Literature DB >> 25133096

TGF-β mediated DNA methylation in prostate cancer.

Chung Lee1, Qiang Zhang2, Xaolin Zi3, Atreya Dash3, Marcelo B Soares4, Farahnaz Rahmatpanah5, Zhenyu Jia5, Michael McClelland5, Dan Mercola5.   

Abstract

Almost all tumors harbor a defective negative feedback loop of signaling by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation, including DNA methylation, are fundamental to normal cellular function and also play a major role in carcinogenesis. Recent evidence demonstrated that TGF-β signaling mediates cancer development and progression. Many key events in TGF-β signaling in cancer included auto-induction of TGF-β1 and increased expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), suggesting that DNA methylation plays a significant role in cancer development and progression. In this review, we performed an extensive survey of the literature linking TGF-β signaling to DNA methylation in prostate cancer. It appeared that almost all DNA methylated genes detected in prostate cancer are directly or indirectly related to TGF-β signaling. This knowledge has provided a basis for our future directions of prostate cancer research and strategies for prevention and therapy for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; DNMT; Erk activation; TGF-β; prostate cancer; tumor development and progression

Year:  2012        PMID: 25133096      PMCID: PMC4131550          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2012.05.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


Introduction

The underlying mechanism promoting tumor progression has been elusive. Almost all tumors harbor a defective negative feedback loop of signaling by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). TGF-β signaling consists of Smad and non-Smad pathways (1). In advanced cancer cells, the non-Smad pathways predominate and progress leading to deregulated signaling cascades (2). This deregulation creates a unique TGF-β mediated tumor microenvironment that sets off a vicious cycle and promotes many of the hallmarks of tumor progression, including sustained angiogenesis, immune system evasion, proliferation, loss of the apoptotic response, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis. These combined effects lead to uncontrolled tumor growth and spread, for which we coin the term “TGF-β mediated vicious cycle in tumor progression”. Recent evidence demonstrated that TGF-β mediates aggressive cancer including auto-induction of TGF-β1 and increased expression of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) (2,3). This latter observation suggests that the expression of these methylated genes may be an important event in TGF-β mediated tumor progression.

DNA methylation in cancer

Epigenetic changes are characteristic of nearly all malignancies and include changes in DNA methylation, histone modification and altered expression of microRNAs. DNA methylation plays a critical role in cancer development and progression. Alteration of DNA methylation patterns leads to deregulation of gene expression, in the absence of mutation. In the past few years, there has been an explosion in the number of publications in DNA methylation in all types of cancers (900 papers as of March 2012), including representative publications in prostate cancer (4-7), bladder cancer (8), renal cell carcinoma (9), breast cancer (10), lung cancer (11), ovarian cancer (12), oral cancer (13), pancreatic cancer (14), and other cancers. All tumors that have been examined show changes in DNA methylation, suggesting that this may represent a basic element of cancer biology, which has a significant impact on tumor pathology. Readers are referred to many excellent reviews on the biology of DNA methylation (15-17). This increased interest in the study of DNA methylation has created an opportunity for us to query the relationship between TGF-β signaling and DNA methylation in cancer, which has not been appreciated to date.

Biology of TGF-β signaling

TGF-β is a potent pleiotropic cytokine that regulates mammalian development, differentiation, and homeostasis in essentially all cell types and tissues. Its signaling is mediated through Smad and non-Smad pathways to regulate transcription, translation, microRNA biogenesis, protein synthesis and post-translational modifications (1,18,19). TGF-β binds to the type II TGF-β receptor (TβRII) which recruits and transphosphorylates the type I TGF-β receptor (TβRI) (20). The activated TβRI then phosphorylates Smad2 and Smad3 at the c-terminus. Activated Smad2/3 forms heterooligomers with Smad4 and migrates to the nucleus to regulate transcription. The Smad complexes interact with a myriad of transcriptional co-regulators and other factors to mediate target gene expression or repression (21,22). Smad2/3 also interacts with and regulates microRNA processing. TGF-β also signals through a number of non-Samd pathways, including m-TOR, RhoA, Ras, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, PP2A/p70s6K, and JNK (1,23,24). Finally, a direct action of the activated TβRI can interact with eEF1A1 to block protein synthesis (19). Dysregulation of both Smad and non-Smad pathways is implicated in aberrant TGF-β signaling and its pro-tumorigenic events in advanced cancer (3).

TGF-β signaling and DNA methylation

TGF-β is a key regulator for DNA methylation through an increase in DNMTs expression, especially in cancer (3,12). There exists a differential effect of TGF-β mediated DNMT activities between benign and malignant cells. In benign cells, TGF-β inhibits DNMT expression (25,26). In cancer cells, TGF-β stimulates DNMT expression (3,12). It should be noted that, in light of the importance of both TGF-β signaling and DNA methylation in tumor progression, the majority of the methylated genes in cancer are relevant to TGF-β signaling (12). This is consistent with our observation that over-expression of TGF-β and/or DNMTs is associated with aggressiveness and poor prognosis in prostate cancer (3,27).

Review of literature

In this review, we will focus our discussion in prostate cancer as an example, because the pattern of DNA methylation is organ specific. We surveyed the recent literature to identify the existing methylated genes in prostate cancer and attempt to determine which ones are mediated by TGF-β signaling. We have identified over 80 genes in which promoters are methylated in prostate cancer. This is a significant increase from 2006, when only 30 genes had been identified (28). Interestingly, the non-Smad pathways of known relevance to TGF-β are more often associated with de novo gene methylation (3,29). In contrast, the Smad-mediated pathways often lead to promoter de-methylation of genes (see below). In , we summarize the known TGF-β relevant genes in which the promoter becomes methylated in prostate cancer. We also identified those which have been known to be induced by TGF-β. Since, in advanced cancer cells, TGF-β induces the activation of Erk, JNK, AKT, and NF-κB (1,3), the above methylated gene have been documented in the literature to be related with one of the above transcription factors, thus are considered as TGF-β relevant.
Table 1

Genes with known association with TGF-β that have DNA hypermethylation in prostate cancer

NameFunctionReference
1. TBRITGF-β receptor type I(30,31)
2. TBRIITGF-βTGF-β receptor type II(31,32)
3. cdh13herinAdhesion molecule, tumor suppressor(33,34)
4. TTP (tristetrapolin)Loss of TTP stabilizes c-Myc mRNA(35)
5. TGFBI (Betaig-h3)TGF-β induced gene(36-38)
6. IGFBP3IGF binding protein 3(39,40)
7. beta 4-integrinPromotes focal adhesion(34)
8. MALPromotes cell differentiation(41,42)
9. SLIT2Negative regulation of migration(36,41,43)
10. Bcl2Involved in apoptosis(40,41)
11. Caspase 8Pro-apoptotic gene(44)
12. EPHA7Tumor suppressor in prostate cancer(45-47)
13. BTG3Tumor suppressor(48,49)
14. PTGS2Pro-inflammatory enzyme(50-52)
15. HIN1 (or SCGB3A1)Tumor suppressor(41,53)
16. RASSF1ATumor suppressor gene(54-56)
17. CHD13Adhesion molecule(41,57,58)
18. p15, p16, p21, p27, p57Cell cycle regulators(57,59-61)
19. RASSF1APro-apoptotic, negative Ras effector(41,62)
20. TWIST1Suppressor of E-cadherin(41)
21. FHITInduces apoptosis though Bak(63,64)
22. SOCS3Negative regulator of cytokine(65,66)
23. TIMP-2, TIMP-3Inhibitors of metalloproteinase(67-69)
24. PITX2Activator of cyclin D2(41,70-72)
25. DcR1, DcR2Fail to induced apoptosis through TRAIL(73,74)
26. GLIPR1 (or RTVP-1)p53 target gene(75,76)
27. MGMTDNA repair gene(77-81)
28. DKK3 (SFRP1)Wnt antagonist(82,83)
29. RUNX3Tumor suppressor(84-86)
30. CAV-1Tumor suppressor(87,88)
31. ClusterinApoptotic protein(89-91)
32. TFPI2 (PP5, MSPI)A potent inhibitor of matrix-metalloproteinases(92,93)
33. SOX7Suppressor of β-catenin(94,95)
34. SLC5A8Tumor suppressor(96,97)
35. SLC18A2 (or VMAT2)Affects apoptosis and migration(98,99)
36. LPLTumor suppressor gene(100,101)
37. HRK (or ATF-2)Proapoptosis(102,103)
38. INHBBInhibin betaB(104,105)
39. ID4Inhibitor of DNA binding(41,106-108)
40. FYNPromotes proliferation and motility(109,110)
41. HPP1 (TMEFF2)TGF-β signal pathway(73,84)
42. RRADRas-related GTPases(111,112)
43. DRM/GremlinDown-regulated in Mos-transformed cells(73,84)
In addition, there are a few genes that are de-methylated and are mediated through Smad2/3 activation, such as α2 [1] collagen (113), CD133 (26), and maspin (or SFN, 14-3-3 sigma) (41,59,67,114,115). However, a reversal of the methylation status in these genes can be observed in cancer cells when the TGF-β signaling events switched from the Smad pathways to the non-Smad pathways in cancer cells as in the case for maspin (116) and CD133 (117). lists genes that are not currently documented in the literature as TGF-β relevant. However, TGF-β mediates an over-expression of DNMTs in cancer cells, which is responsible for promoter methylation of these genes and. in non-cancer cells, TGF-β down-regulates the expression of DNMTs (25,26).
Table 2

Methylated genes in prostate cancer whose regulation by TGF-β is not yet known

NameFunctionReference
1. HLAaHLA class-I antigen(41)
2. ERβEstrogen receptor(67)
3. ERαEstrogen reeptor(67)
4. ARAndrogen receptor(67)
5. RARβTumor suppressor(67)
6. DAPK1Regulate cell death(118)
7. MDR1Multi-drug resistant gene(41,119)
8. APCAntagonist of Wnt(41,119-121)
9. CD44Cell migration and adhesion(52,57)
10. MCAM (MUC18, CD146)In advanced PCa(41,122)
11. TIG1Retinoic acid receptor responder(41,123)
12. THRBThyroid hormone receptor B(41)
13. Laminin-5Role in adhesion and motility(124)
14. WIF1Wnt inhibitory factor(125-127)
15. TSLC1Tumor suppressor(128)
16. RIZ1Rb-interacting zinc finger gene 1(73,129)
17. Cyclin D2 (or CCND2)Regulate cell cycle(54,67,130)
18. GSTP1Cell detoxification(4,7,121,131)
19. PDLIM4Actin binding protein, tumor suppressor(41,132)
20. Sprouty1negative regulators of MAPK/PI3K(133)
21. ZNF331Tumor suppressor(134)
22. TMS1(ASC, PYCARD)Induces apoptosis by caspase(57,73,135)
23. GPX3Anti-oxidant(82,119
24. NKX2.5Repress calreticulin expression(41)
25. NKX3.1Promotes normal differentiation(136)
26. DPYSSensitivity to 5-FU(41,137)
27. ENDRBEndothelin receptor type B(5,41)
28. CADM2Cell adhesion molecule(138)
29. XAF1Interference with caspase inhibition of XIAP(139-141)
30. CRBP1Cellular retinol binding protein, promotes apoptosis(73,142)
31. FAS (TNFRSF6, APT1, CD95/Apo-1)Induces apoptosis(143)
32. RPRMInhibits Cdc2-cyclin b1 activity(73,123)
33. GSTM1Detoxification(82)
34. EPB41L3Erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 3(28)
35. SCTRGene encoding the secretin receptor(105)
36. SOCS1Negative regulator of cytokine(73,84)
37. HICTumor suppressor(79,81)

DNA methylation associated with tumor initiation and progression

A characteristic of DNA methylation in cancer is its heterogeneity. Despite of this variation, some trends can be discerned. We rationalize that genes that are wildly methylated are likely involved during early stages of tumor development, such as GSTP-1 (4), which may be used for the early detection of prostate cancer. Many investigators have used specific methylation pattern for prediction of cancer progression. However, during progression of prostate cancer, the tumor becomes increasingly heterogeneous, it will be difficult to pinpoint which genes are methylated that can be used as a prognostic marker and such efforts have been met with mixed results (144). It is reasonable to assume that as tumors progress, there will be more genes that undergo promoter methylation and demethylation. Therefore, the development of a rapid analysis of DNA methylation profile make it possible to follow the methylation patterns which may be used as an indication of disease progression.

Conclusions and future directions

Based on the present review, it is apparent that TGF-β signaling and DNA methylation are two important events in prostate cancer development and progression. In tumor progression, the deregulated TGF-β signaling mediates an increase in the number of genes undergoing DNA hypermethylation. These genes are generally associated with prevention of apoptosis, promotion of proliferation, facilitation of cell migration and evasion of the immune surveillance, resulting in tumor progression. In the era of personalized medicine, it becomes more important that we clearly define which genes are affected by TGF-β signaling and which genes are promoter hypermethylated during prostate cancer progression. Recent reports point out that some dietary and lifestyle interventions in cancer patients are mainly mediated through a reduction in DNA methylation (125,145,146), while others may lead to both gains and losses (147). It is possible that these dietary and lifestyle factors may be mediated at least partly through a normalization of the vicious cycle of TGF-β signaling in cancer microenvironment (148).
  148 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus.

Authors:  Yigong Shi; Joan Massagué
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Caveolin-1 regulates transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta/SMAD signaling through an interaction with the TGF-beta type I receptor.

Authors:  B Razani; X L Zhang; M Bitzer; G von Gersdorff; E P Böttinger; M P Lisanti
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Review: molecular pathology of cyclooxygenase-2 in cancer-induced angiogenesis.

Authors:  E Fosslien
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.256

4.  Increased sensitivity of transforming growth factor (TGF) beta 1 null cells to alkylating agents reveals a novel link between TGFbeta signaling and O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase promoter hypermethylation.

Authors:  H Yamada; K Vijayachandra; C Penner; A Glick
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Hypermethylation of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily 6 (APT1, Fas, CD95/Apo-1) gene promoter at rel/nuclear factor kappaB sites in prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  S Santourlidis; U Warskulat; A R Florl; S Maas; T Pulte; J Fischer; W Müller; W A Schulz
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.784

6.  Hypermethylation of the caveolin-1 gene promoter in prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Cui; L R Rohr; G Swanson; V O Speights; T Maxwell; A R Brothman
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Altered methylation of multiple genes in carcinogenesis of the prostate.

Authors:  Mikio Yamanaka; Masatoshi Watanabe; Yasushi Yamada; Akimitsu Takagi; Tetsuya Murata; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Haruo Ito; Hiromasa Tsukino; Takahiko Katoh; Yoshiki Sugimura; Taizo Shiraishi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  cDNA cloning and sequence analysis of beta ig-h3, a novel gene induced in a human adenocarcinoma cell line after treatment with transforming growth factor-beta.

Authors:  J Skonier; M Neubauer; L Madisen; K Bennett; G D Plowman; A F Purchio
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.311

9.  Promoter methylation of TSLC1 and tumor suppression by its gene product in human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fukuhara; Masami Kuramochi; Takeshi Fukami; Kohtaro Kasahara; Mutsuo Furuhata; Takahiro Nobukuni; Tomoko Maruyama; Kana Isogai; Takao Sekiya; Taro Shuin; Tadaichi Kitamura; Roger H Reeves; Yoshinori Murakami
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2002-06

10.  DNA hypermethylation status of multiple genes in prostate adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Noboru Konishi; Mitsutoshi Nakamura; Munehiro Kishi; Masayoshi Nishimine; Eiwa Ishida; Keiji Shimada
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  Genomic profiling screens small molecules of metastatic prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Axiang Xu; Shengkun Sun
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  OCIAD2 suppressed tumor growth and invasion via AKT pathway in Hepatocelluar carcinoma.

Authors:  Dan Wu; Xufang Yang; Huiming Peng; Dongmin Guo; Weiling Zhao; Chen Zhao; Xiaobo Zhou
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Hepatitis viruses exploitation of host DNA methyltransferases functions.

Authors:  Valerio Pazienza; Concetta Panebianco; Angelo Andriulli
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Genome-wide DNA methylation identifies trophoblast invasion-related genes: Claudin-4 and Fucosyltransferase IV control mobility via altering matrix metalloproteinase activity.

Authors:  Yuxiang Hu; John D Blair; Ryan K C Yuen; Wendy P Robinson; Peter von Dadelszen
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Anacardic acid (6-pentadecylsalicylic acid) induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells through inhibition of androgen receptor and activation of p53 signaling.

Authors:  Jing Tan; Binghai Chen; Leye He; Yuxin Tang; Zhiqiang Jiang; Guangmin Yin; Jinrong Wang; Xianzhen Jiang
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  TGF-β1 epigenetically modifies Thy-1 expression in primary lung fibroblasts.

Authors:  Wendy A Neveu; Stephen T Mills; Bashar S Staitieh; Viranuj Sueblinvong
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.249

7.  Identification of Predictive DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Chemotherapy Response in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Rashidah Baharudin; Nurul-Syakima Ab Mutalib; Sri N Othman; Ismail Sagap; Isa M Rose; Norfilza Mohd Mokhtar; Rahman Jamal
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  CRISPR-Mediated Reactivation of DKK3 Expression Attenuates TGF-β Signaling in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hoda Kardooni; Estela Gonzalez-Gualda; Emmanouil Stylianakis; Sina Saffaran; Jonathan Waxman; Robert M Kypta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  What Do We Have to Know about PD-L1 Expression in Prostate Cancer? A Systematic Literature Review. Part 3: PD-L1, Intracellular Signaling Pathways and Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Andrea Palicelli; Stefania Croci; Alessandra Bisagni; Eleonora Zanetti; Dario De Biase; Beatrice Melli; Francesca Sanguedolce; Moira Ragazzi; Magda Zanelli; Alcides Chaux; Sofia Cañete-Portillo; Maria Paola Bonasoni; Alessandra Soriano; Stefano Ascani; Maurizio Zizzo; Carolina Castro Ruiz; Antonio De Leo; Guido Giordano; Matteo Landriscina; Giuseppe Carrieri; Luigi Cormio; Daniel M Berney; Jatin Gandhi; Valerio Copelli; Giuditta Bernardelli; Giacomo Santandrea; Martina Bonacini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Effects of sulforaphane and 3,3'-diindolylmethane on genome-wide promoter methylation in normal prostate epithelial cells and prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Carmen P Wong; Anna Hsu; Alex Buchanan; Zoraya Palomera-Sanchez; Laura M Beaver; E Andres Houseman; David E Williams; Roderick H Dashwood; Emily Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.