| Literature DB >> 25104140 |
Luan-Jing Zhang, Ke-Bing Wang, Long-Shan Liu, Lian-Zhou Chen, Bao-Gang Peng, Li-Jian Liang, Zhi Li, Ling Xue, Wen Li1, Jing-Tang Xia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Golgi phosphoprotein 3 (GOLPH3) has been identified as an oncoprotein in various human cancers; however, its role in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unknown. We examined GOLPH3 expression levels and relationship with survival in patients with PDAC to establish the significance of GOLPH3 in the development and progression of PDAC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25104140 PMCID: PMC4133629 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-571
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Correlations between GOLPH3 expression and clinicopathologic features in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
| Expression of GOLPH3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinicopathological feature | Total | Low (n = 30, 27.5%) | High (n = 79, 72.5%) |
|
|
| ||||
| <61 | 49 | 16 (32.7%) | 33 (67.3%) | 0.278 |
| ≥61 | 60 | 14 (23.3%) | 46 (76.7%) | |
|
| ||||
| Male | 68 | 18 (26.5%) | 50 (73.5%) | 0.751 |
| Female | 41 | 12 (29.3%) | 29 (70.7%) | |
|
| ||||
| Head | 87 | 25 (28.7%) | 62 (71.3%) | 0.573 |
| Body/tail | 22 | 5 (22.7%) | 17 (77.3%) | |
|
| ||||
| I | 15 | 7 (46.7%) | 8 (53.3%) |
|
| II | 50 | 6 (12.0%) | 44 (88.0%) | |
| III | 22 | 7 (31.8%) | 15 (68.2%) | |
| IV | 22 | 10 (45.5%) | 12 (54.5%) | |
|
| ||||
| Well | 7 | 2 (28.6%) | 5 (71.4%) | 0.949 |
| Moderate/poor | 102 | 28 (27.5%) | 74 (72.5%) | |
|
| ||||
| ≤2 cm | 17 | 7 (41.2%) | 10 (58.8%) | 0.170 |
| >2 cm | 92 | 23 (25.0%) | 69 (75.0%) | |
|
| ||||
| T1 | 5 | 2 (40.0%) | 3 (60.0%) |
|
| T2 | 25 | 10 (40.0%) | 15 (60.0%) | |
| T3 | 48 | 6 (12.5%) | 42 (87.5%) | |
| T4 | 31 | 12 (38.7%) | 19 (61.3%) | |
|
| ||||
| Absent | 56 | 20 (35.7%) | 36 (64.3%) |
|
| Present | 53 | 10 (18.9%) | 43 (81.1%) | |
|
| ||||
| Absent | 87 | 20 (22.7%) | 67 (77.3%) |
|
| Present | 22 | 10 (47.6%) | 12 (52.4%) | |
|
| ||||
| Radical resection | 69 | 19 (27.5%) | 50 (72.5%) | 0.997 |
| Palliative resection | 40 | 11 (27.5%) | 29 (72.5%) | |
|
| ||||
| Dead | 97 | 27 (27.8%) | 70 (72.2%) | 0.836 |
| Alive | 12 | 3 (25.0%) | 9 (75.0%) | |
*Statistically significant; pTNM: tumor-node-metastasis classification pancreatic cancer staging.
Figure 1Expression of GOLPH3 is upregulated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). (A) Western blots show the expression levels of GOLPH3 protein in four PDAC tumor tissues (T) and their paired adjacent noncancerous tissues (ANT); β-actin was used as loading control. (B) Real-time qPCR analysis shows the expression levels of GOLPH3 mRNA in PDAC tumor tissues relative to their paired adjacent noncancerous tissues (T/ANT). Values are given as a ratio of β-actin expression. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (C) Immunohistochemical staining shows the levels and localization of GOLPH3 protein in the four PDAC tumor tissues compared to their paired adjacent no cancerous tissues; (magnification, ×200).
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic parameters for survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prognostic parameter | 95% CI | 95% CI | ||||||
| RR | Lower | Upper |
| RR | Lower | Upper |
| |
|
| 1.915 | 1.186 | 3.092 |
| 2.733 | 1.578 | 4.732 |
|
|
| 0.977 | 0.643 | 1.484 | 0.913 | 1.008 | 0.647 | 1.571 | 0.972 |
|
| 1.295 | 0.865 | 1.938 | 0.209 | 1.319 | 0.840 | 2.073 | 0.229 |
|
| 0.882 | 0.521 | 1.493 | 0.640 | 0.619 | 0.349 | 1.100 | 0.102 |
|
| 1.402 | 0.610 | 3.223 | 0.426 | 0.760 | 0.308 | 1.874 | 0.760 |
|
| 1.940 | 1.095 | 3.437 |
| 1.557 | 0.841 | 2.883 | 0.159 |
|
| 1.187 | 0.941 | 1.496 | 0.148 | 1.001 | 0.658 | 1.521 | 0.998 |
|
| 1.075 | 0.718 | 1.611 | 0.725 | 0.608 | 0.386 | 0.957 |
|
|
| 1.288 | 0.779 | 2.130 | 0.324 | 1.002 | 0.319 | 3.152 | 0.997 |
|
| 1.243 | 1.014 | 1.523 |
| 1.420 | 0.776 | 2.598 | 0.255 |
|
| 2.444 | 1.609 | 3.710 |
| 2.828 | 1.745 | 4.584 |
|
Univariate analysis and multivariate analyses were analyzed by Cox regression.
*Statistically significant; RR: Relative Risk; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
Figure 2GOLPH3 expression is correlated with overall survival in patients with PDAC. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves show the statistical differences in survival times between PDAC patients with high levels of GOLPH3 expression and those with low levels of GOLPH3 expression. P-values were calculated by log-rank test.
Figure 3Overall survival is lower in PDAC patients with high GOLPH3 expression, independent of clinical stage. Kaplan-Meier survival curves show the statistical differences in overall survival between PDAC patients with high and low expressions of GOLPH3 according to clinical stage: (A) early clinical stage (I–II) subgroup; (B) advanced clinical stage (II–IV) subgroup. P-values were calculated by log-rank test.
Figure 4Overall survival is lower in PDAC patients with high GOLPH3 expression, independent of lymph node metastases status. Kaplan-Meier survival curves show the statistical differences in overall survival between PDAC patients classified according to lymph node metastasis status and GOLPH3 expression: (A) patients without lymph node metastasis; (B) patients with lymph node metastasis. P-values were calculated by log-rank test.
Figure 5Overall survival is lower in PDAC in patients with high GOLPH3 expression, independent of liver metastasis status. Kaplan-Meier survival curves show the statistical differences in overall survival between PDAC patients classified according to liver metastasis status and of GOLPH3 expression: (A) patients without liver metastasis; (B) patients with liver metastasis. P-values were calculated by log-rank test.