BACKGROUND: Preventing and managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain important goals. The objective of the Pan Australasian chemotherapy-induced emesis burden of illness (PrACTICE) study was to describe the incidence of CINV after highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer in current clinical practice in Australia and five Asian countries (China, India, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan). STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, observational study of CINV was conducted at 31 sites in these six countries from August 2011 through September 2012 and enrolled male and female adult patients (≥18 years of age) naïve to HEC and MEC who were scheduled to receive at least two cycles of single-day chemotherapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was complete response, defined as no vomiting or use of rescue therapy, during chemotherapy cycle 1 in the overall phase (0-120 h), acute phase (0-24 h), and delayed phase (>24-120 h). Study outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Primary outcomes, CINV incidence, and treatment patterns (chemotherapy, CINV prophylaxis, rescue medication prescription, and rescue medication use) were assessed by phase (overall, acute, delayed), by cycle (as appropriate), within and across countries, and by level of chemotherapy emetogenicity (HEC vs. MEC). The impact of CINV in cycle 1 on CINV in cycle 2 was analyzed for all patients with evaluable data for cycle 2. No site-specific analyses were performed. The remainder of this special series of papers reports on the results of this study.
BACKGROUND: Preventing and managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain important goals. The objective of the Pan Australasian chemotherapy-induced emesis burden of illness (PrACTICE) study was to describe the incidence of CINV after highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer in current clinical practice in Australia and five Asian countries (China, India, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan). STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, observational study of CINV was conducted at 31 sites in these six countries from August 2011 through September 2012 and enrolled male and female adult patients (≥18 years of age) naïve to HEC and MEC who were scheduled to receive at least two cycles of single-day chemotherapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was complete response, defined as no vomiting or use of rescue therapy, during chemotherapy cycle 1 in the overall phase (0-120 h), acute phase (0-24 h), and delayed phase (>24-120 h). Study outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Primary outcomes, CINV incidence, and treatment patterns (chemotherapy, CINV prophylaxis, rescue medication prescription, and rescue medication use) were assessed by phase (overall, acute, delayed), by cycle (as appropriate), within and across countries, and by level of chemotherapy emetogenicity (HEC vs. MEC). The impact of CINV in cycle 1 on CINV in cycle 2 was analyzed for all patients with evaluable data for cycle 2. No site-specific analyses were performed. The remainder of this special series of papers reports on the results of this study.
Authors: Ethan Basch; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Paul J Hesketh; Mark G Kris; Petra C Feyer; Mark R Somerfield; Maurice Chesney; Rebecca Anne Clark-Snow; Anne Marie Flaherty; Barbara Freundlich; Gary Morrow; Kamakshi V Rao; Rowena N Schwartz; Gary H Lyman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hoon-Kyo Kim; RueyKuen Hsieh; Alexandre Chan; Shiying Yu; Baohui Han; Yunong Gao; Ana Baños; Xiaoyan Ying; Thomas A Burke; Dorothy M K Keefe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Dyah Aryani Perwitasari; Jarir Atthobari; Mustofa Mustofa; Iwan Dwiprahasto; Mohammad Hakimi; Hans Gelderblom; Hein Putter; Johan W R Nortier; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Ad A Kaptein Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: A Molassiotis; M P Saunders; J Valle; G Wilson; P Lorigan; A Wardley; E Levine; R Cowan; J Loncaster; C Rittenberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alexander Molassiotis; Peter A Coventry; Carrie T Stricker; Caroline Clements; Beth Eaby; Luke Velders; Cynthia Rittenberg; Richard J Gralla Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2007-05-23 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Ruey Kuen Hsieh; Alexandre Chan; Hoon-Kyo Kim; Shiying Yu; Jong Gwang Kim; Myung-Ah Lee; Johan Dalén; Hun Jung; Yan Ping Liu; Thomas A Burke; Dorothy M K Keefe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Hoon-Kyo Kim; RueyKuen Hsieh; Alexandre Chan; Shiying Yu; Baohui Han; Yunong Gao; Ana Baños; Xiaoyan Ying; Thomas A Burke; Dorothy M K Keefe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alexandre Chan; Hoon-Kyo Kim; Ruey Kuen Hsieh; Shiying Yu; Gilberto de Lima Lopes; Wu-Chou Su; Ana Baños; Sandeep Bhatia; Thomas A Burke; Dorothy M K Keefe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Shiying Yu; Thomas A Burke; Alexandre Chan; Hoon-Kyo Kim; Ruey Kuen Hsieh; Xichun Hu; Jin-Tung Liang; Ana Baños; Carmel Spiteri; Dorothy M K Keefe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Alexandre Chan; Matin M Abdullah; Wan Zamaniah B Wan Ishak; Annielyn B Ong-Cornel; Antonio H Villalon; Ravindran Kanesvaran Journal: J Glob Oncol Date: 2016-11-09