Literature DB >> 18668630

Soft tissue anatomy around the hip and its implications for choice of entry point in antegrade femoral nailing.

C M Ansari Moein1, M H J Verhofstad, R L A W Bleys, Chr van der Werken.   

Abstract

Antegrade intramedullary nailing is an accepted method of treatment for femoral shaft fractures. Entrance of the nail through the trochanteric fossa is currently recommended by some surgeons. This approach results in some cases, however, in loss of abduction strength and persistent pain. Nail insertion at the tip of the greater trochanter may be more favorable. In this study the anatomical relationships of the trochanteric fossa and of the tip of the greater trochanter were explored. Dissection was carried out in 10 fresh human cadaver femurs. The risks and safety of the two entry points with respect to the adjacent soft tissues were assessed. Abductor muscles and tendons, branches of the medial circumflex femoral artery and the hip joint capsule were at risk during nail insertion through the trochanteric fossa. These structures were not endangered during insertion through the trochanteric tip. The reported clinical morbidity after nailing through the trochanteric fossa may result from direct soft tissue injury and may be reduced by choosing the route through the greater trochanter. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18668630     DOI: 10.1002/ca.20665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  5 in total

1.  Robotic technique improves entry point alignment for intramedullary nailing of femur fractures compared to the conventional technique: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Ralf Westphal; Musa Citak; Nael Hawi; Emmanouil Liodakis; Christian Krettek; Timo Stuebig
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-11

2.  [Femoral nailing using a helical nail shape (LFN(®))].

Authors:  J R Rether; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  [Experiences with a helical femoral nail (LFN®). A multicenter study].

Authors:  J R Rether; J M Muñoz Vives; H J Bail; M H Verhofstad; M Blauth; J Ljungqvist; D Höntzsch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Intramedullary femoral nailing through the trochanteric fossa versus greater trochanter tip: a randomized controlled study with in-depth functional outcome results.

Authors:  C M Ansari Moein; H J Ten Duis; P L Oey; G A P de Kort; W van der Meulen; Chr van der Werken
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Antegrade versus retrograde nailing techniques and trochanteric versus piriformis intramedullary nailing entry points for femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nasir Hussain; Farrah Naz Hussain; Corey Sermer; Hera Kamdar; Emil H Schemitsch; Amir Sternheim; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.