Literature DB >> 25125642

Integrated metagenomics and metatranscriptomics analyses of root-associated soil from transgenic switchgrass.

Archana Chauhan1, Abby Smartt, Jun Wang, Sagar Utturkar2, Ashley Frank3, Meng Bi3, Jiang Liu3, Daniel Williams4, Tingting Xu, Melanie Eldridge4, Andres Arreaza4, Alexandra Rogers4, Hector Castro Gonzalez5, Alice C Layton, Holly L Baxter, Mitra Mazarei, Jennifer M DeBruyn6, C Neal Stewart, Steven D Brown, Loren J Hauser, Gary S Sayler1.   

Abstract

The benefits of using transgenic switchgrass with decreased levels of caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase (COMT) as biomass feedstock have been clearly demonstrated. However, its effect on the soil microbial community has not been assessed. Here we report metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses of root-associated soil from COMT switchgrass compared with nontransgenic counterparts.
Copyright © 2014 Chauhan et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25125642      PMCID: PMC4132618          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00777-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The use of transgenic crops in agriculture continues to increase worldwide, with uses in energy and environmental applications. One potential largely unexplored effect of growing transgenic plants is the alteration of indigenous soil microbial communities (1, 2). Since soil microorganisms play a key role in the global nutrient cycling and maintenance of soil structure (3), alteration of microbial community diversity or activity might have significant effects on the soil ecology and biogeochemical processes. The results of previous studies of soil microbes associated with transgenic plants used non-sequencing-based methods and were of limited scope (4, 5). In this study, we performed metagenomics and metatranscriptomics investigations of soil microbial communities associated with transgenic switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), in which the endogenous caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene was downregulated (6). The field-grown transgenic plants had altered lignin, higher saccharification, and 50% more biofuel production per hectare when grown in Knoxville, TN, USA (6). In addition, greenhouse-grown transgenic switchgrass yielded more ethanol with the use of consolidated bioprocessing (7). Soil samples were collected from 12 plots (6 each planted with transgenic and nontransgenic plants) on 20 November 2012 from year 2 of the aforementioned field study (6). Soil cores were collected 15 cm from the plants and composited to a depth of 35 cm from the soil surface. Plant roots were gently removed from bulk soil. Soil clinging to the roots was analyzed further. DNA was extracted using the Fast DNA spin kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA). Total RNA was isolated using an RNA PowerSoil total RNA isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA). rRNA depletion was performed using a Ribo-Zero rRNA removal kit (Bacteria) (Epicenter, WI) and/or Nugen ovation technology (NuGEN Technologies, CA). Metagenomic and metatranscriptomics libraries were prepared using an Illumina Nextera DNA library preparation kit and a Truseq RNA v. 2 kit, respectively (Illumina, Inc., CA) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform in triplicate (biological samples), yielding ~117 Gb of metagenomic and ~53 Gb of metatranscriptomic data. Raw sequence reads from 32 metagenomic and 13 metatranscriptomic datasets were submitted to the MG-RAST v. 3.3.7 (8) server for downstream analyses. Shotgun sequences were also assembled using Metavelvet (9) and contigs were uploaded to JGI’s IMG/M (10) and MG-RAST pipelines for annotation and analyses. The GC percentages ranged from 64 ± 2% to 66 ± 5%. Metagenomes consisted of ~97% bacteria, ~1% archaea, and ~1 to 2% eukaryota. The major phyla were Proteobacteria (40 to 43%), Actinobacteria (16 to 25%), Acidobacteria (3 to 8%), Firmicutes (6 to 8%), Chloroflexi (3 to 5%), Planctomycetes (3 to 4%), Cyanobacteria (2 to 4%), Bacteroidetes (2 to 3%), Germmatimonadetes (1%), and Nitrospirae (0.2 to 0.8%). Analysis of variance showed no statistical difference in the major phyla between transgenic and nontransgenic plant soils. Relative abundances of major taxonomic groups were similar in the DNA and cDNA libraries. These datasets provide information on the potential long-term effects of transgenic crops on the soil microbial populations. In addition, the systematic and replicated analyses allow direct comparison between the transgenic and nontransgenic counterparts.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

Nucleotide sequences obtained were deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number SRP044193.
  9 in total

Review 1.  The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  L L Wolfenbarger; P R Phifer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Transgenic tobacco revealing altered bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere during early plant development.

Authors:  Fernando D Andreote; Rodrigo Mendes; Francisco Dini-Andreote; Priscilla B Rossetto; Carlos A Labate; Aline A Pizzirani-Kleiner; Jan Dirck van Elsas; João L Azevedo; Welington L Araújo
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings.

Authors:  Moonsuk Hur; Yongho Kim; Hae-Ryong Song; Jong Min Kim; Young Im Choi; Hana Yi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Two-year field analysis of reduced recalcitrance transgenic switchgrass.

Authors:  Holly L Baxter; Mitra Mazarei; Nicole Labbe; Lindsey M Kline; Qunkang Cheng; Mark T Windham; David G J Mann; Chunxiang Fu; Angela Ziebell; Robert W Sykes; Miguel Rodriguez; Mark F Davis; Jonathan R Mielenz; Richard A Dixon; Zeng-Yu Wang; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 9.803

Review 5.  Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H2, CO, CH4, OCS, N2O, and NO).

Authors:  R Conrad
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-12

6.  MetaVelvet: an extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads.

Authors:  Toshiaki Namiki; Tsuyoshi Hachiya; Hideaki Tanaka; Yasubumi Sakakibara
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes.

Authors:  F Meyer; D Paarmann; M D'Souza; R Olson; E M Glass; M Kubal; T Paczian; A Rodriguez; R Stevens; A Wilke; J Wilkening; R A Edwards
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  IMG 4 version of the integrated microbial genomes comparative analysis system.

Authors:  Victor M Markowitz; I-Min A Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Ken Chu; Ernest Szeto; Manoj Pillay; Anna Ratner; Jinghua Huang; Tanja Woyke; Marcel Huntemann; Iain Anderson; Konstantinos Billis; Neha Varghese; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Consolidated bioprocessing of transgenic switchgrass by an engineered and evolved Clostridium thermocellum strain.

Authors:  Kelsey L Yee; Miguel Rodriguez; Olivia A Thompson; Chunxiang Fu; Zeng-Yu Wang; Brian H Davison; Jonathan R Mielenz
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 6.040

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Identification of Major Rhizobacterial Taxa Affected by a Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Line via Shotgun Metagenomic Approach.

Authors:  Gui-Hua Lu; Xiao-Mei Hua; Li Liang; Zhong-Ling Wen; Mei-Hang Du; Fan-Fan Meng; Yan-Jun Pang; Jin-Liang Qi; Cheng-Yi Tang; Yong-Hua Yang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  A 2-year field trial reveals no significant effects of GM high-methionine soybean on the rhizosphere bacterial communities.

Authors:  Jingang Liang; Yue Jiao; Ying Luan; Shi Sun; Cunxiang Wu; Haiying Wu; Mingrong Zhang; Haifeng Zhang; Xiaobo Zheng; Zhengguang Zhang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Effects of field-grown transgenic switchgrass carbon inputs on soil organic carbon cycling.

Authors:  Sutie Xu; Sarah L Ottinger; Sean M Schaeffer; Jennifer M DeBruyn; C Neal Stewart; Mitra Mazarei; Sindhu Jagadamma
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.