Binh T Nguyen1, Kerem Shuval2, Valentine Y Njike3, David L Katz3. 1. Intramural Research Department, Economic and Health Policy Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: binh.nguyen@cancer.org. 2. Intramural Research Department, Economic and Health Policy Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA. 3. Yale University Prevention Research Center, Griffin Hospital, Derby, CT.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and diet quality among low-income adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined US nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2003-2004, 2005-2006, 2007-2008, and 2009-2010. The data were analyzed from October 7, 2013, to March 1, 2014. The analytic sample consisted of 4211 low-income adults aged 20 to 64 years, of whom 1830 participate in SNAP. We adhered to the National Cancer Institute method in calculating the Healthy Eating Index 2010 and other dietary indicators, such as empty calorie intake. Bivariate and multivariable regression was used to compare SNAP participants and income-eligible nonparticipants among the full sample and subsamples of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and food insecurity. RESULTS: Compared with low-income nonparticipants, adjusted analyses reveal that SNAP participants had lower dietary quality scores overall (42.58 vs 44.36, P≤.0001) and lower scores for fruits and vegetables, seafood and plant proteins (1.55 vs 1.77, P≤.0022), and empty calories (9.03 vs 9.90, P≤.0001), but they exhibited comparable scores on whole grain, refined grain, total dairy, total protein, fatty acid, and sodium intakes. The association between SNAP participation and lower dietary quality was statistically significant among women, Hispanics, young adults, and individuals who were food secure. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that SNAP participants have lower dietary quality than their income-eligible nonparticipant counterparts. Although SNAP has an important role in providing nutrition assistance to eligible low-income individuals, interventions are warranted to improve the dietary quality of participants.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and diet quality among low-income adults. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined US nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2003-2004, 2005-2006, 2007-2008, and 2009-2010. The data were analyzed from October 7, 2013, to March 1, 2014. The analytic sample consisted of 4211 low-income adults aged 20 to 64 years, of whom 1830 participate in SNAP. We adhered to the National Cancer Institute method in calculating the Healthy Eating Index 2010 and other dietary indicators, such as empty calorie intake. Bivariate and multivariable regression was used to compare SNAP participants and income-eligible nonparticipants among the full sample and subsamples of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and food insecurity. RESULTS: Compared with low-income nonparticipants, adjusted analyses reveal that SNAP participants had lower dietary quality scores overall (42.58 vs 44.36, P≤.0001) and lower scores for fruits and vegetables, seafood and plant proteins (1.55 vs 1.77, P≤.0022), and empty calories (9.03 vs 9.90, P≤.0001), but they exhibited comparable scores on whole grain, refined grain, total dairy, total protein, fatty acid, and sodium intakes. The association between SNAP participation and lower dietary quality was statistically significant among women, Hispanics, young adults, and individuals who were food secure. CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest that SNAP participants have lower dietary quality than their income-eligible nonparticipant counterparts. Although SNAP has an important role in providing nutrition assistance to eligible low-income individuals, interventions are warranted to improve the dietary quality of participants.
Authors: Rebecca L Rivera; Yumin Zhang; Qi Wang; Melissa K Maulding; Janet A Tooze; Breanne N Wright; Bruce A Craig; Regan L Bailey; Heather A Eicher-Miller Journal: J Nutr Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Cori Lorts; Natasha Tasevska; Marc A Adams; Michael J Yedidia; David Tulloch; Steven P Hooker; Punam Ohri-Vachaspati Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2019-02-08 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Edgar R Miller; Lisa A Cooper; Kathryn A Carson; Nae-Yuh Wang; Lawrence J Appel; Debra Gayles; Jeanne Charleston; Karen White; Na You; Yingjie Weng; Michelle Martin-Daniels; Barbara Bates-Hopkins; Inez Robb; Whitney K Franz; Emily L Brown; Jennifer P Halbert; Michael C Albert; Arlene T Dalcin; Hsin-Chieh Yeh Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-08-29 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Carmen R Isasi; Molly Jung; Christina M Parrinello; Robert C Kaplan; Ryung Kim; Noe C Crespo; Patricia Gonzalez; Natalia A Gouskova; Frank J Penedo; Krista M Perreira; Tatiana Perrino; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Linda Van Horn; Linda C Gallo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 3.240