Literature DB >> 22984191

Sperm wars and the evolution of male fertility.

Leigh W Simmons1, John L Fitzpatrick.   

Abstract

Females frequently mate with several males, whose sperm then compete to fertilize available ova. Sperm competition represents a potent selective force that is expected to shape male expenditure on the ejaculate. Here, we review empirical data that illustrate the evolutionary consequences of sperm competition. Sperm competition favors the evolution of increased testes size and sperm production. In some species, males appear capable of adjusting the number of sperm ejaculated, depending on the perceived levels of sperm competition. Selection is also expected to act on sperm form and function, although the evidence for this remains equivocal. Comparative studies suggest that sperm length and swimming speed may increase in response to selection from sperm competition. However, the mechanisms driving this pattern remain unclear. Evidence that sperm length influences sperm swimming speed is mixed and fertilization trials performed across a broad range of species demonstrate inconsistent relationships between sperm form and function. This ambiguity may in part reflect the important role that seminal fluid proteins (sfps) play in affecting sperm function. There is good evidence that sfps are subject to selection from sperm competition, and recent work is pointing to an ability of males to adjust their seminal fluid chemistry in response to sperm competition from rival males. We argue that future research must consider sperm and seminal fluid components of the ejaculate as a functional unity. Research at the genomic level will identify the genes that ultimately control male fertility.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22984191     DOI: 10.1530/REP-12-0285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reproduction        ISSN: 1470-1626            Impact factor:   3.906


  87 in total

1.  Sperm number trumps sperm size in mammalian ejaculate evolution.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Scott Pitnick; Kirstin S Berben; Cecilia S Blengini; John M Belote; Mollie K Manier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Last mated male sperm precedence in doubly mated females is not ubiquitous: evidence from sperm competition in laboratory populations of Drosophila nasuta nasuta and Drosophila nasuta albomicans.

Authors:  B Shruthi; S R Ramesh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Human testis-specific genes are under relaxed negative selection.

Authors:  Denis Pierron; Harilanto Razafindrazaka; Christophe Rocher; Thierry Letellier; Lawrence I Grossman
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Predation shapes sperm performance surfaces in guppies.

Authors:  Alessandro Devigili; Jonathan P Evans; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Leigh W Simmons; Cyril C Grueter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sperm competition accentuates selection on ejaculate attributes.

Authors:  Pauline Vuarin; Yves Hingrat; Loïc Lesobre; Michel Saint Jalme; Frédéric Lacroix; Gabriele Sorci
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 8.  The sexual cascade and the rise of pre-ejaculatory (Darwinian) sexual selection, sex roles, and sexual conflict.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Gamete evolution and sperm numbers: sperm competition versus sperm limitation.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker; Jussi Lehtonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Female control over multiple matings increases the opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.