Literature DB >> 32559278

Diet Quality and Associations with Food Security among Women Eligible for Indiana Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education.

Rebecca L Rivera1, Yumin Zhang2, Qi Wang2, Melissa K Maulding3, Janet A Tooze4, Breanne N Wright1, Bruce A Craig2, Regan L Bailey1, Heather A Eicher-Miller1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diet quality among adults receiving nutrition education lessons through Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education (SNAP-Ed) is currently unknown.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to characterize the diet quality of Indiana SNAP-Ed-eligible women; estimate their mean usual intake of fruits, vegetables, dairy, and whole grains compared to Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) recommendations; and determine if these dietary outcomes differed by food security status.
METHODS: SNAP-Ed paraprofessionals recruited participants from August 2015 to May 2016 for this secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected as the baseline assessment for a randomized controlled trial. Participants were SNAP-Ed-eligible women aged ≥18 y interested in nutrition education lessons. Dietary outcomes were assessed by one or two 24-h dietary recalls. The Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2010 was used to characterize diet quality. Mean usual intake of food groups was estimated using the National Cancer Institute Method. Food security status was classified using the US Household Food Security Survey Module. Data were analyzed in October 2019.
RESULTS: Mean ± SEM HEI-2010 total score was 42 ± 0.9 for the study sample. Mean ± SE usual intake of servings of fruits (0.61 ± 0.08 cups [144.32 ± 18.93 mL]), vegetables [1.4 ± 0.10 cups (331.2 ± 23.66 mL)], dairy [1.5 ± 0.11 cups (354.88 ± 26.02 mL)], and whole grains [0.48 ± 0.06 ounces (13.61 ± 1.70 g)] did not differ by food security subgroup. Mean HEI-2010 total score was significantly higher by 4.8 ± 2.0 points for the food-secure than for the food-insecure subgroup (P = 0.01). Mean HEI-2010 component scores were 1.1 ± 0.5 points higher for whole grain (P = 0.01) and 1.0 ± 0.5 points higher for dairy (P = 0.05) in the food-secure than in the food-insecure subgroup. The proportions of the study sample not meeting the DGA recommendations for food group intake were ≥85% for both food-secure and -insecure subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Indiana SNAP-Ed-eligible women reported poor diet quality, highlighting their need for nutrition interventions aiming to improve food security and diet as per DGA recommendations in low-income populations.
Copyright © The Author(s) on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNAP; SNAP-Ed; diet quality; food insecurity; low-income; nutrition education

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32559278      PMCID: PMC7690761          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  35 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating food stamp nutrition education: process for development and validation of evaluation measures.

Authors:  Marilyn S Townsend
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Development of the Healthy Eating Index-2005.

Authors:  Patricia M Guenther; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-11

3.  Usual Intake Distribution of Vitamins and Prevalence of Inadequacy in a Large Sample of Iranian At-Risk Population: Application of NCI Method.

Authors:  Zahra Heidari; Awat Feizi; Leila Azadbakht; Nizal Sarrafzadegan
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation is associated with an increase in household food security in a national evaluation.

Authors:  James Mabli; Jim Ohls
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Food insecurity and dietary quality in US adults and children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karla L Hanson; Leah M Connor
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Food insecurity is inversely associated with diet quality of lower-income adults.

Authors:  Cindy W Leung; Elissa S Epel; Lorrene D Ritchie; Patricia B Crawford; Barbara A Laraia
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  The Provision of Assistance Does Not Substantially Impact the Accuracy of 24-Hour Dietary Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-H Dietary Assessment Tool among Women with Low Incomes.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Patricia M Guenther; Deirdre Douglass; Thea Zimmerman; Lisa L Kahle; Abiodun Atoloye; Michelle Marcinow; Mateja R Savoie-Roskos; Kevin W Dodd; Carrie Durward
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 8.  Applications of the Healthy Eating Index for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Intervention Research: Considerations and Caveats.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith; TusaRebecca E Pannucci; Amy F Subar; Magdalena M Wilson; Jennifer L Lerman; Janet A Tooze
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  Diet Quality as Assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Score, and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Lukas Schwingshackl; Berit Bogensberger; Georg Hoffmann
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.910

10.  A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a SNAP-Ed Farmers' Market-Based Nutrition Education Program.

Authors:  Rachel Dannefer; Alyson Abrami; Rebecca Rapoport; Pathu Sriphanlop; Rachel Sacks; Michael Johns
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.045

View more
  3 in total

1.  Women's health: optimal nutrition throughout the lifecycle.

Authors:  Edith J M Feskens; Regan Bailey; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Hans-Konrad Biesalski; Heather Eicher-Miller; Klaus Krämer; Wen-Harn Pan; James C Griffiths
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.865

2.  Food Insecurity and Less Frequent Cooking Dinner at Home Are Associated with Lower Diet Quality in a National Sample of Low-Income Adults in the United States during the Initial Months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Authors:  Julia A Wolfson; Hannah Posluszny; Selma Kronsteiner-Gicevic; Walter Willett; Cindy W Leung
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 5.234

Review 3.  Food Insecurity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk.

Authors:  Yibin Liu; Heather A Eicher-Miller
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.113

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.