Literature DB >> 25645962

Suppressive interactions underlying visually evoked fixational saccades.

Helena X Wang1, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg2, David J Heeger3.   

Abstract

Small saccades occur frequently during fixation, and are coupled to changes in visual stimulation and cognitive state. Neurophysiologically, fixational saccades reflect neural activity near the foveal region of a continuous visuomotor map. It is well known that competitive interactions between neurons within visuomotor maps contribute to target selection for large saccades. Here we asked how such interactions in visuomotor maps shape the rate and direction of small fixational saccades. We measured fixational saccades during periods of prolonged fixation while presenting pairs of visual stimuli (parafoveal: 0.8° eccentricity; peripheral: 5° eccentricity) of various contrasts. Fixational saccade direction was biased toward locations of parafoveal stimuli but not peripheral stimuli, ∼100-250ms following stimulus onset. The rate of fixational saccades toward parafoveal stimuli (congruent saccades) increased systematically with parafoveal stimulus contrast, and was suppressed by the simultaneous presentation of a peripheral stimulus. The suppression was best characterized as a combination of two processes: a subtractive suppression of the overall fixational saccade rate and a divisive suppression of the direction bias. These results reveal the nature of suppressive interactions within visuomotor maps and constrain models of the population code for fixational saccades.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fixational eye movements; Microsaccades; Superior colliculus; Suppression; Visual attention; Visuomotor maps

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25645962      PMCID: PMC4520795          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  84 in total

1.  Microsaccades keep the eyes' balance during fixation.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-06

2.  Spatial interactions in the superior colliculus predict saccade behavior in a neural field model.

Authors:  Robert A Marino; Thomas P Trappenberg; Michael Dorris; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Triggering mechanisms in microsaccade and saccade generation: a novel proposal.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Stephen L Macknik; Alessandro Serra; R John Leigh; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Rare but precious: microsaccades are highly informative about attentional allocation.

Authors:  Alexander Pastukhov; Jochen Braun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  When do microsaccades follow spatial attention?

Authors:  Jochen Laubrock; Reinhold Kliegl; Martin Rolfs; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Miniature eye movements enhance fine spatial detail.

Authors:  Michele Rucci; Ramon Iovin; Martina Poletti; Fabrizio Santini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability.

Authors:  M A Basso; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  An oculomotor continuum from exploration to fixation.

Authors:  Jorge Otero-Millan; Stephen L Macknik; Rachel E Langston; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge.

Authors:  D P Munoz; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Size and distribution of movement fields in the monkey superior colliculus.

Authors:  D L Sparks; R Holland; B L Guthrie
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-20       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fixational eye movements predict visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Chris Scholes; Paul V McGraw; Marcus Nyström; Neil W Roach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Saccadic latency in amblyopia.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Dennis M Levi; Clifton M Schor; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.