Literature DB >> 25117089

Interactions between voluntary and involuntary attention modulate the quality and temporal dynamics of visual processing.

Michael A Grubb1, Alex L White, David J Heeger, Marisa Carrasco.   

Abstract

Successfully navigating a dynamic environment requires the efficient distribution of finite neural resources. Voluntary (endogenous) covert spatial attention selectively allocates those processing resources to goal-relevant locations in the visual scene in the absence of eye movements. However, the allocation of spatial attention is not always voluntary; abrupt onsets in the visual periphery automatically enhance processing of nearby stimuli (exogenous attention). In dynamic environments, exogenous events and internal goals likely compete to determine the distribution of attention, but how such competition is resolved is not well understood. To investigate how exogenous events interact with the concurrent allocation of voluntary attention, we used a speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) procedure. SAT conjointly measures the rate of information accrual and asymptotic discriminability, allowing us to measure how attentional interactions unfold over time during stimulus processing. We found that both types of attention sped information accrual and improved discriminability. However, focusing endogenous attention at the target location reduced the effects of exogenous cues on the rate of information accrual and rendered negligible their effects on asymptotic discriminability. We verified the robustness of these findings in four additional experiments that targeted specific, critical response delays. In conclusion, the speed and quality of visual processing depend conjointly on internally and externally driven attentional states, but it is possible to voluntarily diminish distraction by irrelevant events in the periphery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25117089      PMCID: PMC4326639          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0698-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  32 in total

1.  Speed of visual processing increases with eccentricity.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Brian McElree; Kristina Denisova; Anna Marie Giordano
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Competition between endogenous and exogenous orienting of visual attention.

Authors:  Andrea Berger; Avishai Henik; Robert Rafal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-05

4.  When sustained attention impairs perception.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing.

Authors:  Joseph B Hopfinger; Vicki M West
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Figure-ground segmentation can occur without attention.

Authors:  Ruth Kimchi; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-07

7.  Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory.

Authors:  A V Reed
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention.

Authors:  Ana B Chica; Paolo Bartolomeo; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Exogenous attention enhances 2nd-order contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Michael S Landy; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Suppressive interactions underlying visually evoked fixational saccades.

Authors:  Helena X Wang; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; David J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The Role of Object Individuation in Attention and Visual Processing.

Authors:  Bridgitt Shea
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Evidence for unlimited capacity processing of simple features in visual cortex.

Authors:  Alex L White; Erik Runeson; John Palmer; Zachary R Ernst; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  An image-computable model of how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set.

Authors:  Jaap Munneke; Sylco S Hoppenbrouwers; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Alex L White; Wanghaoming Fang; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.