Literature DB >> 25113097

Muscle activation during low- versus high-load resistance training in well-trained men.

Brad J Schoenfeld1, Bret Contreras, Jeffrey M Willardson, Fabio Fontana, Gul Tiryaki-Sonmez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It has been hypothesized that lifting light loads to muscular failure will activate the full spectrum of MUs and thus bring about muscular adaptations similar to high-load training. The purpose of this study was to investigate EMG activity during low- versus high-load training during performance of a multi-joint exercise by well-trained subjects.
METHODS: Employing a within-subject design, 10 young, resistance-trained men performed sets of the leg press at different intensities of load: a high-load (HL) set at 75% of 1-RM and a low-load (LL) set at 30% of 1-RM. The order of performance of the exercises was counterbalanced between participants, so that half of the subjects performed LL first and the other half performed HL first, separated by 15 min rest. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to assess mean and peak muscle activation of the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and biceps femoris.
RESULTS: Significant main effects for trials and muscles were found (p < 0.01). Significantly greater peak EMG activity was found during the HL set (M = 177.3, SD = 89.53) compared to the LL set (M = 137.73, SD = 95.35). Significantly greater mean EMG activity was found during the HL set (M = 63.7, SD = 37.23) compared to the LL set (M = 41.63, SD = 28.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that training with a load of 30% 1-RM to momentary muscular failure does not maximally activate the full motor unit pool of the quadriceps femoris and hamstrings during performance of multi-joint lower body exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25113097     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2976-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  22 in total

Review 1.  Bigger weights may not beget bigger muscles: evidence from acute muscle protein synthetic responses after resistance exercise.

Authors:  Nicholas A Burd; Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.665

2.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 3.  Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Ales Holobar; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Effects of low-intensity resistance exercise with slow movement and tonic force generation on muscular function in young men.

Authors:  Michiya Tanimoto; Naokata Ishii
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-12-08

Review 5.  Training adaptations in the behavior of human motor units.

Authors:  Jacques Duchateau; John G Semmler; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-06-22

Review 6.  The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Characterization and regulation of mechanical loading-induced compensatory muscle hypertrophy.

Authors:  Gregory R Adams; Marcas M Bamman
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 9.090

8.  Resistance exercise biology: manipulation of resistance exercise programme variables determines the responses of cellular and molecular signalling pathways.

Authors:  Barry A Spiering; William J Kraemer; Jeffrey M Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; Bradley C Nindl; Jeff S Volek; Carl M Maresh
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones.

Authors:  Gerson E R Campos; Thomas J Luecke; Heather K Wendeln; Kumika Toma; Fredrick C Hagerman; Thomas F Murray; Kerry E Ragg; Nicholas A Ratamess; William J Kraemer; Robert S Staron
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 10.  Signaling in muscle atrophy and hypertrophy.

Authors:  Marco Sandri
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2008-06
View more
  17 in total

1.  Muscle activation during three sets to failure at 80 vs. 30% 1RM resistance exercise.

Authors:  Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Terry J Housh; Haley C Bergstrom; Kristen C Cochrane; Ethan C Hill; Cory M Smith; Glen O Johnson; Richard J Schmidt; Joel T Cramer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Unique activation of the quadriceps femoris during single- and multi-joint exercises.

Authors:  Ryoichi Ema; Masanori Sakaguchi; Ryota Akagi; Yasuo Kawakami
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  High- and Low-Load Resistance Training: Interpretation and Practical Application of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  James Fisher; James Steele; Dave Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Crescent pyramid and drop-set systems do not promote greater strength gains, muscle hypertrophy, and changes on muscle architecture compared with traditional resistance training in well-trained men.

Authors:  Vitor Angleri; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Cleiton Augusto Libardi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Longing for a Longitudinal Proxy: Acutely Measured Surface EMG Amplitude is not a Validated Predictor of Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Andrew D Vigotsky; Israel Halperin; Gabriel S Trajano; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Fatigability of the knee extensors following high- and low-load resistance exercise sessions in trained men.

Authors:  Paul W Marshall; Thomas Forward; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  A Review of the Acute Effects and Long-Term Adaptations of Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises during Resistance Training.

Authors:  Paulo Gentil; James Fisher; James Steele
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Effect of Training Leading to Repetition Failure on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tim Davies; Rhonda Orr; Mark Halaki; Daniel Hackett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Influence of Feet Position and Execution Velocity on Muscle Activation and Kinematic Parameters During the Inclined Leg Press Exercise.

Authors:  Isabel Martín-Fuentes; José M Oliva-Lozano; José M Muyor
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.355

10.  Is Resistance Training to Muscular Failure Necessary?

Authors:  Sanmy R Nóbrega; Cleiton A Libardi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.