Literature DB >> 25100694

Gamete evolution and sperm numbers: sperm competition versus sperm limitation.

Geoff A Parker1, Jussi Lehtonen2.   

Abstract

Both gamete competition and gamete limitation can generate anisogamy from ancestral isogamy, and both sperm competition (SC) and sperm limitation (SL) can increase sperm numbers. Here, we compare the marginal benefits due to these two components at any given population level of sperm production using the risk and intensity models in sperm economics. We show quite generally for the intensity model (where N males compete for each set of eggs) that however severe the degree of SL, if there is at least one competitor for fertilization (N - 1 ≥ 1), the marginal gains through SC exceed those for SL, provided that the relationship between the probability of fertilization (F) and increasing sperm numbers (x) is a concave function. In the risk model, as fertility F increases from 0 to 1.0, the threshold SC risk (the probability q that two males compete for fertilization) for SC to be the dominant force drops from 1.0 to 0. The gamete competition and gamete limitation theories for the evolution of anisogamy rely on very similar considerations: our results imply that gamete limitation could dominate only if ancestral reproduction took place in highly isolated, small spawning groups.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  anisogamy evolution; evolution of two sexes; sperm competition; sperm limitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100694      PMCID: PMC4132674          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  12 in total

1.  How severe is sperm limitation in natural populations of marine free-spawners?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Sperm competition and ejaculate economics.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2010-11

3.  Cooperation and the evolution of anisogamy.

Authors:  Jiang-Nan Yang
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Gametic conflict versus contact in the evolution of anisogamy.

Authors:  Priya Iyer; Joan Roughgarden
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Sperm limitation in the sea.

Authors:  D R Levitan; C Petersen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 6.  Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon.

Authors:  G A Parker; R R Baker; V G Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Correlation between sperm "redundancy" and chiasma frequency.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  On the relationship between the number of spermatozoa and the probability of conception.

Authors:  D Schwartz; P D Macdonald; V Heuchel
Journal:  Reprod Nutr Dev       Date:  1981

10.  Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1982-05-21       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  7 in total

1.  Isogamy in large and complex volvocine algae is consistent with the gamete competition theory of the evolution of anisogamy.

Authors:  Jack da Silva; Victoria L Drysdale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Unravelling anisogamy: egg size and ejaculate size mediate selection on morphology in free-swimming sperm.

Authors:  Keyne Monro; Dustin J Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Sexual selection after gamete release in broadcast spawning invertebrates.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Rowan A Lymbery
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Models of fertilization kinetics.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  The evolution of sexes: A specific test of the disruptive selection theory.

Authors:  Jack da Silva
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  How Soon Hath Time… A History of Two "Seminal" Publications.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  The Legacy of Parker, Baker and Smith 1972: Gamete Competition, the Evolution of Anisogamy, and Model Robustness.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.