Chunbai He1, Kuangda Lu, Wenbin Lin. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Chicago , 929 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
Abstract
Real-time measurement of intracellular pH in live cells is of great importance for understanding physiological/pathological processes and developing intracellular drug delivery systems. We report here the first use of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (NMOFs) for intracellular pH sensing in live cells. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was covalently conjugated to a UiO NMOF to afford F-UiO NMOFs with exceptionally high FITC loadings, efficient fluorescence, and excellent ratiometric pH-sensing properties. Upon rapid and efficient endocytosis, F-UiO remained structurally intact inside endosomes. Live cell imaging studies revealed endo- and exocytosis of F-UiO and endosome acidification in real time. Fluorescently labeled NMOFs thus represent a new class of nanosensors for intracellular pH sensing and provide an excellent tool for studying NMOF-cell interactions.
Real-time measurement of intracellular pH in live cells is of great importance for understanding physiological/pathological processes and developing intracellular drug delivery systems. We report here the first use of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (NMOFs) for intracellular pH sensing in live cells. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was covalently conjugated to a UiO NMOF to afford F-UiO NMOFs with exceptionally high FITC loadings, efficient fluorescence, and excellent ratiometric pH-sensing properties. Upon rapid and efficient endocytosis, F-UiO remained structurally intact inside endosomes. Live cell imaging studies revealed endo- and exocytosis of F-UiO and endosome acidification in real time. Fluorescently labeled NMOFs thus represent a new class of nanosensors for intracellular pH sensing and provide an excellent tool for studying NMOF-cell interactions.
Intracellular pH (pHi) plays
an essential role in regulating cellular behaviors, including
vesicle trafficking, cellular metabolism and signaling, and cell proliferation
and apoptosis.[1] In eukaryotic cells, the
functions of subcellular organelles are highly dependent on the pH
values in these individual compartments.[3] The organelles participating in the secretory and endocytic pathways,
such as endosomes and lysosomes, have a relatively low pH ranging
from 4.5 to 6.5.[1] Real-time sensing and
monitoring of pH changes inside live cells are thus of great importance
for understanding physiological and pathological processes and the
rational design of intracellular drug delivery systems. pHi can be measured with a variety of techniques, including proton-permeable
microelectrodes, NMR, absorption spectroscopy, and fluorescence imaging.[4] Fluorescence-based techniques are among the most
powerful tools for pH sensing, owing to their high sensitivity and
outstanding spatiotemporal resolution.[7] In particular, ratiometric sensing by measuring fluorescent signals
at two excitation or emission wavelengths of a pH-sensitive probe
is not adversely influenced by fluctuation of local probe concentration,
allowing accurate and reliable pHi measurements.[8] Since Kopelman et al. designed PEBBLEs (probes encapsulated
by biologically localized embedding) as the first generation of ratiometric
fluorescence nanosensors,[9] a number of
polymeric nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles, quantum dots, latex
nanobeads, and zeolite-based nanoparticles have been developed for
pHi sensing.[6,10]Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new class of hybrid
materials self-assembled from organic bridging ligands and metal-ion
connecting points, and have been exploited as chemical sensors for
metal ions, gas molecules, enantiopurity, and pH in aqueous solution.[16] Recently, nanoscale MOFs (NMOFs) have also been
developed for the delivery of chemotherapeutics and biologics.[27] Herein we report the design of the first NMOF-based
pH sensor for real-time pHi measurements in live cells.Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) is pH sensitive and exhibits
pH-dependent ratiometric fluorescence changes, conferring its ability
to sense the pHi in live cells.[34] However, the utility of FITC in live cell imaging is severely limited
by its rapid release from cells.[35] We hypothesize
that covalent conjugation of FITC to the bridging ligands of an NMOF
will generate a novel NMOF sensor for real-time pHi measurements
in live cells (Figure 1a). The advantages of
using such FITC-conjugated NMOFs for pHi sensing include
the following: (1) The periodic and porous structures of NMOFs enable
high FITC loadings without dye aggregation, thus preventing deleterious
self-quenching. (2) The open channels of NMOFs allow rapid and free
diffusion of hydronium ions to afford fast sensor response.[36] (3) The covalent conjugation of FITC to NMOFs
prevents dye leaching, thus eliminating background interference stemming
from the released dye during pHi sensing.
Figure 1
Preparation,
characterization, and stability of F-UiO. (a) Schematic
presentation of F-UiO synthesis. (b) PXRD patterns of UiO, F-UiO,
and F-UiO after incubating in HBSS for 12 h. TEM images showing the
morphology of F-UiO (c), and F-UiO after incubating in HBSS for 12
h (d). Bar: 200 nm.
The UiO
NMOF with the amino-triphenyldicarboxylic acid
(amino-TPDC) bridging ligand was synthesized by heating a dimethylformamide
(DMF) solution of ZrCl4 and amino-TPDC at 80 °C for
5 days.[28] Transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) micrographs showed the hexagonal plate-like morphology of the
UiO NMOF and gave a diameter of ∼100 nm and a thickness of
∼30 nm (Figure S1, Supporting Information
[SI]). FITC was covalently conjugated to the UiO NMOF to afford
F-UiO by forming a thiourea linkage between the isothiocyanate group
on FITC and the amino group of the bridging ligand (Figure 1a). 1H NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry
supported the covalent attachment of FITC to amino-TPDC (Figures S3 and S4). F-UiO retained the hexagonal
plate-like morphology and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern
of the UiO NMOF as shown in Figures 1b,c and S5. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements
gave average diameters of 111.8 nm (PDI = 0.140) and 123.2 nm (PDI
= 0.135) for UiO and F-UiO, respectively (Figures
S2 and S6).Negligible dye leaching, good structural
stability, and high quantum
efficiency are key attributes of ideal fluorescence nanosensors. The
covalent conjugation of FITC to UiO efficiently prevents the dye leaching.
Less than 4.5% of FTIC fluorescence was observed in the supernatant
after incubating F-UiO in Hanks’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS)
for 24 h (Figures S7 and S8).[38] After incubating in HBSS for 12 h, F-UiO exhibited
unaltered morphology and PXRD patterns (Figures 1b,d, S9, and S10), indicating its structural
stability in the media used for pHi sensing.Preparation,
characterization, and stability of F-UiO. (a) Schematic
presentation of F-UiO synthesis. (b) PXRD patterns of UiO, F-UiO,
and F-UiO after incubating in HBSS for 12 h. TEM images showing the
morphology of F-UiO (c), and F-UiO after incubating in HBSS for 12
h (d). Bar: 200 nm.Low fluorescence efficiency
is another common issue for dye-loaded
nanosensors, which can be attributed to the insufficient dye loading
or self-quenching due to dye aggregation. Typical fluorescence dye
loadings in amorphous nanosensors range from 0.1% to 0.5% to avoid
self-quenching resulting from dye aggregation.[11,39] In contrast, the porous and regular structures of UiO allow exceptionally
high dye loadings without dye aggregation (see below).We evaluated
the fluorescence efficiency of F-UiO with a series
of FITC loadings to obtain optimal F-UiO for pHi sensing.
The FITC loading increased with the FITC feed amount (1, 3, 5, 8,
12, 17, and 30 wt%) and exhibited saturation behaviors when the FITC
feed reached 12 wt% (Figures S11–S13). The fluorescence efficiency of F-UiO at different FITC loadings
was evaluated by comparing the absorbance of F-UiO at 490 nm (Figures S14 and S15) and the fluorescence intensity
of F-UiO at 516 nm (with excitation at 490 nm), respectively. As shown
in Figures 2a and S16, the absorbance of F-UiO increased linearly as the FITC loading
increased (after subtracting the light scattering of the blank UiO).
In contrast, the fluorescence linearly increased as the FITC loading
increased up to an FITC loading of ∼7 wt% (corresponding to
8 wt% of feed amount), and then saturated as the FITC loading further
increased, suggesting appreciable self-quenching of FITC dyes at >7
wt% loading. For subsequent pHi sensing and imaging studies,
we use F-UiO with an FITC loading of 4 wt% to avoid self-quenching
of FITC dyes and potential complications from different pH dependence
behaviors of dye aggregates.
Figure 2
(a) Correlation between FITC absorbance and
fluorescence at various
FITC loadings. (b–d) pH calibration curves of free FITC (b)
and F-UiO acquired by fluorimetry (c) and by CLSM (d). 488/435 in
the Y-axis represents I488/520/I435/520. (e) CLSM images showing the
overlay of green (488 nm excitation) and red (435 nm excitation) colors
of F-UiO particles in HBSS buffers with different pH values.
The ratiometric pH-sensitivity
of F-UiO was then determined and
compared with free FITC to confirm that F-UiO is an efficient pH sensor
with a rapid response. FITC acts as a pH sensor by providing pH-specific
ratios of fluorescence intensities at 520 nm when excited at 488 and
435 nm, respectively. pH calibrations for both free FITC solution
and F-UiO suspension were carried out in acetate and PBS buffers with
pH values ranging from 4.0 to 8.0 by fluorimetry. The 520 nm fluorescence
intensity ratios by exciting at 488 and 435 nm (I488/520/I435/520) were calculated,
and the correlation of fluorescence intensity ratio r to pH was established by nonlinear curve fitting with the following
equations (Figure 2b,c):where [H] stands for proton activity in eq 1. P1, P2, and Q1 are fitting parameters. Detailed derivations
of these equations are shown in the SI.Moreover, F-UiO was mixed with HBSS buffers with pH values ranging
from 4.0 to 8.0 and subjected to confocal laser scanning microscopy
(CLSM) imaging. The images of F-UiO were acquired using dual excitation
wavelengths, 488 and 435 nm, and analyzed by ImageJ to quantify the
fluorescence intensity of F-UiO particles. A calibration curve was
generated using the same fitting method as for the fluorimetric data
(Figures 2d,e and S17).As shown in Figure 2, the pH-dependent
changes
in the I488/520/I435/520 ratios remain the same for free FITC and F-UiO, indicating
that the FITC sensing function was completely preserved in F-UiO.
The open channels of F-UiO facilitate the rapid and free diffusion
of hydronium ions, allowing the rapid pH response of conjugated FITC.[36] The pH calibration curves of F-UiO acquired
by fluorimetry and CLSM were similar, verifying the validity of the
CLSM quantification method for subsequent live cell imaging studies.
The pH response of F-UiO exhibits high sensitivity and relatively
small deviations at pH = 5.0–7.0, the typical pH range for
cell culture media, cytosol, and endocytic compartments. The standard
deviations of pH were below 0.2 pH unit in this pH range. Thus, F-UiO
represents an excellent nanosensor for sensing pHi and
is ideally suited for real-time monitoring of endocytosis of NMOF
and endosome maturation.(a) Correlation between FITC absorbance and
fluorescence at various
FITC loadings. (b–d) pH calibration curves of free FITC (b)
and F-UiO acquired by fluorimetry (c) and by CLSM (d). 488/435 in
the Y-axis represents I488/520/I435/520. (e) CLSM images showing the
overlay of green (488 nm excitation) and red (435 nm excitation) colors
of F-UiO particles in HBSS buffers with different pH values.pH measurements of live cells
at fixed pH values were then performed
to confirm the validity of the pH calibration curve in vitro. Human
non-small cell lung cancerH460 cells were incubated with F-UiO in
HBSS for 2 h and then incubated with fresh pH clamping buffers containing
100 μM nigericin and with fixed pH values ranging from 4.0 to
8.0.[41] CLSM images were obtained with dual
excitation wavelengths, and the I488/520/I435/520 ratios of F-UiO particles inside
the cells clamped at different pH values were analyzed by ImageJ (Figure S18). The pH vs I488/520/I435/520 curve shown in Figure S19 fits well with the pH calibration
curve presented in Figure 2c, which further
validates the pH calibration curves established by both fluorimetry
and CLSM.The endocytosis of F-UiO in H460 cells was investigated.
The time-dependent
cellular uptake of F-UiO was quantified by inductively coupled plasma-mass
spectrometry (ICP-MS). Efficient cellular uptake was observed for
F-UiO in the first 30 min of incubation (Figure 3a). No significant difference was noticed between the uptake amounts
after incubating for 30 and 120 min, indicating rapid internalization
of F-UiO.
Figure 3
Cellular uptake and intracellular distribution of F-UiO in H460
cells. (a) Time-dependent cellular uptake of F-UiO in H460 cells determined
by ICP-MS. (b–d) High-resolution TEM image showing the distribution
and structural integrity of UiO NMOFs in the endosomes. Inset in (b)
is a zoomed-in view showing the UiO inside one endosome. (d) Zoomed-in
view showing the UiO NMOF marked by red circle in (c). Inset in (d)
is the FFT image showing the electron diffraction pattern of (d).
Bar represents 600, 200, and 20 nm in (b)–(d), respectively.
Cellular uptake and intracellular distribution of F-UiO in H460
cells. (a) Time-dependent cellular uptake of F-UiO in H460 cells determined
by ICP-MS. (b–d) High-resolution TEM image showing the distribution
and structural integrity of UiO NMOFs in the endosomes. Inset in (b)
is a zoomed-in view showing the UiO inside one endosome. (d) Zoomed-in
view showing the UiO NMOF marked by red circle in (c). Inset in (d)
is the FFT image showing the electron diffraction pattern of (d).
Bar represents 600, 200, and 20 nm in (b)–(d), respectively.The intracellular distribution
and stability of UiO NMOFs were
directly observed by TEM (Figures 3b–d
and S20). Upon entering the cells, UiO
NMOFs were distributed in the endosomes and maintained the structural
integrity (hexagonal plate-like structure) inside the endosomes. UiO
lattice fringes are clearly visible for endosome-trapped particles.
The distance between lattice fringes was measured to be 2.25 nm (Figure 3d), in agreement with the d110 value of 2.26 nm for the UiO structure. Fast Fourier Transform
(FFT) analysis of the endosome-trapped UiO NMOFs gave an electron
diffraction pattern that is consistent with that of pristine UiO NMOF
(Figure 3d), confirming that UiO NMOFs remain
crystalline inside endosomes. These results collectively demonstrate
that F-UiO is a reliable pHi sensor owing to its efficient
endocytosis and adequate stability inside cells.The luminal
pH of endocytic organelles is acidic, and acidification
constitutes an important part of endosome maturation.[42] Endosome maturation can be completed within 30 min, with
the pH dropping from ∼6.8 (early endosome) to ∼5.0 (late
endosome).[1,42] Because of the high sensitivity of F-UiO
in sensing pH ranging from 5.0 to 7.0 and its rapid and efficient
endocytosis, we surmised that F-UiO would be able to reveal the endosome
acidification process and its own intracellular fate. Live cell imaging
was thus performed to monitor the endocytosis of F-UiO (Figure 4). Images were acquired every 20 s using dual excitation
wavelengths (488 and 435 nm). The internalized F-UiO particles were
tracked, and the 488/435 fluorescence intensity ratios were quantified
by ImageJ. The pH of each individual endosome with F-UiO entrapment
was calculated using the pH calibration curve of F-UiO obtained by
CLSM (Figure 2c) and plotted against time.
F-UiO particles shown in region of interest (ROI) 1 and ROI 2 in Figure 4a and video 1 (SI) were
stuck on the cell membrane and were not internalized into the cells
as evidenced by the orthogonal view obtained from the Z-stack series
(Figure S21); the pH of these F-UiO particles
remained constant at ∼6.8–7.0 over time (Figure 4c). The pH values of ROI 3 and ROI 4 in video 1
and ROI 3 in video 2 dropped from ∼6.6–6.8 to ∼5.3–5.5
(Figure 4c), suggesting that these F-UiO particles
were entrapped in endosomes and experienced endosome maturation. Interestingly,
we also observed exocytosis of F-UiO: ROI 1 in Figure 4b and video 2 (SI) did not show
significant acidification in the first 300 s, and the F-UiO particles
were recycled back to the cell membrane and underwent exocytosis in
300 s. Five individual F-UiO particles were observed after exocytosis,
likely from one single endosome. Additionally, the pH of ROI 1 in
Figure 4b and video 2 (SI) was about 6.5 before exocytosis (Figure 4d), which was consistent with the pH for typical recycling
endosomes (pH 6.5). ROI 2 in Figure 4b and
video 2 also experienced exocytosis after about 500 s, and its pH
remained at ∼6.5 (Figure 4d). These
results suggest that sufficient endosome acidification is necessary
for intracellular trafficking of NMOFs. In the absence of the acidification
process, NMOFs undergo exocytosis mediated by recycling endosomes.[1]
Figure 4
Time relapse pH changes in individual endosomes. (a,b)
CLSM images
shown are overlays of DIC, green (488 nm excitation), and red (435
nm excitation). Each ROI was labeled with white circle and number.
Small images showing under each CLSM image are zoomed-in views of
overlays of green (488 nm excitation) and red (435 nm excitation)
for each ROI. The small images represent ROI 1 to ROI 4 (a, video
1 in SI) or ROI 1 to ROI 3 (b, video 2
in SI) from left to right. Bar: 10 μm.
(c,d) The pH evolution curve of each ROI was obtained by fitting the I488/520/I435/520 with the calibration curve. (c) and (d) were generated from (a)
and (b), respectively.
Time relapse pH changes in individual endosomes. (a,b)
CLSM images
shown are overlays of DIC, green (488 nm excitation), and red (435
nm excitation). Each ROI was labeled with white circle and number.
Small images showing under each CLSM image are zoomed-in views of
overlays of green (488 nm excitation) and red (435 nm excitation)
for each ROI. The small images represent ROI 1 to ROI 4 (a, video
1 in SI) or ROI 1 to ROI 3 (b, video 2
in SI) from left to right. Bar: 10 μm.
(c,d) The pH evolution curve of each ROI was obtained by fitting the I488/520/I435/520 with the calibration curve. (c) and (d) were generated from (a)
and (b), respectively.We also performed pHi measurements on fixed cells
that
had been incubated with F-UiO. The cells were incubated with F-UiO
for 5–20 min, fixed, and subjected to CLSM observation. The
pH values of individual endosome in cells incubated with F-UiO for
different time periods were analyzed to provide histograms showing
the numbers of endosomes of different pH values (Figures S22–S24). The endosome maturation evolved over
time, with the peak pH decreasing from 6.4 at 5 min to 5.6 at 20 min,
consistent with previously reported endosome maturation processes.[42]In conclusion, we report the first example
of NMOFs for real-time
intracellular pH sensing in live cells. FITC conjugated UiO NMOFs
exhibited desired structural stability, fluorescence efficiency, pH
response sensitivity, and efficient cellular uptake. By combining
all these advantages of F-UiO, this novel fluorescence nanosensor
provides a reliable and accurate method for real-time intracellular
pH sensing. Additionally, the present study also offers the first
insight into the endocytosis and intracellular trafficking process
of NMOFs.
Authors: Guang Lu; Omar K Farha; Lauren E Kreno; Paul M Schoenecker; Krista S Walton; Richard P Van Duyne; Joseph T Hupp Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Igor L Medintz; Michael H Stewart; Scott A Trammell; Kimihiro Susumu; James B Delehanty; Bing C Mei; Joseph S Melinger; Juan B Blanco-Canosa; Philip E Dawson; Hedi Mattoussi Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Hamidreza Mahdavi; Nathan T Eden; Cara M Doherty; Durga Acharya; Stefan J D Smith; Xavier Mulet; Matthew R Hill Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 10.383
Authors: Qingbo Yang; Alexandre Cristea; Charles Roberts; Kun Liu; Yang Song; Hai Xiao; Honglan Shi; Yinfa Ma Journal: Analyst Date: 2020-11-09 Impact factor: 4.616