Literature DB >> 25132217

An automated protocol for performance benchmarking a widefield fluorescence microscope.

Michael Halter1, Elianna Bier, Paul C DeRose, Gregory A Cooksey, Steven J Choquette, Anne L Plant, John T Elliott.   

Abstract

Widefield fluorescence microscopy is a highly used tool for visually assessing biological samples and for quantifying cell responses. Despite its widespread use in high content analysis and other imaging applications, few published methods exist for evaluating and benchmarking the analytical performance of a microscope. Easy-to-use benchmarking methods would facilitate the use of fluorescence imaging as a quantitative analytical tool in research applications, and would aid the determination of instrumental method validation for commercial product development applications. We describe and evaluate an automated method to characterize a fluorescence imaging system's performance by benchmarking the detection threshold, saturation, and linear dynamic range to a reference material. The benchmarking procedure is demonstrated using two different materials as the reference material, uranyl-ion-doped glass and Schott 475 GG filter glass. Both are suitable candidate reference materials that are homogeneously fluorescent and highly photostable, and the Schott 475 GG filter glass is currently commercially available. In addition to benchmarking the analytical performance, we also demonstrate that the reference materials provide for accurate day to day intensity calibration. Published 2014 Wiley Periodicals Inc. Published 2014 Wiley Periodicals Inc. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmark; calibration; cell measurement; high content screening; image cytometer; instrument qualification; quantitative microscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25132217     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  13 in total

1.  Standardization of high content imaging and informatics.

Authors:  O Joseph Trask; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.738

2.  Fidelity test for through-focus or volumetric type of optical imaging methods.

Authors:  Ravi Kiran Attota
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  A theoretical-experimental methodology for assessing the sensitivity of biomedical spectral imaging platforms, assays, and analysis methods.

Authors:  Silas J Leavesley; Brenner Sweat; Caitlyn Abbott; Peter Favreau; Thomas C Rich
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.207

4.  Strategies for robust and accurate experimental approaches to quantify nanomaterial bioaccumulation across a broad range of organisms.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Monika Mortimer; Robert M Burgess; Richard Handy; Shannon Hanna; Kay T Ho; Monique Johnson; Susana Loureiro; Henriette Selck; Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; David Spurgeon; Jason Unrine; Nico van den Brink; Ying Wang; Jason White; Patricia Holden
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2019

5.  Through-focus or volumetric type of optical imaging methods: a review.

Authors:  Ravikiran Attota
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 6.  Recent advances in the standardization of fluorescence microscopy for quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-11-16

7.  Survey statistics of automated segmentations applied to optical imaging of mammalian cells.

Authors:  Peter Bajcsy; Antonio Cardone; Joe Chalfoun; Michael Halter; Derek Juba; Marcin Kociolek; Michael Majurski; Adele Peskin; Carl Simon; Mylene Simon; Antoine Vandecreme; Mary Brady
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Comet Assay: Automated Imaging Methods for Improved Analysis and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Signe Braafladt; Vytas Reipa; Donald H Atha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Practical application of microsphere samples for benchmarking a quantitative phase imaging system.

Authors:  Edward Kwee; Alexander Peterson; Michael Halter; John Elliott
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 4.714

10.  Large-scale time-lapse microscopy of Oct4 expression in human embryonic stem cell colonies.

Authors:  Kiran Bhadriraju; Michael Halter; Julien Amelot; Peter Bajcsy; Joe Chalfoun; Antoine Vandecreme; Barbara S Mallon; Kye-Yoon Park; Subhash Sista; John T Elliott; Anne L Plant
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 2.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.