| Literature DB >> 25141868 |
Rosine E Tiodjio1, Akihiro Sakatoku1, Akihiro Nakamura1, Daisuke Tanaka1, Wilson Y Fantong2, Kamtchueng B Tchakam1, Gregory Tanyileke2, Takeshi Ohba3, Victor J Hell2, Minoru Kusakabe1, Shogo Nakamura1, Akira Ueda1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the microbial diversity associated with Lake Nyos, a lake with an unusual chemistry in Cameroon. Water samples were collected during the dry season on March 2013. Bacterial and archaeal communities were profiled using Polymerase Chain Reaction-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) approach of the 16S rRNA gene. The results indicate a stratification of both communities along the water column. Altogether, the physico-chemical data and microbial sequences suggest a close correspondence of the potential microbial functions to the physico-chemical pattern of the lake. We also obtained evidence of a rich microbial diversity likely to include several novel microorganisms of environmental importance in the large unexplored microbial reservoir of Lake Nyos.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25141868 PMCID: PMC4139950 DOI: 10.1038/srep06151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Geographical location of Lake Nyos (a) and View of the lake in March 2013 (b). OCB: Ocean Continent Boundary; Map: the map was modified from Aka60; Lake's picture: Photo courtesy of Yutaka Yoshida.
Figure 2Water depth profiles:
carbone dioxide (CO2) (a); bicarbonates (HCO3−) (bicarbonate values have been multiplied by 100) and conductivity (C25) (b); silica (SiO2), manganese (Mn2+) (manganese values have been multiplied by 10), sodium (Na+) and ferrous iron (Fe2+)(c); sulfate (SO42−) (sulfate values have been multiplied by 10) and nitrate (NO3−) (d); temperature (T) (e) and hydrogen potential (pH) (f).
Figure 3Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of bacterial communities at different depths in Lake Nyos (a). Dendrogram calculated with the clustering algorithm of Unweighted Pair-Group Method with an Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) for bacteria in samples from all depths (b). Vertical changes of Shannon-Weaver index of diversity (H’) based on the number and relative intensities of the bands for bacteria identified by DGGE analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene (c). NSed: Sediment sample collected at the bottom of the lake. Arabic numerals: Successfully sequenced bands for bacteria. M: Mass ladder standards.
Figure 4Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of archaeal communities at different depths in Lake Nyos (a). Dendrogram calculated with the clustering algorithm of Unweighted Pair-Group Method with an Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) for archaea in samples from all depths (b). Vertical changes of Shannon-Weaver index of diversity (H’) based on the number and relative intensities of the bands for archaea identified by DGGE analysis of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene (c). NSed: Sediment sample collected at the bottom of the lake. Arabic numerals: Successfully sequenced bands for archaea. M: Mass ladder standards.
Figure 5Principal component analysis (PCA) of Lake Nyos showing the depth-related differences and the structuring role of the physico-chemical parameters.
CO2: Carbon Dioxide; HCO3−: Bicarbonates; Fe2+: Ferrous Iron; C25: Conductivity; Mn2+: Manganese; Na+: Sodium; SiO2: Silica; pH: Hydrogen Potential; NO3−: Nitrate and SO42−: Sulfate.
Figure 6Multidimensional scaling plots produced to compare the sampling depths for bacteria (a) and archaea (b).
NSed: Sediment sample collected at the bottom of the lake.
Bacterial sequences identified at different depths of Lake Nyos and their closest matches to the 16S rRNA gene sequences for bacteria database in the GenBank
| Band | Closest match | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Depth (m) | Phylum | Genotype | Accession no. | Similarity | Organism | Accession no. |
| 1 | 0 | Firmicutes | NyosB1 genotype 1_1 | AB907636 | 100% | NR_043477 | |
| 2 | 0 | Firmicutes | NyosB2 genotype 1_2 | AB907637 | 100% | NR_043477 | |
| 3 | 0 | Firmicutes | NyosB3 genotype 1_3 | AB907638 | 100% | NR_043477 | |
| 4 | 0 | Actinobacteria | NyosB4 genotype 2 | AB907639 | 97% | NR_041365 | |
| 5 | 10 | Firmicutes | NyosB5 genotype 1_4 | AB907640 | 100% | NR_043477 | |
| 6 | 10 | Firmicutes | NyosB6 genotype 1_5 | AB907641 | 99% | NR_043477 | |
| 7 | 25 | Actinobacteria | NyosB7 genotype 3_1 | AB907642 | 93% | NR_024676 | |
| 8 | 25 | Firmicutes | NyosB8 genotype 4_1 | AB907643 | 99% | NR_043479 | |
| 9 | 25 | Firmicutes | NyosB9 genotype 4_2 | AB907644 | 97% | NR_043479 | |
| 10 | 25 | Firmicutes | NyosB10 genotype 5 | AB907645 | 100% | NR_042347 | |
| 11 | 25 | Actinobacteria | NyosB11 genotype 6 | AB907646 | 95% | NR_041365 | |
| 12 | 25 | Actinobacteria | NyosB12 genotype 3_2 | AB907647 | 93% | NR_024676 | |
| 13 | 35 | Gammaproteobacteria | NyosB13 genotype 7 | AB907648 | 100% | NR_026210 | |
| 14 | 35 | Actinobacteria | NyosB14 genotype 8 | AB907649 | 100% | NR_074770 | |
| 15 | 45 | Actinobacteria | NyosB15 genotype 9 | AB907650 | 93% | NR_042469 | |
| 16 | 45 | Actinobacteria | NyosB16 genotype 10_1 | AB907651 | 92% | NR_074390 | |
| 17 | 55 | Actinobacteria | NyosB17 genotype 11 | AB907652 | 94% | NR_042751 | |
| 18 | 60 | Gammaproteobacteria | NyosB18 genotype 12 | AB907653 | 99% | NR_074834 | |
| 19 | 60 | Betaproteobacteria | NyosB19 genotype 13 | AB907654 | 99% | NR_026365 | |
| 20 | 60 | Betaproteobacteria | NyosB20 genotype 14 | AB907655 | 95% | NR_074756 | |
| 21 | 70 | Actinobacteria | NyosB21 genotype 15 | AB907656 | 92% | NR_044522 | |
| 22 | 70 | Alphaproteobacteria | NyosB22 genotype 16 | AB907657 | 100% | NR_025544 | |
| 23 | 80 | Betaproteobacteria | NyosB23 genotype 17 | AB907658 | 98% | NR_044555 | |
| 24 | 100 | Firmicutes | NyosB24 genotype 18 | AB907659 | 86% | NR_037008 | |
| 25 | 100 | Bacteroidetes | NyosB25 genotype 19 | AB907660 | 88% | NR_043121 | |
| 26 | 120 | Firmicutes | NyosB26 genotype 20 | AB907661 | 85% | NR_074965 | |
| 27 | 120 | Ignavibacteriae | NyosB27 genotype 21 | AB907662 | 90% | NR_074796 | |
| 28 | 120 | Bacteroidetes | NyosB28 genotype 22_1 | AB907663 | 93% | NR_044219 | |
| 29 | 120 | Actinobacteria | NyosB29 genotype 10_2 | AB907664 | 93% | NR_074390 | |
| 30 | 140 | Firmicutes | NyosB30 genotype 23 | AB907665 | 92% | NR_102768 | |
| 31 | 140 | Firmicutes | NyosB31 genotype 24 | AB907666 | 84% | NR_044204 | |
| 32 | 160 | Deltaproteobacteria | NyosB32 genotype 25 | AB907667 | 91% | NR_074897 | |
| 33 | 160 | Actinobacteria | NyosB33 genotype 10_3 | AB907668 | 88% | NR_074390 | |
| 34 | 160 | Deltaproteobacteria | NyosB34 genotype 26_1 | AB907669 | 92% | NR_074749 | |
| 35 | 160 | Bacteroidetes | NyosB35 genotype 22_2 | AB907670 | 94% | NR_044219 | |
| 36 | 180 | Caldiserica | NyosB36 genotype 27_1 | AB907671 | 90% | NR_075015 | |
| 37 | 180 | Caldiserica | NyosB37 genotype 27_2 | AB907672 | 93% | NR_075015 | |
| 38 | 180 | Deltaproteobacteria | NyosB38 genotype 26_2 | AB907673 | 91% | NR_074749 | |
| 39 | 180 | Nitrospirae | NyosB39 genotype 28 | AB907674 | 93% | Candidatus | NR_074700 |
| 40 | 180 | Bacteroidetes | NyosB40 genotype 22_3 | AB907675 | 96% | NR_044219 | |
| 41 | 180 | Actinobacteria | NyosB41 genotype 10_4 | AB907676 | 94% | NR_074390 | |
| 42 | 180 | Deltaproteobacteria | NyosB42 genotype 29 | AB907677 | 87% | NR_026154 | |
| 43 | 200 | Actinobacteria | NyosB43 genotype 30 | AB907678 | 91% | NR_028978 | |
| 44 | 210 | Firmicutes | NyosB44 genotype 31 | AB907679 | 88% | NR_027526 | |
| 45 | 210 | Terenicutes | NyosB45 genotype 32 | AB907680 | 90% | NR_025184 | |
| 46 | 210 (Sed) | Fusobacteria | NyosB46 genotype 33 | AB907681 | 99% | NR_042997 | |
aNyosB1 to NyosB46 are the 46 sequenced bacterial bands and bGenotypes 1 to 33 indicate the 33 related genotypes.
Archaeal sequences identified at different depths of Lake Nyos and their closest matches to the 16S rRNA gene sequences for archaea database in the GenBank
| Band | Closest match | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Depth (m) | Phylum | Genotype | Accession no. | Similarity | Organism | Accession no. |
| 1 | 10 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA1 genotype 1_1 | AB907765 | 89% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 2 | 25 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA2 genotype 1_2 | AB907766 | 89% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 3 | 25 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA3 genotype 1_3 | AB907767 | 89% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 4 | 45 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA4 genotype 1_4 | AB907768 | 91% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 5 | 45 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA5 genotype 1_5 | AB907769 | 94% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 6 | 45 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA6 genotype 1_6 | AB907770 | 89% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 7 | 60 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA7 genotype 1_7 | AB907771 | 90% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 8 | 70 | Thaumarchaeota | NyosA8 genotype 1_8 | AB907772 | 90% | Candidatus | NR_102904 |
| 9 | 80 | Euryarchaeota | NyosA9 genotype 2 | AB907773 | 87% | NR_102921 | |
| 10 | 120 | Euryarchaeota | NyosA11 genotype 3_1 | AB917141 | 88% | NR_028161 | |
| 11 | 120 | Euryarchaeota | NyosA12 genotype 3_2 | AB917142 | 92% | NR_028161 | |
| 12 | 180 | Euryarchaeota | NyosA10 genotype 3 | AB907774 | 92% | NR_028161 | |
| 13 | 210 | Crenarchaeota | NyosA13 genotype 4_1 | AB917143 | 80% | NR_102943 | |
| 14 | 210 (Sed) | Crenarchaeota | NyosA14 genotype 4_2 | AB917144 | 80% | NR_102943 | |
| 15 | 210 (Sed) | Euryarchaeota | NyosA15 genotype 5 | AB917145 | 91% | |NR_103951 | |
aNyosA1 to NyosA15 are the 15 sequenced archaeal bands and bGenotypes 1 to 15 indicate the 5 related genotypes.