Literature DB >> 25134943

Does the nephrostomy tract length impact the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL)?

Gaston M Astroza1, Andreas Neisius, Matvey Tsivian, Agnes J Wang, Glenn M Preminger, Michael E Lipkin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Different factors can determine the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). We analyzed the effect of tract length (TL) on outcomes after PNL.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing PNL between 2006 and 2011. Patients with preoperative computed tomography (CT), one percutaneous access tract and follow-up imaging within 3 months were included. TL was defined as distance between the skin to the calyx of puncture as measured on preoperative CT. Measurements were independently performed by two urologists and the average was used for analysis. Stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as zero fragments on follow-up imaging. Factors independently associated with the likelihood of being stone-free after PNL were determined using multivariable analysis adjusted for TL, location of access, the presence of incomplete or complete staghorn calculi and type of follow-up imaging. Complications (Clavien score) were independently assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were included. Median stone burden and body mass index (BMI) was 239.4 mm(2) and 30.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 25.7-36.2]. The median TL was 85.0 mm (IQR: 70.3-100.0) and highly correlated with BMI (ρ = 0.66, p < 0.001). A total of 101 patients (45.5 %) were stone-free. TL was not associated with SFR (p = 0.53). Clavien 1 and 2 complications occurred in 38 (17 %) while Clavien 3 and 4 complications occurred in 17 (8 %) patients. Multivariable analysis revealed no association between complications and TL even when adjusted for gender.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous TL is not associated with outcomes of PNL. PNL is a safe and effective treatment for stones in patients with differing body habitus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25134943     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0812-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  16 in total

1.  Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Glenn M Preminger; Dean G Assimos; James E Lingeman; Stephen Y Nakada; Margaret S Pearle; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement.

Authors:  Sutchin R Patel; Paul Stanton; Nathan Zelinski; Edward J Borman; Myron A Pozniak; Stephen Y Nakada; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  The Guy's stone score--grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures.

Authors:  Kay Thomas; Naomi C Smith; Nicholas Hegarty; Jonathan M Glass
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Comparative study of percutaneous access for staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Nelson Rodrigues Netto; Jean Ikonomidis; Osamu Ikari; Joaquim A Claro
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi.

Authors:  Zhamshid Okhunov; Justin I Friedlander; Arvin K George; Brian D Duty; Daniel M Moreira; Arun K Srinivasan; Joel Hillelsohn; Arthur D Smith; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones.

Authors:  Mahesh Desai; Antonello De Lisa; Burak Turna; Jorge Rioja; Helena Walfridsson; Alessandro D'Addessi; Carson Wong; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effect of body mass index.

Authors:  Ahmed M El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M Shoma; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud R El-Kenawy; Hamdy A El-Kappany
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Obesometric factors associated with increased skin-to-stone distances in renal stone patients.

Authors:  Christopher B Allard; Anatoly Shuster; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Forough Farrokhyar; A Raees; Michael Patlas; Edward D Matsumoto; J Paul Whelan
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.344

9.  Impact of body mass index on cost and clinical outcomes after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  Aditya Bagrodia; Amit Gupta; Jay D Raman; Karim Bensalah; Margaret S Pearle; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Imaging techniques for stone disease and methods for reducing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Michael E Lipkin; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 2.241

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current clinical scoring systems of percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Wayland J Wu; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Effects of Parenchymal Thickness and Stone Density Values on Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Outcomes.

Authors:  Mustafa Karalar; Emre Tuzel; Ibrahim Keles; Nazan Okur; Hasmet Sarici; Mutlu Ates
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-11-14

3.  Skin to calyx distance is not a predictive factor for miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Onur Kucuktopcu; Burak Ucpinar; Fatih Yanaral; Murat Binbay
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.