Literature DB >> 25111587

Clinical experience and follow-up with large scale single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy testing.

Pe'er Dar1, Kirsten J Curnow2, Susan J Gross2, Megan P Hall2, Melissa Stosic2, Zachary Demko2, Bernhard Zimmermann2, Matthew Hill2, Styrmir Sigurjonsson2, Allison Ryan2, Milena Banjevic2, Paula L Kolacki3, Susan W Koch3, Charles M Strom3, Matthew Rabinowitz2, Peter Benn4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to report on laboratory and clinical experience following 6 months of clinical implementation of a single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy test in high- and low-risk women. STUDY
DESIGN: All samples received from March through September 2013 and drawn ≥9 weeks' gestation were included. Samples that passed quality control were analyzed for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and monosomy X. Results were reported as high or low risk for fetal aneuploidy for each interrogated chromosome. Relationships between fetal fraction and gestational age and maternal weight were analyzed. Follow-up on outcome was sought for a subset of high-risk cases. False-negative results were reported voluntarily by providers. Positive predictive value (PPV) was calculated from cases with an available prenatal or postnatal karyotype or clinical evaluation at birth.
RESULTS: Samples were received from 31,030 patients, 30,705 met study criteria, and 28,739 passed quality-control metrics and received a report detailing aneuploidy risk. Fetal fraction correlated positively with gestational age, and negatively with maternal weight. In all, 507 patients received a high-risk result for any of the 4 tested conditions (324 trisomy 21, 82 trisomy 18, 41 trisomy 13, 61 monosomy X; including 1 double aneuploidy case). Within the 17,885 cases included in follow-up analysis, 356 were high risk, and outcome information revealed 184 (51.7%) true positives, 38 (10.7%) false positives, 19 (5.3%) with ultrasound findings suggestive of aneuploidy, 36 (10.1%) spontaneous abortions without karyotype confirmation, 22 (6.2%) terminations without karyotype confirmation, and 57 (16.0%) lost to follow-up. This yielded an 82.9% PPV for all aneuploidies, and a 90.9% PPV for trisomy 21. The overall PPV for women aged ≥35 years was similar to the PPV for women aged <35 years. Two patients were reported as false negatives.
CONCLUSION: The data from this large-scale report on clinical application of a commercially available noninvasive prenatal test suggest that the clinical performance of this single-nucleotide polymorphism-based noninvasive prenatal test in a mixed high- and low-risk population is consistent with performance in validation studies.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low-risk; noninvasive prenatal testing; single-nucleotide polymorphism; trisomy 21

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25111587     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  56 in total

1.  Pregnancy: Prepare for unexpected prenatal test results.

Authors:  Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Repeated failed non-invasive prenatal testing in a woman with immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid syndrome: lessons learnt.

Authors:  C Y Y Hui; W C Tan; E L Tan; L K Tan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-05

3.  The IONA® Test: Development of an Automated Cell-Free DNA-Based Screening Test for Fetal Trisomies 13, 18, and 21 That Employs the Ion Proton Semiconductor Sequencing Platform.

Authors:  Francesco Crea; Matthew Forman; Rachel Hulme; Robert W Old; Dan Ryan; Rosalyn Mazey; Michael D Risley
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.587

4.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome abnormalities: a source of confusion.

Authors:  Erkan Kalafat; Mehmet Murat Seval; Batuhan Turgay; Acar Koç
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  Impact of the increased adoption of prenatal cfDNA screening on non-profit patient advocacy organizations in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Meredith; Christopher Kaposy; Victoria J Miller; Megan Allyse; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Non-invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Better Meet an Expert!: The Case of a Late Detected Trisomy 13 Reveals Structural Problems in NIPT Counselling and Highlights Substantial Risks for the Reproductive Autonomy.

Authors:  T Ohnhaeuser; D Schmitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

8.  Most noninvasive prenatal screens failing due to inadequate fetal cell free DNA are negative for trisomy when repeated.

Authors:  Jaime L Lopes; Guilherme S Lopes; Elizabeth A L Enninga; Hutton M Kearney; Nicole L Hoppman; Ross A Rowsey
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  The Integration of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening into the Existing Prenatal Paradigm: a Survey of Current Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Emily Suskin; Laura Hercher; Kathleen Erskine Aaron; Komal Bajaj
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.