Literature DB >> 25119537

[Femoral nailing using a helical nail shape (LFN(®))].

J R Rether1, D Höntzsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Antegrade femoral nailing through a greater trochanteric entry portal avoids damage to the proximal external rotators and to the ramus profundus of the medial femoral circumflex artery, furthermore eases insertion in adipose subjects. However a helical nail shape is necessary for this pathway because bending in two perpendicular planes has to be passed by the nail. INDICATIONS: All femoral shaft fractures suitable for antegrade nailing (type 32-A/B/C). Additional femoral neck fractures (type 31-B) by using proximal Recon-interlocking screws. CONTRAINDICATIONS: The common contraindications for femoral nailing. In certain subtrochanteric fractures (Type 32-A/B) the proximal femoral nail may be favorable. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: General or spinal anesthesia. Supine position with flexion/abduction of the contralateral leg in order to facilitate fluoroscopy of the proximal femur in a true lateral view. Closed reduction of length and axis. Measurement of length and diameter of the nail using a radiolucent ruler. Dorsolateral approach to the greater trochanter. Insertion of the guide wire 10 mm lateral to the trochanteric tip (anteroposterior view) and in the middle third of the trochanter (lateral view). Reaming of the insertion point using a flexible reamer. If reaming of the entire medullary canal is desired, this should be done using a long intramedullary guide wire in combination with a long flexible reamer. Insertion of the nail starts in an anterior position and ends in a lateral position of the insertion instrument, so a 90° external rotation of the nail occurs during insertion. Proximal interlocking is performed using the guide of the insertion instrument. Check interfragmentary rotation. Distal interlocking using a radiolucent drill device. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Depends on the fracture shape: stable interfragmentary support may allow early full weight bearing. Otherwise, reduced weight bearing is recommended for at least 6 weeks.
RESULTS: In a prospective mulicentric study, 227 helical femoral nails were used for antegrade femoral nailing. Follow-up after 12 month was available in 74 %. Surgeons' rating for ease of identifying entry site was excellent or good in 89 %. Functional and radiological results after 12 months do not prove significant benefits over conventional antegrade femoral nails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119537     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-011-0125-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  11 in total

1.  Entry point soft tissue damage in antegrade femoral nailing: a cadaver study.

Authors:  C Dora; M Leunig; M Beck; D Rothenfluh; R Ganz
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  The comparison of femoral curves and curves of contemporary intramedullary nails.

Authors:  Ahmet Harma; Burak Germen; Hakki Muammer Karakas; Nurzat Elmali; Muharrem Inan
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Femoral nailing through the trochanter: the reamer pathway indicates a helical nail shape.

Authors:  Larry W Ehmke; Britton M I Polzin; Stephen M Madey; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing.

Authors:  C M Ansari Moein; M H J Verhofstad; R L A W Bleys; Chr van der Werken
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.414

5.  Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip.

Authors:  C M Ansari Moein; M H J Verhofstad; R L A W Bleys; Chr van der Werken
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  A critical analysis of the eccentric starting point for trochanteric intramedullary femoral nailing.

Authors:  Robert F Ostrum; Andrew Marcantonio; Robert Marburger
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  [Experiences with a helical femoral nail (LFN®). A multicenter study].

Authors:  J R Rether; J M Muñoz Vives; H J Bail; M H Verhofstad; M Blauth; J Ljungqvist; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study.

Authors:  Michael C Tucker; John R Schwappach; Ross K Leighton; Kevin Coupe; William M Ricci
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Muscle function and functional outcome following standard antegrade reamed intramedullary nailing of isolated femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Nader Helmy; Victor T Jando; Thomas Lu; Holman Chan; Peter J O'Brien
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  A prospective functional outcome and motion analysis evaluation of the hip abductors after femur fracture and antegrade nailing.

Authors:  Michael Archdeacon; Kevin R Ford; John Wyrick; Mark V Paterno; Shelley Hampton; Mary Beth Ludwig; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of internal fixation with Gamma3 Long nails and INTERTAN nails in the treatment of Seinsheimer type V subtrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yan-Hui Li; Dong Zhu; Yuying Li; Tianhao Zhao; Zongbing Cao; Lei Tan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.