Literature DB >> 25104978

How Broadband Speech May Avoid Neural Firing Rate Saturation at High Intensities and Maintain Intelligibility.

R M Warren, J A Bashford, P W Lenz.   

Abstract

While broadband speech may remain perfectly intelligible at levels exceeding 90 dB, narrowband speech intelligibility (e.g., 2/3-octave passband centered at 1.5 kHz) may decline by 25% or more at moderate intensities (e.g., 75 dB). This "rollover" effect is substantially reduced, however, when a speech band is accompanied by flanking bands of white noise [J.A. Bashford, R.M. Warren, & P.W. Lenz, 2005, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 365-369 (2005)], suggesting that lateral suppression helps preserve broadband speech intelligibility at high levels. The present study found that when noise flankers were presented individually at a low spectrum level (-30 dB relative to the speech) only the higher-frequency flanker produced a significant intelligibility increase. However, the lower-frequency flanking noise did produce an equivalent increase when its spectrum level was raised 10 dB. This asymmetrical intensity requirement for noise flankers links the effective dynamic range of speech intelligibility to reported characteristics of both lateral (two-tone) suppression of auditory nerve (AN) fiber activity and lateral inhibition of secondary cells of the cochlear nucleus. These and other observations will be discussed in the broader context of how various auditory mechanisms help preserve speech intelligibility at high intensities by reducing firing rate saturation. [Supported by NIH.].

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 25104978      PMCID: PMC4122243          DOI: 10.1121/1.4800218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust


  25 in total

1.  Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.

Authors:  G A Studebaker; R L Sherbecoe; D M McDaniel; C A Gwaltney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry.

Authors:  S R SILVERMAN; I J HIRSH
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 3.  Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Specialized neuronal adaptation for preserving input sensitivity.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.

Authors:  D F Dolan; A L Nuttall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate.

Authors:  M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Enhancing the intelligibility of high intensity speech: Evidence of inhibition in the lower auditory pathway.

Authors:  James A Bashford; Richard M Warren; Peter W Lenz
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2011-10-07

8.  Dynamic range adaptation to sound level statistics in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Grace I Wang; Isabel Dean; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Level dependence of cochlear nucleus onset unit responses and facilitation by second tones or broadband noise.

Authors:  I M Winter; A R Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human medial olivocochlear reflex: effects as functions of contralateral, ipsilateral, and bilateral elicitor bandwidths.

Authors:  Watjana Lilaonitkul; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.