Literature DB >> 25129565

Concordance of the SHEA-IDSA severity classification for Clostridium difficile infection and the ATLAS bedside scoring system in hospitalized adult patients.

D W Mulherin1, A M Hutchison, G J Thomas, R A Hansen, D T Childress.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA-IDSA) guidelines for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) recommend initial treatment of CDI based on disease severity. This severity definition has not been validated or evaluated based on clinical outcomes. The ATLAS scoring system is a validated tool useful in predicting treatment response and mortality in CDI. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the concordance of the ATLAS scoring system and the SHEA-IDSA staging for CDI severity.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study which included hospitalized patients with confirmed CDI. Bivariate analyses compared baseline demographics and clinical information between patients with nonsevere and severe CDI based on the SHEA-IDSA criteria for CDI severity. Kappa scores were calculated to compare the concordance of the two scoring systems in defining CDI severity. Sensitivity and specificity of the ATLAS scoring system to determine CDI severity were calculated using the SHEA-IDSA criteria as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Of those, 62.5% were classified as mild to moderate CDI, 25% were severe, uncomplicated, and 12.5% were severe, complicated based on SHEA-IDSA criteria. In the bivariate analyses, ATLAS score breakpoints of ≥ 4, ≥ 5, and ≥ 6 revealed moderate agreement with the SHEA-IDSA classification for severity. The sensitivities and specificities for ATLAS scores in predicting CDI severity ranged from 58.3 to 87.5, and 67.5-87.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The ATLAS score may be useful in evaluating CDI severity and determining drug therapy selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25129565     DOI: 10.1007/s15010-014-0671-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile infection: update on emerging antibiotic treatment options and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Dhara Shah; Minh-Duc Dang; Rodrigo Hasbun; Hoonmo L Koo; Zhi-Dong Jiang; Herbert L DuPont; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Predicting a complicated course of Clostridium difficile infection at the bedside.

Authors:  M P M Hensgens; O M Dekkers; A Goorhuis; S LeCessie; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA).

Authors:  Stuart H Cohen; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Ciaran P Kelly; Vivian G Loo; L Clifford McDonald; Jacques Pepin; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity.

Authors:  Fred A Zar; Srinivasa R Bakkanagari; K M L S T Moorthi; Melinda B Davis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Predictors of Clostridium difficile infection severity in patients hospitalised in medical intensive care.

Authors:  Nagham Khanafer; Abdoulaye Touré; Cécile Chambrier; Martin Cour; Marie-Elisabeth Reverdy; Laurent Argaud; Philippe Vanhems
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003.

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; Maria Owings; Daniel B Jernigan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Derivation and validation of a simple clinical bedside score (ATLAS) for Clostridium difficile infection which predicts response to therapy.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Thomas Louie; Kathleen Mullane; Karl Weiss; Arnold Lentnek; Yoav Golan; Yin Kean; Pam Sears
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.090

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection in a patient with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Kosaku Nanki; Shinta Mizuno; Katsuyoshi Matsuoka; Keiko Ono; Shinya Sugimoto; Hiroki Kiyohara; Mari Arai; Moeko Nakashima; Kozue Takeshita; Keiichiro Saigusa; Mitsutoshi Senoh; Tadashi Fukuda; Makoto Naganuma; Haru Kato; Wataru Suda; Masahira Hattori; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2018-01-18

2.  Prediction of in-hospital mortality of Clostriodiodes difficile infection using critical care database: a big data-driven, machine learning approach.

Authors:  Hao Du; Kewin Tien Ho Siah; Valencia Zhang Ru-Yan; Readon Teh; Christopher Yu En Tan; Wesley Yeung; Christina Scaduto; Sarah Bolongaita; Maria Teresa Kasunuran Cruz; Mengru Liu; Xiaohao Lin; Yan Yuan Tan; Mengling Feng
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11

3.  Correlation between fecal calprotectin levels, disease severity and the hypervirulent ribotype 027 strain in patients with Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Avi Peretz; Linda Tkhawkho; Nina Pastukh; Diana Brodsky; Chen Namimi Halevi; Orna Nitzan
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Impact of the use of local fidaxomicin treatment algorithms for managing Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients in southeastern United States.

Authors:  Jonathan C Cho; Sandy J Estrada; Jamie J Kisgen; Angelina Davis; Laura Puzniak
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Development and validation of a simple and robust model to predict 30-day mortality in patients with Clostridioides difficile-associated enterocolitis.

Authors:  Katrin Claudia Katzer; Stefan Hagel; Philipp Alexander Reuken; Tony Bruns; Andreas Stallmach
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.