Literature DB >> 25101608

Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.

Madhusudhan R Sanaka1, Tushar Gohel, Amareshwar Podugu, Ravi P Kiran, Prashanthi N Thota, Rocio Lopez, James M Church, Carol A Burke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adenoma detection rate is an important quality indicator. High adenoma detection rate is related to fewer interval cancers. Interval cancers arise from sessile serrated polyps, often in the proximal colon. The detection of adenomas and sessile serrated polyps by location may enhance colonoscopy efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine entire colon and segmental adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates and to assess the impact of endoscopist specialty on polyp detection.
DESIGN: Colonoscopies performed by 65 multispecialty endoscopists were studied.
SETTING: This study was conducted at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Average-risk outpatients undergoing screening colonoscopy were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Polyp detection rates were determined by sex, colon segment, and each endoscopist.
RESULTS: Included were 2167 patients. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates were 25% and 2% and not significantly different by specialty of the endoscopist. The adenoma detection rate was higher in men (31%) than in women (20%), including each segment in the colon. It was higher proximally (20%) than distally (16%) (p = 0.027) in men, but no different in proximal (11%) and distal colon (11%) (p = 0.66) in women. Sessile serrated polyp detection was the same in men and women at 2% (p = 0.84) and 3-fold higher in the proximal than in the distal colon (1.4% vs 0.5%), but only significantly so in women (p = 0.041). We found a poor correlation between adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates (r = 0.35). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Prevalent adenomas are detected more often in men than in women, including overall and by colon segment. The proximal adenoma detection rate is significantly higher than the distal adenoma detection rate in men, but segmental rates are similar in women. Sessile serrated polyp detection rates are low, albeit 3-fold higher in the proximal colon, and are found as frequently in men and women. High-quality colonoscopy, as evidenced by adenoma detection rate, varies by endoscopist but is independent of colonoscopist subspecialty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25101608     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  24 in total

1.  Proximal Sessile Polyps: Raised Expectations for the Detection of Flat Lesions.

Authors:  Pamela Lu; Adam C Fields; Nelya Melnitchouk
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection.

Authors:  Ronald G Racho; Murli Krishna; Susan G Coe; Colleen S Thomas; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Rohan Mandaliya; Kamal Baig; Michele Barnhill; Vagishwari Murugesan; Aniruddh Som; Usman Mohammed; Khushali Jhaveri; Shiva Shankar Vangimalla; Allyson Raymond; Jennifer Tran; Lubaba Hasan; James H Lewis; Won Cho
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.

Authors:  Sandy Ng; Aditya K Sreenivasan; Jillian Pecoriello; Peter S Liang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Sessile serrated polyps: detection, eradication, and prevention of the evil twin.

Authors:  Joshua C Obuch; Courtney M Pigott; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03

6.  Adenoma detection rate: the perfect colonoscopy quality measure or is there more?

Authors:  Brian Liem; Neil Gupta
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-03-21

7.  Predicting ADR from PDR and individual adenoma-to-polyp-detection-rate ratio for screening and surveillance colonoscopies: A new approach to quality assessment.

Authors:  C Schramm; I Scheller; J Franklin; M Demir; F Kuetting; D Nierhoff; T Goeser; U Toex; H M Steffen
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  Endoscopist factors that influence serrated polyp detection: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Michele Morris; David S Carrell; Sherri Rose; Zhuo Shi; Julia B Greer; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.

Authors:  Shashank Sarvepalli; Ari Garber; Michael B Rothberg; Gautam Mankaney; John McMichael; Gareth Morris-Stiff; John J Vargo; Maged K Rizk; Carol A Burke
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Annie Thibault; Renay Caldwell; Michele J Josey; Beidi Qiang; Edsel Peña; Delecia LaFrance; Franklin G Berger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.