Literature DB >> 23522294

Trends in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in pediatric patients.

M Francesca Monn1, Clinton D Bahler, Eric B Schneider, Benjamin M Whittam, Rosalia Misseri, Richard C Rink, Chandru P Sundaram.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasties (RALPs) and to determine if there were regional or age-related trends associated with the performance of RALP.
METHODS: Using 2005-2010 data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), the incidence of and trends in pyeloplasty in patients less than 18 years of age were assessed. This was broken down by open, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques when possible. Multiple logistic regression determined which characteristics were associated with increased performance of RALP. Population weighting was used to estimate national rates.
RESULTS: A total of 15,498 pediatric pyeloplasties were performed between 2005 and 2010. Coding for robotics began at the end of 2008, and, since then, 750 of the 5557 pediatric pyeloplasties were robotic. The rate of RALP remained unchanged from 2008-2010 (odds ratio [OR] 0.93, P = .051); however, there was an overall increase in minimally invasively procedures (RALP or laparoscopic) since 2005 (OR 1.4, P <.001). Factors associated with increased performance of RALP were aged above 11 years (OR 50.3, P <.001) and living in the northeast (OR 3.0, P = .001), midwest (OR 2.9, P = .001), or west (OR 4.31, P <.001) compared with the south.
CONCLUSION: An estimated 750 robotic pyeloplasties were performed in the United States between the end of 2008 and 2010. There was an increase in the total number of pyeloplasties performed using minimally invasive techniques since 2005. Older children are more likely and patients living in the south are less likely to be treated with robotic assistance.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522294     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  15 in total

1.  Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions.

Authors:  Yvonne Y Chan; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Renea M Sturm; Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population: a review of technique, outcomes, complications, and special considerations in infants.

Authors:  William R Boysen; Mohan S Gundeti
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Ye Wang; Benjamin I Chung; Richard S Lee; Michael P Kurtz; Caleb P Nelson; Steven L Chang
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 4.  Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Song; Kun Suk Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-08-08

5.  Validated cost comparison of open vs. robotic pyeloplasty in American children's hospitals.

Authors:  William E Bennett; Benjamin M Whittam; Konrad M Szymanski; Richard C Rink; Mark P Cain; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-10-20

Review 6.  Comparing the efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus open pyeloplasty in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shang-Jen Chang; Chun-Kai Hsu; Cheng-Hsing Hsieh; Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Briony K Varda; Emilie K Johnson; Curtis Clark; Benjamin I Chung; Caleb P Nelson; Steven L Chang
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Robotic surgery in children: adopt now, await, or dismiss?

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Hani J Marcus; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Sanjeev Khurana; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty as minimally invasive alternatives to the open approach for the treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants: a multi-institutional comparison of outcomes and learning curves.

Authors:  C Andolfi; A M Lombardo; J Aizen; X Recabal; J P Walker; N S Barashi; F Reed; P J Lopez; D T Wilcox; M S Gundeti
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Trends in the Rates of Pediatric Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction over 19 Years: A PHIS Database Study.

Authors:  Ardavan Akhavan; Paul A Merguerian; Cindy Larison; Adam B Goldin; Margarett Shnorhavorian
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.