Literature DB >> 12436270

Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones.

Gerson E R Campos1, Thomas J Luecke, Heather K Wendeln, Kumika Toma, Fredrick C Hagerman, Thomas F Murray, Kerry E Ragg, Nicholas A Ratamess, William J Kraemer, Robert S Staron.   

Abstract

Thirty-two untrained men [mean (SD) age 22.5 (5.8) years, height 178.3 (7.2) cm, body mass 77.8 (11.9) kg] participated in an 8-week progressive resistance-training program to investigate the "strength-endurance continuum". Subjects were divided into four groups: a low repetition group (Low Rep, n = 9) performing 3-5 repetitions maximum (RM) for four sets of each exercise with 3 min rest between sets and exercises, an intermediate repetition group (Int Rep, n = 11) performing 9-11 RM for three sets with 2 min rest, a high repetition group (High Rep, n = 7) performing 20-28 RM for two sets with 1 min rest, and a non-exercising control group (Con, n = 5). Three exercises (leg press, squat, and knee extension) were performed 2 days/week for the first 4 weeks and 3 days/week for the final 4 weeks. Maximal strength [one repetition maximum, 1RM), local muscular endurance (maximal number of repetitions performed with 60% of 1RM), and various cardiorespiratory parameters (e.g., maximum oxygen consumption, pulmonary ventilation, maximal aerobic power, time to exhaustion) were assessed at the beginning and end of the study. In addition, pre- and post-training muscle biopsy samples were analyzed for fiber-type composition, cross-sectional area, myosin heavy chain (MHC) content, and capillarization. Maximal strength improved significantly more for the Low Rep group compared to the other training groups, and the maximal number of repetitions at 60% 1RM improved the most for the High Rep group. In addition, maximal aerobic power and time to exhaustion significantly increased at the end of the study for only the High Rep group. All three major fiber types (types I, IIA, and IIB) hypertrophied for the Low Rep and Int Rep groups, whereas no significant increases were demonstrated for either the High Rep or Con groups. However, the percentage of type IIB fibers decreased, with a concomitant increase in IIAB fibers for all three resistance-trained groups. These fiber-type conversions were supported by a significant decrease in MHCIIb accompanied by a significant increase in MHCIIa. No significant changes in fiber-type composition were found in the control samples. Although all three training regimens resulted in similar fiber-type transformations (IIB to IIA), the low to intermediate repetition resistance-training programs induced a greater hypertrophic effect compared to the high repetition regimen. The High Rep group, however, appeared better adapted for submaximal, prolonged contractions, with significant increases after training in aerobic power and time to exhaustion. Thus, low and intermediate RM training appears to induce similar muscular adaptations, at least after short-term training in previously untrained subjects. Overall, however, these data demonstrate that both physical performance and the associated physiological adaptations are linked to the intensity and number of repetitions performed, and thus lend support to the "strength-endurance continuum".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12436270     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0681-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  195 in total

1.  Diffusive sensitivity to muscle architecture: a magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging study of the human calf.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Stefan Maderwald; Kai Uffmann; Armin de Greiff; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-04-19

3.  SUSTAINED ISOMETRIC SHOULDER CONTRACTION ON MUSCULAR STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL.

Authors:  Natalie L Myers; Jenny L Toonstra; Jacob S Smith; Cooper A Padgett; Tim L Uhl
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Intramuscular Anabolic Signaling and Endocrine Response Following Resistance Exercise: Implications for Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Adam M Gonzalez; Jay R Hoffman; Jeffrey R Stout; David H Fukuda; Darryn S Willoughby
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The Importance of Muscular Strength in Athletic Performance.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness: a review of the acute programme variables.

Authors:  Stephen P Bird; Kyle M Tarpenning; Frank E Marino
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Reactivity, stability, and strength performance capacity in motor sports.

Authors:  H Baur; S Müller; A Hirschmüller; G Huber; F Mayer
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Medium-intensity, high-volume "hypertrophic" resistance training did not induce improvements in rapid force production in healthy older men.

Authors:  Simon Walker; Heikki Peltonen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-04-25

9.  Cycle training increased GLUT4 and activation of mammalian target of rapamycin in fast twitch muscle fibers.

Authors:  Charles A Stuart; Mary E A Howell; Jonathan D Baker; Rhesa J Dykes; Michelle M Duffourc; Michael W Ramsey; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 10.  The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations.

Authors:  Andrew C Fry
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.