| Literature DB >> 25112831 |
B J Schwaiger1, F Kober2, A S Gersing2, J F Kleine2, S Wunderlich3, C Zimmer2, H Poppert3, S Prothmann2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of the pREset device, a stent retriever system, for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion.Entities:
Keywords: MCA occlusion; Mechanical thrombectomy; Stent retriever; Stroke; Vessel anatomy; pREset
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25112831 PMCID: PMC4833806 DOI: 10.1007/s00062-014-0329-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Neuroradiol ISSN: 1869-1439 Impact factor: 3.649
Fig. 1The pREset 4/20 in clinical use. The image shows the fully expanded device with its closed-cell structure connected to a proximal closed ring (asterisk), which eccentrically merges into the pusher wire (right arrow). At this connection point, there is one radiopaque marker, while there are two more at the distal end of the working length (left arrow). Note the thrombotic material retrieved out of the M1 segment of a 56-year-old female patient, whose final angiogram was graded TICI 3 after two passages
Fig. 2Baseline (a) and final (b) angiograms of the right internal carotid artery and the right MCA of a 73-year-old male patient. The angle between the proximal, nearly horizontal part and the more distal part of the M1 segment after the curvature measures 104.6°. After four futile passages with pREset and Solitaire stent retrievers, the procedure was discontinued and the final angiogram was graded as TICI 0
Epidemiological, clinical, and technical parameters as well as outcome of all patients and comparison between subgroups depending on recanalization success
| Parameter | All patients | TICI 0–2a | TICI 2b/3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group/subgroup size | 48 | 9 (18.7 %) | 39 (81.3 %) | |
| Female sex ( | 24 (50 %) | 3 (33.3 %) | 21 (53.8 %) | 0.461 |
| Age (years; mean ± SD) | 71.0 ± 11.9 | 66.4 ± 10.4 | 72.1 ± 12.1 | 0.203 |
| Wake-up ( | 3 (6.3 %) | 0 (0.0 %) | 3 (7.7 %) | 1,000 |
| Time from symptom onset to puncture (min; mean ± SD)a | 246 ± 88.0 | 229 ± 124.1 | 249 ± 81.1 | 0.573 |
| Procedure time (min; mean ± SD)b | 54 ± 35.6 | 67 ± 42.2 | 51 ± 34.3 | 0.276 |
| Time from onset to recanalization (min; mean ± SD)a | 299 ± 94.9 | 296 ± 139.3 | 300 ± 86.5 | 0.920 |
| IV rTPA administered ( | 34 (65.4 %) | 4 (44.4 %) | 30 (76.9 %) | 0.099 |
| Passages of device ( | 2 (1 to 8) | 4 (1 to 8) | 2 (1 to 6) |
|
| More than one device used ( | 16 (33.3 %) | 6 (66.7 %) | 10 (25.6 %) |
|
| Curved MCA ( | 5 (10.4 %) | 4 (44.4 %) | 1 (2.6 %) |
|
| NIHSS score at admission (median, range) | 15 (2 to 27) | 15 (9 to 24) | 15 (2 to 27) | 0.912 |
| NIHSS score at discharge (median, range)c | 7 (0 to 43) | 11 (3 to 43) | 5 (0 to 43) |
|
| NIHSS improvement (median, range)c | − 7 (− 20 to 34) | 0 (− 8 to 34) | − 7 (− 20 to 30) | 0.094 |
| NIHSS improvement more than four points ( | 34 (72.3 %) | 4 (44.4 %) | 30 (76.9 %) | 0.191 |
| mRS score 0–2 at dischargeb | 17 (37.0 %) | 0 (0 %) | 17 (45.9 %) |
|
| mRS score 0–2 at follow-upa | 18 (41.9 %) | 1 (12.5 %) | 17 (48.6 %) | 0.111 |
| Death within 90 days ( | 8 (18.6 %) | 5 (62.5 %) | 3 (8.6 %) |
|
Data missing for n patients (a n = 5; b n = 2; c n = 1)
*Significant on the level P < 0.05
Fig. 3Shift analyses showing mRS values at discharge and follow-up of patients after successful (TICI 2b/3) versus unsuccessful (TICI 0–2a) recanalization. After successful recanalization, significantly more patients presented a favorable outcome (mRS score 0–2) at discharge (asterisk, P < 0.05). At follow-up, however, this distinct trend was not statistically significant