Literature DB >> 25132942

Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology.

Sang Hoon Song1, Kun Suk Kim1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic procedures for urological diseases in children have been proven to be safe and effective. However, the availability of laparoscopic procedures is still partly limited to experienced, high-volume centers because the procedures are technically demanding. The da Vinci robot system is being used for an increasing variety of reconstructive procedures because of the advantages of this approach, such as motion scaling, greater optical magnification, stereoscopic vision, increased instrument tip dexterity, and tremor filtration. Particularly in pediatric urologic surgery, where the operational field is limited owing to the small abdominal cavity of children, robotic surgical technology has its own strengths. Currently, robots are used to perform most surgeries in children that can be performed laparoscopically. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current role of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in Pediatric Urology by analyzing the published data in this field. A growing body of evidence supports the view that robotic technology is technically feasible and safe in pediatric urological surgery. Robotic technology provides additional benefits for performing reconstructive urologic surgery, such as in pyeloplasty, ureteral reimplantation, and enterocystoplasty procedures. The main limitations to robotic surgery are its high purchase and maintenance costs and that the cost-effectiveness of this technology remains to be validated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimal invasive surgery; Pediatrics; Robotics; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25132942      PMCID: PMC4131076          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.8.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  36 in total

1.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach.

Authors:  Giovanni S Marchini; Young Kwon Hong; Brian J Minnillo; David A Diamond; Constance S Houck; Petra M Meier; Carlo C Passerotti; Joshua R Kaplan; Alan B Retik; Hiep T Nguyen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Robotic paediatric urology.

Authors:  Marcelo A Orvieto; Michael Large; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation: outcomes and conclusions from 78 ureters.

Authors:  Ardavan Akhavan; Daniel Avery; Thomas S Lendvay
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.830

4.  Extravesical robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: initial experience in Japan with the ureteral advancement technique.

Authors:  Yutaro Hayashi; Kentaro Mizuno; Satoshi Kurokawa; Akihiro Nakane; Hideyuki Kamisawa; Hidenori Nishio; Yoshinobu Moritoki; Keiichi Tozawa; Kenjiro Kohri; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.

Authors:  Sean T O'Brien; Aseem R Shukla
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  Continence outcomes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy.

Authors:  Mark A Wille; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The first decade of robotic surgery in children.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Kunal Shetty; James Clark; Tou Pin Chang; Kumuthan Sriskandarajah; Nicholas E Gattas; Azad Najmaldin; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  C A Peters; R N Schlussel; A B Retik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Trends in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients.

Authors:  M Francesca Monn; Clinton D Bahler; Eric B Schneider; Benjamin M Whittam; Rosalia Misseri; Richard C Rink; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.

Authors:  Pankaj P Dangle; James Kearns; Blake Anderson; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Our experiences with robot- assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients: the first case series from Turkey.

Authors:  Yusuf Kibar; Serdar Yalçın; Engin Kaya; Burak Köprü; Turgay Ebiloğlu; Giray Ergin; Hüseyin Tomruk
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-01

Review 2.  Lessons learned over a decade of pediatric robotic ureteral reimplantation.

Authors:  Minki Baek; Chester J Koh
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-01-09

Review 3.  Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Gayatri R Bankar; Ajay Keoliya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-15

4.  Relative to open surgery, minimally-invasive renal and ureteral pediatric surgery offers no improvement in 30-day complications, yet requires longer operative time: Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatrics.

Authors:  Marc Colaco; Austin Hester; William Visser; Alison Rasper; Ryan Terlecki
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-04-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.