The organometallic H-cluster at the active site of [FeFe]-hydrogenases is synthesized by three accessory proteins, two of which are radical S-adenosylmethionine enzymes (HydE, HydG) and one of which is a GTPase (HydF). In this work we probed the specific role of H atom abstraction in HydG-catalyzed carbon monoxide and cyanide production from tyrosine. The isotope distributions of 5'-deoxyadenosine and p-cresol were evaluated using deuterium-labeled tyrosine substrates in H2O and D2O. The observation of multiply deuterated 5'-deoxyadenosine and deuterated S-adenosylmethionine when the reaction is carried out in D2O provides evidence for a 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical-mediated abstraction of a hydrogen atom from a solvent-exchangeable position as a reversible event.
The organometallic H-cluster at the active site of [FeFe]-hydrogenases is synthesized by three accessory proteins, two of which are radicalS-adenosylmethionine enzymes (HydE, HydG) and one of which is a GTPase (HydF). In this work we probed the specific role of H atom abstraction in HydG-catalyzed carbon monoxide and cyanide production from tyrosine. The isotope distributions of 5'-deoxyadenosine and p-cresol were evaluated using deuterium-labeled tyrosine substrates in H2O and D2O. The observation of multiply deuterated 5'-deoxyadenosine and deuterated S-adenosylmethionine when the reaction is carried out in D2O provides evidence for a 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical-mediated abstraction of a hydrogen atom from a solvent-exchangeable position as a reversible event.
Hydrogen metabolism
in microorganisms
involves the activation of dihydrogen through complex iron–sulfur
(Fe–S) active-site catalysts.[1] The
[FeFe]-hydrogenase H-cluster contains an unusual organometallic 2Fe
subcluster in which the irons are coordinated by three carbon monoxides
(CO), two cyanides (CN–), a dithiomethylamine, and
a cysteine thiolate that bridges this entity to a [4Fe-4S] cluster
(Figure 1).[2] The
2Fe subcluster is synthesized by dedicated maturation machinery consisting
of HydF, a GTPase that serves as a scaffold or carrier,[3,300] and HydE and HydG, both radicalS-adenosylmethionine
(SAM) enzymes.[5,100] While HydE has been proposed
to synthesize the dithiolate ligand,[6] HydG
synthesizes the diatomic ligands of the H-cluster from tyrosine (Tyr)
in a reaction that produces p-cresol, CO, and CN– and requires two discrete C–C bond cleavage
events (Figure 2).[4−9]
Figure 1
[FeFe]-hydrogenase H-cluster active site
from Clostridium
pasteurianum (PDB: 3C8Y).
Figure 2
Reaction catalyzed by
HydG. Top: Conversion of tyrosine to p-cresol, CO,
and CN−. Concomitant with
this reaction, SAM is converted to methionine and 5′-deoxyadenosine.
Bottom: Two [4Fe-4S] clusters are involved. The N-terminal cluster
binds and reductively cleaves SAM, and is required for the cleavage
of tyrosine to produce p-cresol. The C-terminal cluster
is important for diatomic ligand production, and the unique iron of
this cluster may provide a site for diatomic ligand coordination prior
to transfer to HydF. The cysteine motifs coordinating each cluster
are shown below the cluster.
[FeFe]-hydrogenase H-cluster active site
from Clostridium
pasteurianum (PDB: 3C8Y).Reaction catalyzed by
HydG. Top: Conversion of tyrosine to p-cresol, CO,
and CN−. Concomitant with
this reaction, SAM is converted to methionine and 5′-deoxyadenosine.
Bottom: Two [4Fe-4S] clusters are involved. The N-terminal cluster
binds and reductively cleaves SAM, and is required for the cleavage
of tyrosine to produce p-cresol. The C-terminal cluster
is important for diatomic ligand production, and the unique iron of
this cluster may provide a site for diatomic ligand coordination prior
to transfer to HydF. The cysteine motifs coordinating each cluster
are shown below the cluster.RadicalSAM enzymes generally catalyze the reductive cleavage
of
SAM to produce methionine and a 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical intermediate
(dAdo•); the latter species abstracts a hydrogen
atom from substrate to produce 5′-deoxyadenosine (dAdoH).[10] In the case of HydG, reductive cleavage of SAM
occurs at a N-terminal site-differentiated [4Fe-4S] cluster coordinated
by a CX3CX2C motif,[11] producing dAdoH in slight excess over p-cresol
and cyanide due to a small amount of uncoupled SAM cleavage.[8] HydG also coordinates a second [4Fe-4S] cluster
near the C-terminus at a CX2CX22C motif[11] that is essential for catalysis.[13] While the N-terminal cluster of HydG is required
for reductive cleavage of SAM and tyrosineCα−Cβ bond cleavage to produce p-cresol,
the C-terminal cluster and/or residues in the C-terminal domain are
essential for the production of the diatomic products.[11,14,15] Recent results suggest that the
diatomic products of HydG may coordinate an Fe of this C-terminal
cluster, extruding the Fe to form a precursor of the 2Fe subcluster
of the H cluster.[16]To investigate
the mechanism by which HydG initiates tyrosine cleavage,
specifically deuterated Tyr substrates and/or deuterated solvent was
used in enzymatic assays, and deuterium incorporation into dAdoH and
SAM was monitored. Clostridium acetobutylicum HydG
was expressed in Escherichia coli, was purified anaerobically,
and was chemically reconstituted with Fe and S; this protein was found
to exhibit visible and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic
properties similar to those previously reported.[4,11] Assays
for HydG-catalyzed dAdoH formation were carried out in an anaerobic
chamber (MBraun, O2 < 1 ppm) in sealed 1.5 mL Eppendorf
tubes, containing HydG (100 μM with 7.1 ± 0.2 mol Fe per
mol enzyme) in buffer (50 mM tris, pH 8.1, 300 mM KCl, 5% (w/v) glycerol),
5 mM dithionite, 1 mM Tyr, and 1 mM SAM at 37 °C, similar to
assays reported previously.[4] Reaction products
were analyzed by ESI-MS following enzyme precipitation with 1 M HCl
(13% v/v).HydG reactions carried out using Tyrdeuterium (D)
isotopologues
([β-D2]-Tyr, [ring-D4]-Tyr, and [α,ring-D5]-Tyr) in H2O yielded dAdoH isotope distributions comparable
to natural abundance dAdoH (Figure S1),
and insignificant loss of label in the p-cresol product
(Figure S2). Since these isotopologues
span all nonexchangeable positions on Tyr, the results indicate that
the dAdo• generated upon reductive cleavage of SAM
abstracts only at a solvent-exchangeable position. This hypothesis
was confirmed when the HydG reaction was carried out with natural
abundance Tyr in D2O buffer (50 mM tris, pD 8.1, 95% D),
as significant changes in the isotope distribution of dAdoH were observed
(Figure 3). The dAdoH product isolated from
the reaction in D2O buffer consisted of a mixture of singly,
doubly, and triply deuterated dAdoH, with 82% of dAdoH containing
at least one D (Table S1). When Tyr was
omitted from the assay performed in D2O, no dAdoH could
be detected by LC-MS; in H2O, a small amount of dAdoH could
be detected, indicative of nonproductive SAM cleavage (data not shown).
A similar observation of the incorporation of deuterium from a solvent
exchangeable position into dAdoH has been made for HydG from Shewanella oneidensis, however the analysis for multiple
deuterium incorporations was not carried out, and thus the mechanistic
implications we report here were not recognized or discussed.[24]
Figure 3
ESI-MS
of HydG reaction product dAdoH for assays performed in 95%
D2O buffer (50 mM tris, pD 8.1). (A) Full reaction. (B)
dAdoH reference sample in H2O. Spectra are represented
as normalized, extracted ion chromatograms.
Our results indicate that the D incorporation
into dAdoH shown
in Figure 3 requires the presence of Tyr. When
HydG was assayed in D2O, Tyr analogues lacking the phenolic
−OH (Phe), or the amino or carboxylate functional groups did
not serve as substrates, and likewise did not mediate deuterium transfer
to dAdoH (data not shown). Similarly, Phe has been described elsewhere
to neither stimulate dAdoH formation,[7] nor
stimulate activity in hydrogenase in vitro activation
experiments in H2O.[17] Only samples
that contained enzyme, dithionite as a reductant, SAM, and the substrate
Tyr in D2O buffer resulted in significant D transfer to
dAdoH. Possible sites for abstraction of a solvent-exchangeable H/D
in the HydG reaction include the phenol O–H or amino of Tyr,
or a protein residue in the active site. Given the requirement for
Tyr to observe D incorporation, and the precedence for biological
tyrosyl radicals generated by H atom abstraction from the phenolic
position,[18] we favor abstraction from the
Tyr O–H. Although abstraction from protein residues has not
been entirely ruled out, it is clear that there are no conserved Cys
residues in HydG beyond the six involved in Fe–S cluster coordination;
there are, however, several conserved Tyr residues.[7,15]ESI-MS
of HydG reaction product dAdoH for assays performed in 95%
D2O buffer (50 mM tris, pD 8.1). (A) Full reaction. (B)
dAdoH reference sample in H2O. Spectra are represented
as normalized, extracted ion chromatograms.HydG consumes SAM as a cosubstrate.[4,8,11] The observation of multiple D atoms being
incorporated
into dAdoH (Figure 3, Table
S1) was surprising, since the simple mechanistic model would
involve dAdo• abstracting a D from substrate to
produce singly deuterated dAdoH as a primary, rate-determining event.
Multiple D incorporations into the dAdoH product requires a more complex
mechanism in which, after formation of dAdoH, the dAdo• is regenerated and can abstract an additional H/D. Because the incorporation
of multiple D atoms into dAdoH requires the reversible generation
of dAdo•, which in turn could be coupled to reversible
cleavage of SAM, we investigated the possibility of D incorporation
into SAM during the HydG catalyzed reaction. SAM was isolated from
the optimized assay described above, and ESI-MS revealed that 56%
of the SAM contained at least one D (Figure 4, Table S2). In the absence of HydG, 9%
of the SAM was observed to incorporate D, consistent with previous
reports of slow exchange of the C-5′ hydrogens of SAM with
solvent;[19−21] assays run in the absence of Tyr produced low levels
of SAM deuteration similar to those observed when HydG was omitted
(Figure S3), demonstrating that a stimulated
incorporation of deuterium into SAM (Figure 4A) requires the presence of both enzyme and Tyr substrate. Assays
were carried out with SAM in a 10-fold excess over HydG; under these
conditions, 46% of the SAM underwent HydG-catalyzed exchange in the
presence of Tyr (Figure S3, Table S2).
Because HydG produces 4 equiv of dAdoH and 3 equiv of p-cresol under the assay conditions utilized herein,[11] the extent of deuteration of both SAM and dAdoH exceeds
the amount of p-cresol and diatomic products produced.
Importantly, the levels of deuterium incorporation into SAM and dAdoH
are appreciable, and are nearly equal. These observations point to
a SAM ↔ dAdo• + Met equilibrium in which
the dAdo• can be deuterated by interaction with
Tyr or Tyr cleavage products as outlined below.
Figure 4
ESI-MS of SAM for HydG
assays performed in 95% D2O buffer
(50 mM tris, pD 8.1). (A) Full reaction. (B) SAM reference sample
in H2O. Spectra are represented as normalized, extracted
ion chromatograms.
ESI-MS of SAM for HydG
assays performed in 95% D2O buffer
(50 mM tris, pD 8.1). (A) Full reaction. (B) SAM reference sample
in H2O. Spectra are represented as normalized, extracted
ion chromatograms.Abstraction of a hydrogen
atom from substrate by dAdo• is generally accepted
as a rate-limiting step in radicalSAM enzymes,[22] and thus substitution with D at the abstracted
position should give rise to an isotope effect. In order to examine
the solvent isotope effect on HydG catalysis, p-cresol
production was compared in identical assays performed in tris-H2O and tris-D2O buffer (Figure 5). The rate of p-cresol production in H2O and D2O was fitted to a first-order exponential,
revealing an apparent deuterium isotope effect of 1.71 (kcat-H/kcat-D). The magnitude of this kH/kD is consistent with a
primary isotope effect and provides further evidence that tyrosine
cleavage to produce p-cresol is initiated by H atom
abstraction from a solvent-exchangeable position in a step that is
partially rate-determining.
Figure 5
Quantitative p-cresol product
detection in tris-H2O (■) and 95% tris-D2O (▲). Assays
contained 40 μM HydG (9.5 ± 0.2 Fe/protein), 1 mM SAM,
1 mM Tyr, 5 mM dithionite, performed at 37 °C in 50 mM tris,
300 mM KCl, pH/pD 8.1.
Quantitative p-cresol product
detection in tris-H2O (■) and 95% tris-D2O (▲). Assays
contained 40 μM HydG (9.5 ± 0.2 Fe/protein), 1 mM SAM,
1 mM Tyr, 5 mM dithionite, performed at 37 °C in 50 mM tris,
300 mM KCl, pH/pD 8.1.The results presented herein provide evidence for a mechanism
of
HydG-catalyzed Tyr cleavage in which a SAM-derived dAdo• abstracts a hydrogen atom from a solvent-exchangeable position as
a reversible event. A single D incorporation into dAdoH when the assay
is carried out in D2O would be indicative of an essentially
irreversible substrate radical initiation event in which the substrate
radical proceeds on in the reaction without further interaction with
dAdoH. The observation of multiple D incorporations into dAdoH, and
D incorporation into SAM by HydG, shows the existence of multiple
reversible steps during turnover. Specifically, the tyrosyl radical
resulting from abstraction at the phenolic position could either proceed
forward with Cα–Cβ bond cleavage,
or could reabstract a hydrogen atom from dAdoH, quenching the substrate
radical to regenerate dAdo•; the dAdo• could abstract H/D from substrate or could recombine with methionine,
with transfer of an electron to the [4Fe-4S] cluster, to re-form SAM
(Figure 6A). Iterative abstraction–reabstraction
events carried out several times prior to productive TyrCα–Cβ bond cleavage would result in multiple
D atom incorporations into dAdoH and SAM following rapid solvent exchange
at the tyrosine phenolic position. This scheme is consistent with
radicalSAM enzymes that catalytically regenerate SAM, but is unusual
for enzymes such as HydG, that use SAM as a cosubstrate. Multiple
deuterium atoms are incorporated into dAdo during turnover of [3-2H]-2-deoxy-scyllo-inosamine by the radicalSAM enzyme BtrN in a mechanism that must require a reversible abstraction
by dAdo• at the C(3)-H of the substrate coupled
to multiple re-binding events with labeled substrate.[200] In the radicalSAM enzyme DesII, multiple
D atoms from labeled substrate have been detected in SAM, although
the dAdoH resulting from the forward reaction harbors only a single
deuteron.[26] Both BtrN and DesII catalyze
reactions in which the dAdo• abstracts from a nonexchangeable
position on substrate, unlike the abstraction from an exchangeable
position catalyzed by HydG.
Figure 6
Mechanistic proposals
for observed HydG H atom abstraction—reabstraction
events and dAdo• regeneration. Hydrogen atoms that
have undergone exchange with solvent are colored blue.
An energetic problem with reversible
abstraction at the phenolic
O–H of Tyr is that the abstraction of a hydrogen atom from
the 5′-methyl of dAdoH (BDE(C–H) = 100 kcal/mol)[23] by a tyrosyl radical to form Tyr (BDE(O–H)
= 86 kcal/mol)[18] would be thermodynamically
unfavorable, although the unfavorable process could be coupled to
the favorable process of re-forming SAM. Alternatively, the recently
characterized[24]p-cresolradical produced by TyrCα–Cβ bond cleavage could conceivably abstract a hydrogen from dAdoH to
generate dAdo•, which could then abstract an additional
phenolic O–H from Tyr, recombine with Met to form SAM, or undergo
termination with solvent. It should be noted, however, that a mechanism
involving regeneration of dAdo• by the p-cresol radical is not consistent with the roughly stoichiometric
dAdoH:p-cresol product formation previously reported.[8] Alternatively, the p-cresolradical could abstract an H atom on the intermediate dehydroglycine
(DHG), perhaps activating it for formation of CO and CN– (Figure 6B); GC-MS data show incorporation
of 1 D in p-cresol during the HydG reaction in D2O (Figure S4), consistent with
abstraction at a solvent exchangeable position of either the protein
or DHG (Figure 6B).Mechanistic proposals
for observed HydG H atom abstraction—reabstraction
events and dAdo• regeneration. Hydrogen atoms that
have undergone exchange with solvent are colored blue.The reversible abstraction events catalyzed by
HydG bear resemblance
to B12 chemistry, in which adenosylcobalamin serves as
a reversibly functioning “radical source”.[25] Similarly, radicalSAM enzymes that employ SAM
as a catalytic cofactor must also generate the central dAdo• radical reversibly. HydG, however, utilizes SAM as a cosubstrate
that is converted to dAdoH and Met during turnover, and yet the same
B12-like reversible radical generation occurs in this reaction.
Such reversibility in an enzyme utilizing SAM as a co-substrate is
indicative of a fundamental interplay between SAM, dAdo•, and the substrate that reflects the central role of SAM as a radical
reservoir in radicalSAM reactions. Elucidating the specific role
of the reversible radical chemistry in the HydG-catalyzed synthesis
of CO and CN– from Tyr, and the potential interaction
of the radical intermediates with the C-terminal cluster, await further
investigations.
Authors: Eric Pilet; Yvain Nicolet; Carole Mathevon; Thierry Douki; Juan C Fontecilla-Camps; Marc Fontecave Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Rebecca C Driesener; Martin R Challand; Shawn E McGlynn; Eric M Shepard; Eric S Boyd; Joan B Broderick; John W Peters; Peter L Roach Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Shawn E McGlynn; Eric M Shepard; Mark A Winslow; Anatoli V Naumov; Kaitlin S Duschene; Matthew C Posewitz; William E Broderick; Joan B Broderick; John W Peters Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Jon M Kuchenreuther; William K Myers; Daniel L M Suess; Troy A Stich; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Stacey A Shiigi; Stephen P Cramer; James R Swartz; R David Britt; Simon J George Journal: Science Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eric M Shepard; Florence Mus; Jeremiah N Betz; Amanda S Byer; Benjamin R Duffus; John W Peters; Joan B Broderick Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Jeremiah N Betz; Nicholas W Boswell; Corey J Fugate; Gemma L Holliday; Eyal Akiva; Anna G Scott; Patricia C Babbitt; John W Peters; Eric M Shepard; Joan B Broderick Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Amanda S Byer; Eric M Shepard; Michael W Ratzloff; Jeremiah N Betz; Paul W King; William E Broderick; Joan B Broderick Journal: J Biol Inorg Chem Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 3.358
Authors: Daniel L M Suess; Jon M Kuchenreuther; Liliana De La Paz; James R Swartz; R David Britt Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Hao Yang; Stella Impano; Eric M Shepard; Christopher D James; William E Broderick; Joan B Broderick; Brian M Hoffman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Stella Impano; Hao Yang; Eric M Shepard; Ryan Swimley; Adrien Pagnier; William E Broderick; Brian M Hoffman; Joan B Broderick Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Eric M Shepard; Stella Impano; Benjamin R Duffus; Adrien Pagnier; Kaitlin S Duschene; Jeremiah N Betz; Amanda S Byer; Amanda Galambas; Elizabeth C McDaniel; Hope Watts; Shawn E McGlynn; John W Peters; William E Broderick; Joan B Broderick Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 4.569