Literature DB >> 16137692

Soft tissue injury related to choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing: piriform fossa or greater trochanter tip.

C M Ansari Moein1, M H J Verhofstad, R L A W Bleys, Chr van der Werken.   

Abstract

Intramedullary nailing through the piriform fossa results in some cases in loss of abduction strength and persistent pain. Nail insertion at the tip of the greater trochanter may be favourable. The aim of this study was to assess (possible) iatrogenic injury to the abductor and external rotator musculature, branches of the superior gluteal nerve and branches of the MFCA in relation to the two different entry points. In 10 fresh human cadaver femurs, five unreamed femoral nails (UFN) were inserted through the piriform fossa and five AO prototype nails (AFN) through the trochanteric tip. The iatrogenic injury at each nailing procedure was assessed. Various muscles and tendons, branches of the MFCA along with the hip joint capsule were injured or largely at risk during nail insertion through the piriform fossa. Most of these structures were not exposed during insertion through the trochanteric tip. The reported clinical morbidity after nailing through the piriform fossa may find its origin in direct soft tissue injury and may be reduced by choosing a lateral nail entry point.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16137692     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.07.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

1.  Anatomy of the greater trochanteric 'bald spot': a potential portal for abductor sparing femoral nailing?

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; William J Robertson; Sreevathsa Boraiah; Joseph U Barker; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Robotic technique improves entry point alignment for intramedullary nailing of femur fractures compared to the conventional technique: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Ralf Westphal; Musa Citak; Nael Hawi; Emmanouil Liodakis; Christian Krettek; Timo Stuebig
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-11

3.  Proximal femoral nail - an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year.

Authors:  W M Gadegone; Y S Salphale
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Femoral nailing using a helical nail shape (LFN(®))].

Authors:  J R Rether; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  [Experiences with a helical femoral nail (LFN®). A multicenter study].

Authors:  J R Rether; J M Muñoz Vives; H J Bail; M H Verhofstad; M Blauth; J Ljungqvist; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Intramedullary femoral nailing through the trochanteric fossa versus greater trochanter tip: a randomized controlled study with in-depth functional outcome results.

Authors:  C M Ansari Moein; H J Ten Duis; P L Oey; G A P de Kort; W van der Meulen; Chr van der Werken
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 7.  Management of Subtrochanteric Proximal Femur Fractures: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Christopher Jackson; Mina Tanios; Nabil Ebraheim
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-10-28

8.  Patterns, Management, and Outcome of Traumatic Femur Fracture: Exploring the Experience of the Only Level 1 Trauma Center in Qatar.

Authors:  Syed Imran Ghouri; Mohammad Asim; Fuad Mustafa; Ahad Kanbar; Mohamed Ellabib; Hisham Al Jogol; Mohammed Muneer; Nuri Abdurraheim; Atirek Pratap Goel; Husham Abdelrahman; Hassan Al-Thani; Ayman El-Menyar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.