Literature DB >> 23177634

Imaging techniques for stone disease and methods for reducing radiation exposure.

Michael E Lipkin1, Glenn M Preminger.   

Abstract

Imaging plays a critical role in the evaluation of patients with urolithiasis. It is essential for the diagnosis of stones and provides important information to aide in determining the appropriate treatment of renal or ureteral calculi. Imaging for urolithiasis has evolved over the past 30 years. Currently, noncontrast computed tomography remains the first-line imaging modality for the evaluation of patients with suspected urolithiasis. Proper imaging modality selection helps to minimize radiation exposure. Following the principles of As Low As Reasonably Achievable in the operating room can help reduce the amount of radiation patients are exposed to from fluoroscopy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23177634     DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2012.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0094-0143            Impact factor:   2.241


  9 in total

1.  New developed urological protocols for the Uro Dyna-CT reduce radiation exposure of endourological patients below the levels of the low dose standard CT scans.

Authors:  M-C Rassweiler; R Banckwitz; C Koehler; B Mueller-Allissat; M-S Michel; A Häcker; M Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Urinary evaluation after RYGBP: a lithogenic profile with early postoperative increase in the incidence of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Antonio Carlos Valezi; Paulo Emilio Fuganti; Jorge Mali Junior; Vinicius Daher Delfino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Acute management of stones: when to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  Helene Jung; Palle J S Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones?

Authors:  Khurshid R Ghani; J Stuart Wolf; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Does the nephrostomy tract length impact the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL)?

Authors:  Gaston M Astroza; Andreas Neisius; Matvey Tsivian; Agnes J Wang; Glenn M Preminger; Michael E Lipkin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Predictors of radiation exposure to providers during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  David L Wenzler; Joel E Abbott; Jeannie J Su; William Shi; Richard Slater; Daniel Miller; Michelle J Siemens; Roger L Sur
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan; Syed M Nazim; Basit Salam; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-08-29

8.  Comparison of Nephrolithiasis Prevalence in Two Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) Populations.

Authors:  Cynthia R Smith; Stephanie Venn-Watson; Randall S Wells; Shawn P Johnson; Natalie Maffeo; Brian C Balmer; Eric D Jensen; Forrest I Townsend; Khashayar Sakhaee
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fabio C M Torricelli; Manoj Monga; Giovanni S Marchini; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.