The melanocortin-3 (MC3R) and melanocortin-4 (MC4R) receptors are expressed in the brain and are implicated in the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis. The endogenous agonist ligands for these receptors (α-, β-, γ-MSH and ACTH) are linear peptides with limited receptor subtype selectivity and metabolic stability, thus minimizing their use as probes to characterize the overlapping pharmacological and physiological functions of the melanocortin receptor subtypes. In the present study, an engineered template, in which the peptide backbone was modified by a heterocyclic reverse turn mimetic at the Trp(7) residue, was synthesized using solid phase peptide synthesis and characterized by a β-galactosidase cAMP based reporter gene assay. The functional assay identified a ∼5 nM mouse MC4R agonist (AST3-88) with more than 50-fold selectivity over the mMC3R. Biophysical studies (2D (1)H NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics) of AST3-88 identified a type VIII β-turn secondary structure spanning the pharmacophore domain stabilized by the intramolecular interactions between the side chains of the His and Trp residues. Enzymatic studies of AST3-88 revealed enhanced stability of AST3-88 over the α-MSH endogenous peptide in rat serum. Upon central administration of AST3-88 into rats, a decreased food intake response was observed. This is the first study to probe the in vivo physiological activity of this engineered peptide-heterocycle template. These findings advance the present knowledge of pharmacophore design for potent, selective, and metabolically stable melanocortin ligands.
The melanocortin-3 (MC3R) and melanocortin-4 (MC4R) receptors are expressed in the brain and are implicated in the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis. The endogenous agonist ligands for these receptors (α-, β-, γ-MSH and ACTH) are linear peptides with limited receptor subtype selectivity and metabolic stability, thus minimizing their use as probes to characterize the overlapping pharmacological and physiological functions of the melanocortin receptor subtypes. In the present study, an engineered template, in which the peptide backbone was modified by a heterocyclic reverse turn mimetic at the Trp(7) residue, was synthesized using solid phase peptide synthesis and characterized by a β-galactosidase cAMP based reporter gene assay. The functional assay identified a ∼5 nM mouseMC4R agonist (AST3-88) with more than 50-fold selectivity over the mMC3R. Biophysical studies (2D (1)H NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics) of AST3-88 identified a type VIII β-turn secondary structure spanning the pharmacophore domain stabilized by the intramolecular interactions between the side chains of the His and Trp residues. Enzymatic studies of AST3-88 revealed enhanced stability of AST3-88 over the α-MSH endogenous peptide in rat serum. Upon central administration of AST3-88 into rats, a decreased food intake response was observed. This is the first study to probe the in vivo physiological activity of this engineered peptide-heterocycle template. These findings advance the present knowledge of pharmacophore design for potent, selective, and metabolically stable melanocortin ligands.
The melanocortin receptor (MCR)
family is a member of the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily
that stimulates the adenylate cyclase signal transduction pathway
and contains five melanocortin receptor subtypes (MC1–5R).[1−6] The melanocortin system includes the endogenous agonists α-,
β-, and γ-melanocortin stimulating hormone (MSH) and adrenocorticotropic
hormone (ACTH) which are derived from posttranslational modifications
of the POMC gene.[7,8] Two endogenous antagonists [agouti
related protein (AGRP)[9] and agouti[10]] have been discovered to antagonize the centrally
expressed MC3R and MC4Rs.[11] All the endogenous
agonists share a common His-Phe-Arg-Trp (6–9; α-MSH numbering)
pharmacophore domain in their primary amino acid sequence.[12−14] This tetrapeptide sequence is postulated to be important for melanocortin
receptor molecular recognition and ligand-induced receptor activation.[15−18] The MC1R, expressed in melanocytes, is involved in the regulation
of skin and hair pigmentation.[1,2,19] The MC2R is stimulated only by the ACTH agonist and is expressed
in the adrenal cortex to regulate steroidogenesis.[1] The MC3R is expressed in the gut, placenta, heart, and
brain. The MC3R has been reported to be involved in metabolism and
energy homeostasis, via mechanism(s) remaining to be characterized.[3,20−22] The MC4R is expressed primarily in the brain and
regulates feeding behavior, energy homeostasis, and sexual function.[5,23−25] The MC5R is expressed in a wide variety of tissues,
both centrally and peripherally, and is involved in exocrine gland
function in mice.[6,26,27] The mouseMC3R and MC4R are expressed in the brain and have 60%
similarity in primary amino acid sequence, but possess distinct ligand
pharmacological profiles. Central activation of the MC3R and MC4R
is postulated to mediate the effects of the melanocortin pathway on
energy homeostasis as both the MC3R knockout (KO)[21,22] and MC4R KO mice show alterations in energy balance.[25] Intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration
of the synthetic melanocortin agonist (MTII) decreased food intake,
while both the endogenous AGRP antagonist and the synthetic SHU9119
antagonist increased food intake.[23,28]Single
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the hMC4R have been identified
in humanpatients with severe obesity. Farooqi et al. investigated
children with severe obesity (under the age of 10) and found that
∼6% of these early onset childhood obesitypatients possessed
hMC4R single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).[29,30] To date, greater than 100 SNPs have been reported in humanpatients.
Seventy of these SNPs have been characterized in vitro (cell culture)
in attempts to identify the putative underlying molecular mechanistic
defects resulting from the amino acid change(s) in the hMC4R.[31−33] In 2011, the MC3R was postulated to be involved in the regulation
of food intake by using a mixed pharmacology ligand that possessed
partial agonist/antagonist activity at the mMC3R and full agonist
activity at the mMC4R.[28] Intracerebroventricular
administration of this compound in the wild type, MC3RKO, and MC4RKO
mice resulted in decreased food intake.[28] These, and other genetic and pharmacological studies (involving
both animals and humans), support the role of the central melanocortins
in the regulation of satiety and energy homeostasis. Selective ligands
are needed to understand underlying molecular mechanism(s) by which
the MC3R and the MC4R regulate energy balance. The discovery and use
of these molecular probes to identify and characterize physiological
functions associated with the MCR system are still being sought after.In continuous efforts to identify potent, selective, and enzymatically
stable melanocortin ligands, we have incorporated a bioactive small
molecule heterocycle into a peptide in attempts to overcome the inherent
problems associated with the endogenous peptides that may limit their
consideration for drug development. The strategy applied modifies
the peptide backbone resulting in changes in intra- and/or intermolecular
interactions postulated to contribute to melanocortin receptor preferred
“bioactive” conformation(s) while providing increased
protease stability. We have previously reported systematic exploration
of the reverse turn mimetic template studied herein with the His6, Phe7, and Arg8 residue domain modifications
(α-MSH numbering) that resulted in the identification of a potent
agonist ligand at the mMC4R (AMW610).[34] However, this compound was only ∼5-fold more selective for
the mMC4R versus the mMC3R.The aromatic indole side chain of
the Trp amino acid, a constituent
of the melanocortin agonist pharmacophore His6-Phe7-Arg8-Trp9 (α-MSH numbering),
has been postulated to play a key role in ligand–receptor interactions.[13,14,35,36] Substitution of the Trp residue by an Ala amino acid in various
peptide templates was reported to reduce agonist potency at the melanocortin
receptor subtypes, particularly at the MC3R.[37−39] Therefore,
we hypothesized that the modifications of this Trp residue side chain,
in the template presented herein, may lead to potent and/or selective
analogues at the melanocortin receptors. It has also been postulated
that a peptide-heterocyclic scaffold could lead to conformationally
constrained ligands that might be more stable for in vitro and in
vivo studies as compared to their linear endogenous counterpart(s).
The aim of this study was to (i) elucidate the role of the Trp amino
acid side chain in the peptide-heterocyclic scaffold in attempts to
obtain potent and selective ligands and (ii) study the scope of this
novel template on serum stability over the endogenous α-MSH
peptide ligand. Peptides, in general, can be promising therapeutic
agents by having a number of advantages over small molecules, in terms
of specificity and affinity for targets. However, general endogenous
peptide low protease stability often traditionally limits their further
consideration in drug development. Standard approaches to make peptides
less susceptible to serum proteases, for example, using modifications
with unnatural amino acids, d-amino acids, β-amino
acids, cyclization of peptide chain at the termini, modifications
of the peptide backbone, and so forth, have been well established.
These approaches often make the peptide structure more constrained
and therefore less prone to protease degradation in serum. In the
present study, we compared the compound containing a heterocyclic-peptide
backbone modification and a disulfide bridge at the N- and C-terminus,
which can restrict a peptide’s backbone conformation and modify
their stability in serum. In addition, in vivo experiments were performed
to assess the physiological effect on food intake of this new chemical
probe. Central administration of AST3-88 decreased a cumulative feeding
response in rats 48 h post-ICV treatments. Herein, we report the design,
functional, and structural characterization of a potent and selective
MC4R full agonist and present the studies of proteolytic stability
and in vivo properties of this template for the first time. Taken
together, this study provides new information on the structural prerequisites
for potent, selective, and increased serum stable melanocortin ligands.
Results
and Discussion
The development of MC3R and MC4R selective
ligands has the therapeutic
potential for the treatment of body weight and feeding related disorders.
A synergistic role of the MC3R in conjunction with the MC4R for feeding
and energy homeostasis are emerging.[28,40] Thus, ligands
and molecular probes that can discriminate in a subtype specific manner
(agonist and/or antagonist), and that can be used to probe the physiological
roles of melanocortin receptor subtypes are still needed in the field.
Toward this goal, a number of small molecules and peptide ligands
have been explored and reported in the literature by a plethora of
academic and industrial research laboratories. Our strategy in this
study is to combine the use of a bioactive small molecule and incorporate
it into a potent cyclic peptide template in attempts to gain further
insight into melanocortin receptor molecular recognition, selectivity,
and increase protease stability. We report herein the AST3-88 melanocortin
agonist that possesses a selective MC4R agonist profile over the MC3R
(>50-fold), enhanced serum stability, and results in decreased
food
intake in vivo.
Synthesis, Structural, and Functional Characterization
The compound AST3-88, and its stereoisomer AMW6103, were synthesized
using previously reported method(s) and is summarized in Scheme 1.[34,41] To probe the importance of the
heterocyclic stereochemistry within the ring moiety, the Cys α-carbons
(marked with * in Figure 1) in both AST3-88
(l-configuration) and AMW6103 (d-configuration)
were designed and synthesized. The Fmoc-Trp(Boc)-aldehyde was synthesized
from the corresponding acid via Fmoc-Trp(Boc)-amide and introduced
via a reductive amination method to the resin bound peptide chain.
The thioether ring was formed on the resin by mild on-bead cyclization
method.[34,41] After completion of the synthesis, the ligand
was cleavage and the crude peptide was dissolved in a 20% DMSO/water
solution and stirred at room temperature to form the disulfide-bridge.
The peptides AST3-88 and AMW6103 possessed the correct molecular weights
as determined by mass spectrometry. The purity of these peptides (>95%)
was assessed by analytical RP-HPLC in two diverse solvent systems
(data provided in the experimental section).
Scheme 1
Figure 1
(A) Illustration of the
compounds (i) heterocycle, (ii) AMW610,
(iii) AST3-88, and (iv) AMW6103. The stereochemistry of the thioether
ring is represented by an asterisk (*). Compounds AST3-88 and AMW610
contain l-Cys, and compound AMW6103 contains a d-Cys at this position. The side chain of His is depicted in green,
DPhe in orange, Arg in blue, the heterocycle moiety in pink, and the
disulfide bridge is circled in yellow. (B) Amino acid sequences of
key endogenous and synthetic melanocortin peptides.
(A) Illustration of the
compounds (i) heterocycle, (ii) AMW610,
(iii) AST3-88, and (iv) AMW6103. The stereochemistry of the thioether
ring is represented by an asterisk (*). Compounds AST3-88 and AMW610
contain l-Cys, and compound AMW6103 contains a d-Cys at this position. The side chain of His is depicted in green,
DPhe in orange, Arg in blue, the heterocycle moiety in pink, and the
disulfide bridge is circled in yellow. (B) Amino acid sequences of
key endogenous and synthetic melanocortin peptides.The compounds were tested for agonist functional
activity at the
mouseMC1R, MC3R, MC4R, and MC5R using a 96-well cAMP based β-galactosidase
reporter gene bioassay (Table 1).[42] The NDP-MSH (Ac-Ser-Tyr-Ser-Nle-Glu-His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Gly-Lys-Pro-Val-NH2) peptide[43] is one of the standard
melanocortin agonists used in the study of melanocortin receptors
and was included herein as a reference control and as an internal
control for maximal ligand efficacy (100%). The pharmacology of the
heterocyclic moiety alone and peptides AMW3-130 and AMW610 (Figure 1) were also included for pharmacological comparisons
of the different but related templates. The AMW3-130 molecule was
designed as a chimeric cyclic peptide template that incorporated the
AGRP based antagonist scaffold that upon substitution of the AGRPArg-Phe-Phe pharmacophore residues with the agonist His-DPhe-Arg-Trp
pharmacophore resulted in the conversion of a weak antagonist into
a potent sub-nanometer agonist that was able to functionally rescue
polymorphic hMC4R SNPs.[33] In 2002, the
heterocyclic moiety[44] (Figure 1) was reported to possess nanomolar MCR functional
agonist activity and initial studies were performed incorporating
this moiety into the AMW3-130 peptide template.[34,41] The first study identified the AMW610 template (Figure 1) as possessing the most potent nanomolar MCR full
agonist functionality of the SAR at the time.[34] Biophysical experiments, similar to the ones reported herein, were
performed in attempts to correlate SAR and identify solution-phase
structural differences between the peptides containing different orientations
of the heterocycle.[8,34] Thus, for structural and functional
comparative purposes, the AMW3-130 and AMW610 ligands have been included
herein.
Table 1
Agonist EC50 (nM) Pharmacology
of the Modified Peptides at the Mouse Melanocortin Receptorsa
mMC1R
mMC3R
mMC4R
mMC5R
selectivity
ratio
peptide
EC50 (nM)
fold change
EC50 (nM)
fold change
EC50 (nM)
fold
change
EC50 (nM)
fold change
MC4R vs MC3R
NDP-MSH
0.018 ± 0.003
0.14 ± 0.03
0.20 ± 0.03
0.30 ± 0.05
1
AMW3-130b
0.35 ± 0.17
2.00 ± 0.45
0.27 ± 0.09
2.32 ± 0.57
7
heterocycle
164 ± 22
7600 ± 1890
650 ± 126
335 ± 106
12
AMW610c
33 ± 9
1
495 ± 215
1
85 ± 13
1
72 ± 16
1
9
AST3-88
68.8 ± 17.9
2
255 ± 24
(2)
4.7 ± 0.49
(18)
11.9 ± 2.3
(6)
54
AMW6103
0.81 ± 0.25
(41)
5300 ± 4300
11
440 ± 220
5
31.0 ± 16.2
(2)
12
The indicated errors represent the
standard error of the mean determined from at least three independent
experiments. Parentheses indicate that an increase in potency has
resulted. Changes less than 3-fold are considered to be within the
inherent experimental assay error.
The AGRP-melanocortin chimeric peptide
AMW3-130 has been previously reported in ref (34) as compound 1.
The AMW610 compound has
been previously
reported in ref (34) as compound 7.
The indicated errors represent the
standard error of the mean determined from at least three independent
experiments. Parentheses indicate that an increase in potency has
resulted. Changes less than 3-fold are considered to be within the
inherent experimental assay error.The AGRP-melanocortin chimeric peptide
AMW3-130 has been previously reported in ref (34) as compound 1.The AMW610 compound has
been previously
reported in ref (34) as compound 7.At the mMC1R and mMC3R, AST3-88 resulted in an equipotent compound,
within the 3-fold inherent experimental error, as compared to AMW610.
At the mMC4R, AST3-88 resulted in a ∼5 nM full agonist that
is 18-fold more potent at this receptor than AMW610. At the mMC5R,
AST3-88 resulted in 6-fold increased agonist potency as compared to
AMW610. The AMW6103 ligand, possessing the D-configuration at the
Cys[6] residue of the heterocyclic ring (Figure 1), resulted in an agonist with sub nM potency at
the mMC1R and equipotent to the cyclic AMW3-130 peptide that lacks
the heterocyclic moiety. The AMW6103 ligand also is ∼40-fold
more potent at the mMC1R and possessed 11- and 5-fold decreased melanocortin
receptor agonist potency at the mMC3R and mMC4Rs, respectively, as
compared to the AMW610 template. Compound AMW6103 is a full agonist
and equipotent to AMW610 at the mMC5R. The AST3-88 ligand, which has l- configuration at the ring, in general, is more active than
its d-counterpart (AMW6103) at the melanocortin receptor
isoforms, with the exception of mMC1R, where AMW6103 is 80-fold more
potent than the AST3-88. These results are consistent with our earlier
study[34] where the l-configured
analogues generally were more potent than their d-counterparts.
Furthermore, the AST3-88 is more than 50-fold selective at the mMC4R
than the mMC3R, versus the AMW6103 that only 12-fold selective and
possessed decreased agonist potency. The MC4R to MC3R selectivity
of the control compounds AMW610, AMW3-130, and heterocyclic ring itself
ranged from 7- to 12-fold (Table 1).[34,41]
Biophysical Structural Studies (NMR and CAMM)
To study
the solution-phase structural differences, and how these subtle conformational
differences might be associated with changes in the observed pharmacology
of these two AST3-88 and AMW6103 analogues, we performed 2D 1H NMR and computer assisted molecular modeling (CAMM) experiments.
Both compounds were dissolved in ∼50% (v/v) acetonitrile-d3 and ∼50% H2O for NMR experiments.
This solvent system has been previously used by our laboratory on
similar peptide template(s) and was used herein so that structures
identified from this study could be compared with previous studies
under similar experimental conditions.[34,41] The criteria
used for this particular solvent selection have been previously reported
and are included herein: “1) it must completely dissolve all
the peptides examined that possessed different biophysical properties,
2) similar solvents have been used previously so that structural comparisons
could be performed and discussed, and 3) the amide protons were well
resolved in this system versus the other solvents attempted. Other
solvents that were attempted but did not result in all the peptides
examined being fully dissolved included (i) DMSO-d6, (ii) CDCl3/DMSO, (iii) CD3CN/H2O, (iv) MeOH-d3, (v) MeOH/DMSO,
(vi) H2O/D2O.”[41] Unfortunately, the AMW6103 compound, in all the different solvent
systems we examined and reported previously (indicated above), was
unable to result in observable and resolvable peaks necessary for
proton assignments, and therefore, this ligand was excluded from further
structural studies. The 1H NMR and chemical shift assignments
(ppm) for analogue AST3-88 (assigned in the ∼50% (v/v) acetonitrile-d3 and ∼50% H2O solvent system)
are provided in the Supporting Information (Table S1). Use of this solvent system and similar experimental
conditions provided the opportunity to directly compare the structures
of AST3-88 with those of AMW610 and AMW3-130.[8,34]In the present study, we compare shifts of specific amino acids and
the global patterns of one peptide to another. Figure 2 is a histogram of the difference between experimental and
reference random-coil (Δ-RC) shift[45] values for the conserved His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Asn-Ala region of compounds
AST3-88 and AMW610 and AMW3-130. The random coil shift values are
averages of overall possible conformations that an amino acid can
adopt in the random coil. Wishart and Sykes have published a complete
set of 1H, 13C, and 15N RC shift
values that can be used as references in order to detect regions in
the peptide or protein which are not in random coil conformations.[45] Given that the compounds have exactly the same
amino acids and that they differ only in the position or presence
of the heterocycle ring, there are significant differences in random
coil shift values between them. The comparison of chemical shifts
from one compound to other demonstrates that the chemical shifts of
these residues can differ significantly, presumably indicating different
conformational structure(s). The random coil shift values of the backbone
NH protons in AST3-88 and AMW3-130, especially in the His, DPhe, Arg,
and Trp region, have negative random coil shift values between 0.2
and 0.3 ppm. This suggests that the AST3-88 may have a regular backbone
conformation with secondary structure in the pharmacophore region
similar to AMW3-130, which has been reported to have a reverse turn
in the similar region.[34] Following resonance
assignments, we determined the nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) values
of the residues, providing an estimate of the distance between pairs
of protons closer than about 5 Å in space. The NOE patterns can
be used as a tool to identify secondary structure in peptides and/or
to distinguish structural differences between analogues. Figure 3 summarizes the NOE intensities observed for the
AST3-88 along with the comparator compounds AMW610 and AMW3-130 (taken
from ref (34)). Several
short- and long-range NOE connectivities were observed for AST3-88
in the pharmacophore domain indicating that the region around the
His-DPhe-Arg-Trp amino acids possesses a regular secondary structure.
To examine the solution based conformational structure(s) of AST3-88
and compare its differences from peptides AMW3-130 and AMW610, restrained
molecular dynamics simulation (RMD) experiments were performed. The
computational molecular dynamics simulations, based upon NMR experimental
values, can be used to provide information on the fluctuations and
conformational changes of the peptides examined. This method allows
the prediction of the static and dynamic properties of molecules from
direct interactions between the molecules. The RMD simulation was
initiated by using unambiguous NMR distant constraints on the peptide
without the presence of the disulfide bond. Following a 1 ns run,
the disulfide bond was formed and the compound was allowed to fully
relax by energy minimization before performing a more robust RMD simulation
for 10 ns. Following the MD run, 200 equally spaced structures were
energy minimized with the NMR based restraints, analyzed, and grouped
into conformational families. A superposition of all 200 energy-minimized
conformations was not distinguishable, suggesting that the simulations
resulted in more than one conformational family. Cluster analysis
was performed by comparing the backbone φ and ψ angles
of the His-DPhe-Arg-Trp amino acid ligand domain, which resulted in
one major family with 40% of all the 200 conformers (Figure 4A). The structures of compounds AMW610 and AMW3-130
were generated by the same method depicted above and included here
for comparison. The structure of AST3-88 is represented as the superposition
of the conformers of the major family of compound aligned on backbone
heavy atoms. The global root-mean-square (RMSD) value of residues
in the “His-DPhe-Arg-Trp” region from the average structure
is 1.16 ± 0.45 Å. Analysis of the φ–ψ
backbone dihedral angles of the average structure (Supporting Information Table S2) resulted in the identification
of type VIII β-turn structure spanning DPhe4 and
Arg5 residues. Type VIII is reported to be the most common
type of β-turn secondary structure observed in peptides and
proteins.[46] The φ and ψ values
of the representative structure from the major family are φ(i + 1) ≈ −69, ψ(i +
1) ≈ −58, φ(i + 2) ≈ −125,
and ψ(i + 2) ≈ 41 [idealized values
for this type of turn have been reported as φ(i + 1) ≈ −60, ψ(i + 1) ≈
−30, φ(i + 2) ≈ −120,
and ψ(i + 2) ≈ 120].[46] A putative hydrogen bond was also identified between the
backbone carbonyl oxygen of His[3] (i residue)
and the backbone amide NH of Cys6 (i +
3 residue). Figure 5 represents the φ–ψ
distribution of all the residues in the sequence of AST3-88 with the
exception of the terminal Tyr residues. The φ–ψ
distribution map of AST3-88 resulted in conformers tightly packed
in the pharmacophore regions, suggesting a constrained conformation
in this region, similar to the case of AMW3-130. Apart from the pharmacophore
region, the Phe10 and Cys11 amino acids have
very compact conformers, suggesting that the C-terminus of this compound
is relatively rigid and involved in regular structure. This observation
is consistent with the constraints induced by the disulfide bridge.
Figure 2
Illustration
of the compound deviation from random coil values
for (A) AST3-88, (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130.[45] The HN and Hα protons are represented
by solid bars and open bars, respectively. Vertical axes are in parts
per million, and the horizontal axes represent the His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Asn-Ala
region of the peptide.
Figure 3
Summary of the NOE intensities from 400 ms NOESY data observed
for the compound (A) AST3-88, (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130. The height
of the bar indicates the strength of the NOE, and these are categorized
as strong (1.8–3.0 Å), medium (1.8–3.5 Å),
or weak (1.8–5.0 Å).
Figure 4
Sausage stereoview representations of the major family members
of compound (A) AST3-88 (in the H, F, R,W region; RMSD = 1.16 ±
0.45 Å), (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130 (in the H, F, R,W region;
RMSD = 0.66 ± 0.3 Å) aligned on the backbone heavy atoms
of residues 3–7. The His side chain is indicated in green,
the DPhe side chain in yellow, the Arg side chain in blue, and the
Trp side chain in orange. A wide gray backbone indicates greater flexibility
in that domain. Following restrained molecular dynamics (RMD) simulations
for 10 ns, 200 equally spaced structures were energy minimized with
the NMR based restraints. The energy minimized structures were grouped
into conformational families by comparison of the backbone dihedral
angels within the His-Phe-Arg-Trp domain.
Figure 5
CAMM based φ–ψ angle distribution for ligands
(A) AST3-88, (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130 conformational families.
The His residue is indicated in green, the DPhe residue in orange,
the Arg residue in blue, and the Trp residue in red. All other residues
are indicated in purple.
Illustration
of the compound deviation from random coil values
for (A) AST3-88, (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130.[45] The HN and Hα protons are represented
by solid bars and open bars, respectively. Vertical axes are in parts
per million, and the horizontal axes represent the His-DPhe-Arg-Trp-Asn-Ala
region of the peptide.Summary of the NOE intensities from 400 ms NOESY data observed
for the compound (A) AST3-88, (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130. The height
of the bar indicates the strength of the NOE, and these are categorized
as strong (1.8–3.0 Å), medium (1.8–3.5 Å),
or weak (1.8–5.0 Å).Sausage stereoview representations of the major family members
of compound (A) AST3-88 (in the H, F, R,W region; RMSD = 1.16 ±
0.45 Å), (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130 (in the H, F, R,W region;
RMSD = 0.66 ± 0.3 Å) aligned on the backbone heavy atoms
of residues 3–7. The His side chain is indicated in green,
the DPhe side chain in yellow, the Arg side chain in blue, and the
Trp side chain in orange. A wide gray backbone indicates greater flexibility
in that domain. Following restrained molecular dynamics (RMD) simulations
for 10 ns, 200 equally spaced structures were energy minimized with
the NMR based restraints. The energy minimized structures were grouped
into conformational families by comparison of the backbone dihedral
angels within the His-Phe-Arg-Trp domain.CAMM based φ–ψ angle distribution for ligands
(A) AST3-88, (B) AMW610, and (C) AMW3-130 conformational families.
The His residue is indicated in green, the DPhe residue in orange,
the Arg residue in blue, and the Trp residue in red. All other residues
are indicated in purple.The 2D 1H NMR and CAMM studies were performed
to correlate
the functional and conformational properties the compounds. In earlier
studies, it was postulated that the bioactive conformation of melanocortin
ligands such as, MTII and SHU9119 constitute a putative reverse turn
in the pharmacophore region.[47] In a study
of chimeric AGRP-melanocortin template peptides with a lactam bridge,
similar to the AMW3-130 template, a reverse turn was found in all
the studied peptides.[48] The chimeric peptide
template used in present study (with a disulfide bridge in place of
a lactam bridge) was also found to have Type I′ reverse turn
encompassing Arg and Trp residues in pharmacophore domain.[34,41] In present study, we found that compound AST3-88, an agonist on
all the melanocortin receptor subtypes, possesses a Type VIII reverse
turn around DPhe4 (i + 1) and Arg5 (i + 2) regions of the sequence. The reverse
turn was stabilized by the hydrogen bond between His3 and
Cys6 residues. In the earlier structural findings for the
compound AMW610 where the Arg residue resided on the heterocyclic
moiety, it was observed that insertion of the heterocyclic ring made
the peptide backbone more flexible and resulted in several conformational
families with very low populations.[34,41] In contrast,
positioning of the Trp residue on the heterocyclic ring (AST3-88)
in the present study resulted in one major family with 40% of the
total studied conformers. The very close proximity of His3 and Trp6 suggests that the structure may be additionally
stabilized by aromatic–aromatic and/or cation−π
interactions involving side chains of these residues. The His3 and Trp6 residues appeared to be stacked in parallel
arrangement. The DPhe4 residue is oriented perpendicular
to His3 and Trp6 amino acids. Additionally,
the arrangement of aromatic residue side chains of His3, Trp7, and Phe10 are juxtaposed, forming a
hydrophobic cluster. The above-mentioned structural features of AST3-88
are in agreement with the reported structure of MTII and linear α-MSH-analogues
in terms of having a reverse turn in the pharmacophore region. The
AMW3-130 ligand, a potent agonist at the melanocortin receptors, was
also identified to possess a type I′ β-turn encompassing
Trp7 and Asn8 residues with a constrained backbone
conformation. These data support the hypothesis that the modulation
in the orientation of Trp residue stabilizes the bioactive conformation
via intramolecular interaction and orient the other side chains for
efficient receptor interactions. This also suggests that the reverse
turn in the pharmacophore region is more favored for the MC4R binding
pocket than the MC3R. It has been postulated that the putative hydrophobic
pocket of MC3R is different than the MC4R, which explains the difference
in ligand–receptor interactions and hence, the difference in
EC50 values at these receptor subtypes.
Serum Stability
of Compound AST3-88
Modifications in
peptide structure by different approaches including cyclization,[49,50]d-amino acids,[51] unnatural amino
acids,[52] and β-amino acids[53] are well recognized strategies for the goal
of improving peptide stability in serum and protecting against protease-mediated
degradation. Since AST3-88 was prepared by inserting a heterocyclic
moiety into the peptide backbone, the stability of AST3-88 in rat
serum was compared with two peptides prone for degradation, α-MSH
and AST789-13 (Ac-RRWWRF-NH2). It has been reported for
α-MSH [13-mer linear peptide with acetylated N-terminus and
amidated C-terminus (Ac-SYSMEHFRWGKPV-NH2)]
that, during a 4 h incubation, it was rapidly degraded in frog serum
and lost half of its activity in rat serum after 1 h of incubation.[12,54] The AST789-13 control peptide was reported to possesses a half-life
of 1.5 h in human serum.[55] In our study,
LC-MS analysis of the aliquots collected during 24 h incubations of
these three peptides with rat serum revealed differences in their
degradation kinetics (Figure 6). The results
indicated that AST789-13 was degraded completely within 2 h. The endogenous
α-MSH peptide had a half-life of nearly 2.5 h with only ∼10%
of the compound remaining in the serum after 6 h. of incubation. In
contrast, AST3-88 was far more stable than AST789-13 and α-MSH
as ∼40% of AST3-88 remained at 6 h and 12% at 24 h of incubation
in rat serum (Figure 6). As the degradation
products of AST3-88 were not identified in this study, the degradation
pathway of AST3-88 and the mechanism behind the greater stability
of AST3-88 over α-MSH and AST789-13 remain undefined. However,
it is postulated that the structural properties of AST3-88, including
the disulfide bridge joining the N- and C-terminus, inclusion of a d-amino acid in its sequence, and the presence of the heterocyclic
modified peptide backbone (Figure 1), contribute
to its resistance to both exopeptidase and endopeptidase-mediated
degradation.
Figure 6
Rat serum stability profiles of the peptides AST789-13,
α-MSH,
and AST3-88. Relative peptide concentrations are based on mass spec
ion counts. AST789-13 completely degraded in less than 2 h. Endogenous
linear peptide α-MSH rapidly degraded within 6 h with only ∼1%
intact peptide remaining at the 24 h point. Compound AST3-88, with
the engineered backbone, degraded slowly in rat serum with ∼40%
remaining at 6 h, and ∼12% was detected by MS at the 24 h time
point.
Rat serum stability profiles of the peptides AST789-13,
α-MSH,
and AST3-88. Relative peptide concentrations are based on mass spec
ion counts. AST789-13 completely degraded in less than 2 h. Endogenous
linear peptide α-MSH rapidly degraded within 6 h with only ∼1%
intact peptide remaining at the 24 h point. Compound AST3-88, with
the engineered backbone, degraded slowly in rat serum with ∼40%
remaining at 6 h, and ∼12% was detected by MS at the 24 h time
point.
Effect of ICV Treatment
of Compound AST3-88 on Feeding
To determine if compound AST3-88
produces an in vivo physiological
response, we administered two doses (2.5 or 5.0 nmol) of compound
AST3-88 intracerbroventricularly (ICV) into the third ventricle of
cannulated and overnight fasted rats. In earlier studies, administration
of MC3R and MC4R agonists inhibited food intake postinjection.[23,28] Conversely, ICV administration of MC3R and MC4R antagonists increases
food intake.[23,28] To test the effects of the MC4R
selective compound AST3-88, rats were induced to feed by overnight
food deprivation, a validated method to observe modulation in MC4R
signaling.[23] Animals were injected with
either vehicle or compound AST3-88 after completion of overnight fasting
with food being returned 90 min after treatment. Figure 7 shows the effect of AST3-88 on food intake up to 48 h after
the return of food. The AST3-88 ligand produced a statistically significant
decrease in food intake (relative to the vehicle condition) at both
doses 3 to 48 h post treatment. Thiele and colleagues have previously
reported this type of prolonged activity upon ICV administration of
MTII in rats.[56] They reported that MTII
reduced 48 h food consumption (1.0 nmol dose), and also reduced body
weight at 24 and 48 h (0.1 and 1.0 nmol doses, respectively) post
treatment. In another example, central administration of agouti-related
protein (AGRP), an endogenous antagonist of the MC3R and MC4R, robustly
increased food intake in mice with the effect lasting up to 24 h.[57,58] It has also been reported that AGRP produced a robust and prolonged
food intake response in wild type, MC3RKO, and MC4RKO mice.[28] In summary, ICV treatment of compound AST3-88
has a significant effect on inhibition of food intake in rats.
Figure 7
(A) Effects
of AST3-88 ICV treatment on cumulative food intake
in rats. Animals were injected with either saline, 2.5 nmol, or 5
nmol of AST3-88 after completion of overnight fasting. Each data point
is represents the mean of 4–6 animals ± SEM; *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001.
(A) Effects
of AST3-88 ICV treatment on cumulative food intake
in rats. Animals were injected with either saline, 2.5 nmol, or 5
nmol of AST3-88 after completion of overnight fasting. Each data point
is represents the mean of 4–6 animals ± SEM; *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001.
Conclusions
In
the current study, it has been demonstrated that an engineered
peptide backbone strategy could be utilized to obtain potent, selective,
and stable melanocortin receptor ligands. Taken together with previous
observations, the results of these studies support the hypothesis
that the Trp residue side chain may play an important role in (i)
stabilizing the bioactive conformation by intramolecular interactions,
(ii) properly orienting the pharmacophore residues to interact with
the receptor in the binding pocket, and (iii) specific intermolecular
interaction with the receptor residues resulting in differential agonist
potencies at different receptors, that can contribute to selectivity.
The advantage of this approach also extends to the enhanced metabolic
and physiological stability of the engineered peptides. The AST3-88
molecule that possesses nanomolar potency and selectivity for the
MC4R versus the MC3R, prolonged biological activity, and resistance
to enzymatic proteolysis can serve as a molecular probe to study physiological
role(s) of these melanocortin receptors and also further improve the
design of selective ligands.
Methods
Chemistry
All chemicals were ACS grade or better, were
obtained from commercial suppliers, and were used without further
purification. The amino acids Nα 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl
(Fmoc)-Cys(Trt), Fmoc-Arg(Pbf), Fmoc-His(Trt), Fmoc-Trp(Boc), Fmoc-d-Phe, Fmoc-Phe, Fmoc-Asn(Trt), Fmoc-Ala, Rink amide p-methylbenzhydrylamine Resin (p-MBHA Resin, 0.47 mequiv/g
substitution), and the coupling reagent O-benzotriazole-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HBTU)
were purchased from Peptides International (Louisville, KY). The amino
acid Fmoc-Tyr (tBu) was purchased from Advanced Chem Tech (Louisville,
KY).
Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis Using Microwave Irradiation
The Rink amideMBHA resin was transferred into a 25 mL polypropylene
reaction vessel (CEM) and “swelled” in dichloromethane
for 1 h. The bottom cap of the vessel was removed after the 1 h swelling
process, and the vessel was transferred onto a vacuum filtration manifold.
Deprotection of the Fmoc group was achieved in DMF by irradiating
the sample at 75 °C, 30 W for 4 min in the CEM Discover SPS instrument.
After cooling and washing the resin with DMF, a ninhydrin “Kaiser”
test was performed.[59] The amino acid coupling
step was performed under the same microwave conditions (75 °C,
30 W) for 5 min using HBTU. The coupling of the Cys and His amino
acids was performed at lower temperatures (50 °C, 30 W) for 5
min. The heterocycle ring was assembled as previously described.[44] The reductive alkylation, acylation of chloroacetic
anhydride, and the deprotection of the thio tert-Butyl
group steps were performed at the room temperature. The thioether
ring closure was performed using N-ethylmorpholine
in DMF at elevated temperature (55–60 °C) in an automated
synthesizer (Advanced ChemTech 440MOS, Louisville, KY). Bubbling nitrogen
gas into the reaction vessel mixed the reagents. The iterative process
of the Fmoc deprotection/coupling cycle was performed to elongate
the peptide chain. After the final deprotection, the peptide was cleaved
from the resin using the cleavage cocktail (91% TFA, 3.0% H2O, 3.0% EDT, and 3.0% TIS) at room temperature for 3 h. Note, as
the peptides containing the heterocyclic moiety were synthesized to
completion on resin, if racemization occurred during the isolated
heterocycle formation as previously reported,[44] it was not identified or purified in the major product peak collected
by RP-HPLC. After cleavage and side chain deprotection, the solution
was concentrated and the peptide was precipitated and washed using
cold (4 °C) anhydrous diethyl ether.The crude linear peptides
were dissolved in 20% DMSO in water (1.0 mg/mL) and stirred at room
temperature. Progress for the disulfide cyclization was monitored
by UV-HPLC, which was generally completed within 24–36 h. The
resulting solution was lyophilized to yield the crude cyclic peptide
and purified by reversed-phase HPLC (flow rate of 5 mL/min and gradients
ranging from 30%–55% acetonitrile/water 0.1% TFA) using a Shimadzu
chromatography system with a photodiode array detector and a semipreparative
RP-HPLC C18 bonded silica column (Vydac 218TP1010, 1.0 × 25 cm).
The purified peptides were >95% pure as determined by RP-HPLC in
two
diverse solvent systems and had the correct molecular mass. Electrospray
ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was used to record spectra on
an ABI 3200Q TRAP instrument. Analytical data for AST3-88: purity
> 95%; k′ (MeCN) 4.7, k′ (MeOH) 7.9; exact mass calcd
for C77H94N20O15S3, 1634.6; found, 1635.6 (M + 1). Analytical data for AMW6103:
purity > 95%; k′ (MeCN) 5.7, k′ (MeOH) 9.8; exact
mass
calcd for C77H94N20O15S3, 1634.6; found, 1635.7 (M + 1).
Functional Bioassay
The HEK-293 cells stably expressing
the mouse melanocortin receptors were maintained in Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal calf serum and
transfected with 4 μg of the CRE/β-galactosidase reporter
gene as previously described.[42] Briefly,
5000–15 000 post-transfection cells were plated into
collagen treated 96-well plates (Nunc) and incubated overnight. Forty-eight
hours post-transfection, the cells were stimulated with 100 μL
of peptide (10–4–10–12 M)
or forskolin (10–4 M) control in assay medium (DMEM
containing 0.1 mg/mL BSA and 0.1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine) for 6
h. The assay media was aspirated, and 50 μL of lysis buffer
(250 mM Tris-HCl pH = 8.0 and 0.1% Triton X-100) was added. The plates
were stored at −80 °C overnight. The plates containing
the cell lysates were thawed the following day. Aliquots of 10 μL
were taken from each well and transferred to another 96-well plate
for relative protein determination. To the cell lysate plates, 40
μL of phosphate-buffered saline with 0.5% BSA was added to each
well. Subsequently, 150 μL of substrate buffer (60 mM sodium
phosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol,
2 mg/mL ortho-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside [ONPG])
was added to each well and the plates were incubated at 37 °C.
The sample absorbance, OD405, was measured using a 96-well
plate reader (Molecular Devices). The relative protein was determined
by adding 200 μL of 1:5 dilutions Bio Rad G250 protein dye/water
to the 10 μL cell lysate sample taken previously, and the OD595 was measured on a 96-well plate reader (Molecular Devices).
Data points were normalized both to the relative protein content and
nonreceptor dependent forskolin stimulation. Maximal efficacy was
compared to that observed for the NDP-MSH control peptide tested simultaneously
on each 96-well plate. The agonist EC50 values represent
the mean of duplicate wells performed in three or more independent
experiments. The EC50 value estimates, and their associated
standard errors, were determined by fitting the data to a nonlinear
least-squares analysis using the PRISM software program (v4.0, GraphPad
Inc.). The results are not corrected for peptide content.
NMR Spectroscopy
and Computer-Assisted Molecular Modeling (CAMM)
The ligand
NMR samples were prepared (∼1 mM) by dissolving
1.0 mg of the purified peptide in a 750 μL solution containing
400 μL of CD3CN and 350 μL of H2O and adding DSS as an internal standard (0.0 ppm). The NMR data
were collected at 34 °C with a Bruker Avance II spectrometer
operating at 600 MHz (using a cryoprobe) at the Advanced Magnetic
Resonance and Imaging Spectroscopy (AMRIS) facility at the University
of Florida. Standard proton TOCSY and NOESY 2D 1H NMR data
were collected, processed, and analyzed as described previously.[34,41,48,60] The chemical shifts of each of the peptides in this study were assigned
using standard TOCSY and NOESY 1H-based strategies.[61]Proton–proton distances were calibrated
using the well resolved methylene protons of the Cys6 (heterocycle
ring) residue based on the relationship r = rref(ηref/η)1/6, where r is the distance between atoms, η
is the NOESY cross-peak volume, rref is
the known distance, and ηref is the corresponding
volume of the NOESY calibration cross-peak. The NOE volumes were categorized
as strong (1.8–3.0 Å), medium (1.8–3.5 Å),
or weak (1.8–5.0 Å) (Supporting Information). All conformational molecular
modeling experiments were performed using the SYBYL v7.0 software
from Tripos Inc. (St. Louis, MO) on a Silicon Graphics workstation.
Restrained molecular dynamics (RMD) simulations were run in vacuo
with a dielectric constant of 4.0, at a temperature of 500 K, and
using the Tripos force field and Gastaiger-Hückel partial atomic
charges. The peptides were initially built in a fully extended linear
conformation. In the first step of modeling, RMD simulations were
run for 1 ns. Following the initial 1 ns RMD trajectory, the cysteine
residues were oriented next to each other, and disulfide bonds were
manually formed and energy minimized without restraints. Finally,
all the NMR-based NOE restraints were included, and 10 ns RMD trajectories
were collected. Following the RMD simulations, structures from 200
equally spaced points along the dynamics trajectory were energy minimized,
analyzed, and grouped into conformational families. Comparing the
backbone φ and ψ angles of the His-DPhe-Arg-Trp amino
acid ligand domain performed cluster analysis. This process identified
representative structures (lowest energy conformers) of the conformational
families that were used for further analysis.
Serum Stability Assay
Rat serum (495 μL) was
incubated at 37 °C for 15 min, and 5 μL of peptide (10–3 M stock solution; final conc. 10 μM) was added
to initiate the assay. The solution (serum + peptide) was mixed intermittently
duration the incubation, and 50 μL aliquots were taken at 0,
0.5, 1.5, 3, 6, and 24 h of the incubation. Aliquots were then mixed
with 150 μL of cold (4 °C) 66% aqueous acetonitrile and
incubated at 4 °C for 10–15 min to precipitate serum proteins.
The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 14 000g for 10 min and then stored at −80 °C immediately.
Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) Analysis
of Peptide Stability
A 5 μL aliquot of diluted samples
was injected into a Waters Acquity ultraperformance liquid chromatography
(UPLC) system (Milford, MA) and separated by a gradient of mobile
phase ranging from water to 95% aqueous acetonitrile containing 0.1%
formic acid over a 10 min run. LC elute was introduced into a Waters
SYNAPT QTOF mass spectrometer (QTOF-MS) for accurate mass measurement
and ion counting under extended dynamic range mode. Capillary voltage
and cone voltage were maintained at 3.2 kV and 30 V, respectively,
for positive electrospray ionization (ESI). Source temperature and
desolvation temperature were set at 120 and 350 °C, respectively.
Nitrogen was used as both cone gas (50 L/h) and desolvation gas (700
L/h). Mass chromatograms and mass spectral data were acquired and
processed by MassLynx software (Waters) in centroid format. Peptides
were identified by accurate masses and comparison with authentic standards.
Signal intensity of interested peptide in spiked serum sample at the
beginning of incubation (0 h) was arbitrarily set as 100%.
Feeding
Studies in Rats
Animals
Male Sprague–Dawley
rats (Charles River)
were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine/xylazine (90/10 mg/kg).
In a stereotaxic apparatus with the incisor bar set at −3.3
mm (relative to horizontal zero), cannulas (26 gauge) were implanted
with the tip targeted at 2.5 mm posterior and 8.1 mm ventral to bregma.
Cannulas were secured to the skull with stainless steel screws and
dental cement. All injections were made with a 33 gauge internal cannula
that extended 1 mm beyond the tip of the guide cannula. In all cases,
the injection volume was 3 μL. The injections were given over
a 30 s period, and the internal cannula was left in place an additional
30 s to allow diffusion from the tip. Cannula patency and placement
was tested prior to and following data collection. This test consisted
of an ICV injection of angiotensin II (30 ng/3 μL). Data from
rats that did not drink at least 5 mL of water in the 30 min period
after injection in both trials were discarded. The feeding study was
approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care
and Use Committee.
Feeding Regimen
For the data and
results presented
here, rats were fasted overnight and then given ICV injections of
compound 1 (AST3-88) at doses of 0, 2.5, and 5 nmol.
The peptide was initially dissolved in a small volume of DMSO, and
saline was added to adjust the concentrations. The final concentration
of DMSO in the vehicle and both doses was 16.7%. Food was returned
90 min after injections, and food intake (corrected for spillage)
was measured (by weight) at 1.5, 3, 24, and 48 h. Rats were weighed
prior to injection and 1, 2, and 4 days later. No adverse or toxicity
related behaviors were observed in the duration of this study. It
should be noted that, prior to this test, these rats had been used
in two trials (conducted 7 and 15 days earlier) in which they received
ICV injections of AST3-88 (0, 2.5, or 5 nmol) under ad libitum feeding
conditions and no statistically significant differences were observed.
Statistics
Data are represented as the average of the
mean ± SEM. For statistical analyses, cumulative food intake
over time was performed using two-way ANOVA followed by an LSD post
hoc test. Statistical significance is considered if p < 0.05.
Authors: I Sadaf Farooqi; Julia M Keogh; Giles S H Yeo; Emma J Lank; Tim Cheetham; Stephen O'Rahilly Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T K Sawyer; P J Sanfilippo; V J Hruby; M H Engel; C B Heward; J B Burnett; M E Hadley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1980-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shi Liu; Ross W Cheloha; Tomoyuki Watanabe; Thomas J Gardella; Samuel H Gellman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Cody J Lensing; Danielle N Adank; Stacey L Wilber; Katie T Freeman; Sathya M Schnell; Robert C Speth; Adam T Zarth; Carrie Haskell-Luevano Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Cody J Lensing; Katie T Freeman; Sathya M Schnell; Danielle N Adank; Robert C Speth; Carrie Haskell-Luevano Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 7.446