Melo; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Internal photon and electron dosimetry of the newborn patient--a hybrid computational phantom study.

Authors:  Michael Wayson; Choonsik Lee; George Sgouros; S Ted Treves; Eric Frey; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.