Sarah Lancaster1, Geoff Smith2, Oluwafunto Ogunleye2, Iain Packham2. 1. Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. slancaster@doctors.org.uk. 2. Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pathology of the biceps tendon can contribute to significant shoulder pain and dysfunction for which biceps tenodesis may be indicated. A variety of techniques tenodesing the biceps tendon have been described. Recently, tenodesis using a uni- or bicortical button has been advocated. This cadaveric study investigates the proximity of the axillary nerve to the position of bicortical drill passages during biceps tenodesis. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulder specimens were used. The axillary nerve was marked during a preparatory dissection using wire. Drills were passed through the humerus at the proximal and distal ends of the bicipital groove, and at the superior insertion point of pectoralis major (PM). These were left in situ. The distances between these drills and the axillary nerves were measured using computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: The drill bits placed at the superior insertion of PM were in closest proximity to the axillary nerve (3D distance mean 10.7 mm, 95 % confidence interval 7.2-14.2 mm). A drill placed at the distal end of the bicipital groove was a mean distance of 18.2 mm from the nerve. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for caution when drilling the posterior humeral cortex during biceps tenodesis, particularly during drilling at the superior insertion of PM as this is the location that poses the highest risk to the axillary nerve. To our knowledge, this is the first cadaveric study to radiologically assess the proximity of the axillary nerve to the positions of biceps tenodesis. Surgeons should therefore be cautious when performing bicortical drilling for biceps tenodesis, and a supero-lateral drill trajectory would pose a smaller risk to the axillary nerve.
PURPOSE: Pathology of the biceps tendon can contribute to significant shoulder pain and dysfunction for which biceps tenodesis may be indicated. A variety of techniques tenodesing the biceps tendon have been described. Recently, tenodesis using a uni- or bicortical button has been advocated. This cadaveric study investigates the proximity of the axillary nerve to the position of bicortical drill passages during biceps tenodesis. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulder specimens were used. The axillary nerve was marked during a preparatory dissection using wire. Drills were passed through the humerus at the proximal and distal ends of the bicipital groove, and at the superior insertion point of pectoralis major (PM). These were left in situ. The distances between these drills and the axillary nerves were measured using computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: The drill bits placed at the superior insertion of PM were in closest proximity to the axillary nerve (3D distance mean 10.7 mm, 95 % confidence interval 7.2-14.2 mm). A drill placed at the distal end of the bicipital groove was a mean distance of 18.2 mm from the nerve. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for caution when drilling the posterior humeral cortex during biceps tenodesis, particularly during drilling at the superior insertion of PM as this is the location that poses the highest risk to the axillary nerve. To our knowledge, this is the first cadaveric study to radiologically assess the proximity of the axillary nerve to the positions of biceps tenodesis. Surgeons should therefore be cautious when performing bicortical drilling for biceps tenodesis, and a supero-lateral drill trajectory would pose a smaller risk to the axillary nerve.
Authors: Paul M Sethi; Arun Rajaram; Knut Beitzel; Thomas R Hackett; David M Chowaniec; Augustus D Mazzocca Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Augustus D Mazzocca; James Bicos; Stephen Santangelo; Anthony A Romeo; Robert A Arciero Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Shane J Nho; Stefanie N Reiff; Nikhil N Verma; Mark A Slabaugh; Augustus D Mazzocca; Anthony A Romeo Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Arne Buchholz; Frank Martetschläger; Sebastian Siebenlist; Gunther H Sandmann; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Andreas Lenich; Peter J Millett; Ulrich Stöckle; Florian Elser Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Andrew R Hsu; Neil S Ghodadra; Matthew T Provencher; Paul B Lewis; Bernard R Bach Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Pascal Boileau; François Baqué; Laure Valerio; Philip Ahrens; Christopher Chuinard; Christophe Trojani Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Adnan Saithna; Alison Longo; R W Jordan; Jeff Leiter; Peter MacDonald; Jason Old Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 4.342