Literature DB >> 28808728

[Subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon with an interference screw and a cortical button : Clinical and cosmetic results after 1 year].

P-C Nolte1, N Pister2, F Holz2, M Egenolf2, T Chatterjee2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathologies of the long head of biceps tendon (LHB) can cause anterior shoulder pain. Surgical treatment includes tenotomy and tenodesis (TD), however TD causes fewer cosmetic deformities and less cramping of the biceps muscle. To date, numerous techniques for TD have been described but the "gold standard" has not yet been established.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the functional and cosmetic outcome following subpectoral biceps TD with an interference screw and a cortical-button (STLHB-IC) after 1 year.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 35 patients (10 female, 25 male) with an average age of 57.4 ± 7 years were examined after STLHB-IC with a follow up of 12.8 ± 1.2 months. The constant score (CS), the long head of biceps score (LHBS) and the subjective shoulder value (SSV) were assessed. Furthermore, the cosmetic result was evaluated by the patient and the examiner, and the elbow flexion strength (EFS) was measured.
RESULTS: The CS (82.5 ± 17.2), LHBS (90.1 ± 11.5) and SSV (83.2 ± 17.7) showed good and excellent results. The SSV increased significantly pre vs. postoperatively (40.6 ± 19.7 vs. 83.2 ± 17.7). The CS (82.5 ± 17.2) and the LHBS (90.1 ± 11.5), as well as the EFS (17.5 ± 4.8 kg) of the affected shoulder revealed no significant differences compared with the non-affected shoulder (CS: 91.8 ± 11.3, LHBS: 99.1 ± 11.5; EFS: 19.7 ± 4.8). Severe Popeye deformities (measured by LHBS) were found in 6% of the cases, however if they occurred patients (13.4 ± 3.8) evaluated them as significantly less disadvantageous than the examiners (11.9 ± 4.7). There were no neurovascular injuries, infections or fractures.
CONCLUSION: STLHB-IC is a safe, reproducible technique with convincing functional and cosmetic results that provides high patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient satisfaction; Popeye deformity; Shoulder pain; Tendons, para-articular; Upper arm

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28808728     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3458-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  25 in total

1.  Biomechanical performance of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of interference screw fixation, cortical button fixation, and interference screw diameter.

Authors:  Paul M Sethi; Arun Rajaram; Knut Beitzel; Thomas R Hackett; David M Chowaniec; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  [Suprapectoral mini-open biceps tenodesis - functional and sonographic results].

Authors:  J C Katthagen; P Grimmas; G Jensen; C Voigt; H Lill
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 0.923

3.  Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.

Authors:  Thilo Patzer; Gerwin Santo; Gavin D Olender; Mathias Wellmann; Christof Hurschler; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Navin Gurnani; Derek F P van Deurzen; Vincent T Janmaat; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Arthroscopic tenodesis or tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon in preselected patients : Does it make a difference?]

Authors:  M Kerschbaum; N Maziak; M Scheuermann; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Sumant G Krishnan; Jean-Sebastien Coste; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Matthew L Lyons; Cody L Evans; Justin W Griffin; Joseph M Hart; Mark D Miller; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Torsional Fracture of the Humerus after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  David P Beason; Jay P Shah; James W Duckett; Patrick W Jost; Glenn S Fleisig; E Lyle Cain
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.063

9.  Arthroscopic knotless suprapectoral tenodesis of the long head of biceps: clinical and structural results.

Authors:  Maximilian Kerschbaum; Mitja Scheuermann; Christian Gerhardt; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of minimum 2-year clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Cody L Evans; Russel E Holzgrefe; Jeffrey M Tuman; Joseph M Hart; Eric W Carson; David R Diduch; Mark D Miller; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  Arthroscopic On-Lay Biceps Tenodesis: The Loop-Lock Technique.

Authors:  Matthew Daggett; Blake Stepanovich; Andrew Meyers; Brian Geraghty
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-09-10

2.  Improvement in long head of biceps function and lower rate of biceps deformities after subpectoral tenodesis with cortical button and interference screw vs. arthroscopic tenotomy: a 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Filipe Ferreira Carvalho; Philip-Christian Nolte; Joao Pinheiro; Thorsten Guehring; Michael Egenolf; Thomas Chatterjee
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-06-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.