| Literature DB >> 25093026 |
Jenifer Bom1, Patrícia Gunutzmann1, Elizabeth C Pérez Hurtado1, Jussara M R Maragno-Correa2, Silvia Regina Kleeb3, Maria Anete Lallo1.
Abstract
We evaluated the preventive and therapeutic effects of aqueous suspensions of garlic, tomato, and garlic + tomato in the development of experimental Ehrlich tumors in mice. The aqueous suspensions (2%) were administered over a short term for 30 days before tumor inoculation and 12 days afterward, and suspensions at 6% were administered for 180 days before inoculation and for 12 days afterward. The volume, number, and characteristics of the tumor cells and AgNOR counts were determined to compare the different treatments. Aqueous 6% suspensions of garlic, tomato, and garlic + tomato given over the long term significantly reduced tumor growth but when given over the short term, they did not alter tumor growth.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25093026 PMCID: PMC4100256 DOI: 10.1155/2014/381649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Experimental design. Eight groups were constituted, that is, 2% or 6% garlic and/or tomato and an untreated group that received only water. Animals receiving a 2% suspension were treated for 30 days, and those that received a 6% suspension were treated for 180 days.
Average parameters of the Ehrlich tumors in the experimental groups treated with aqueous suspensions of garlic, tomato, or garlic + tomato over the short and long term.
| Groups | Ascitic volume (mL) | Solid mass tumor (mL) | Number of cells by mL (×108) | Total concentration of tumor cells (cells ×108) | Number of NORs/nuclei |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment 1 | |||||
| Garlic 2% | 10.0 ± 1.95 | 3.2 ± 0.39 | 2.94 ± 0.89 | 11.58 ± 4.75 | 16.45 ± 1.95 |
| Tomato 2% | 11 ± 1.79 | 4.0 ± 0.36 | 3.52 ± 0.24 | 10.94 ± 5.65 | 14.85 ± 2.52 |
| Garlic + tomato 2% | 10.5 ± 2.11 | 3.9 ± 0.89 | 3.25 ± 0.44 | 10.96 ± 3.89 | 15.48 ± 2.23 |
| Control | 12 ± 1.90 | 4.1 ± 0.56 | 4.38 ± 0.95 | 12.47 ± 5.10 | 18.67 ± 2.83 |
| Experiment 2 | |||||
| Garlic 6% | 8.0 ± 1.15∗ | 1.5 ± 0.39∗ | 1.15 ± 0.25∗ | 3.49 ± 0.86∗ | 10.24 ± 1.45∗ |
| Tomato 6% | 10 ± 1.97 | 3.0 ± 0.26 | 1.97 ± 0.16∗ | 6.03 ± 0.73∗ | 12.46 ± 1.87∗ |
| Garlic + tomato 6% | 7.9 ± 2.31∗ | 1.0 ± 1.17∗ | 1.00 ± 0.11∗ | 2.9 ± 1.60∗ | 11.37 ± 1.55∗ |
| Control | 11 ± 2.43 | 4.2 ± 0.90 | 3.46 ± 1.50 | 13.8 ± 8.10 | 19.22 ± 2.95 |
Data are represented as the means ± SD. *P < 0.05 in comparison to the control group (one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test).
Mean weight gain for animals from the two experiments before and after inoculation with an Ehrlich tumor.
| Experimental groups | Mean weight gain before inoculation (g) | Mean weight gain after inoculation (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Garlic | 5.00 ± 2.04 | 4.99 ± 2.1 |
| Tomato | 6.39 ± 1.66 | 4.11 ± 1.1 |
| Garlic + tomato | 3.54 ± 1.32∗ | 3.80 ± 1.4 |
| Control | 5.15 ± 0.92 | 4.52 ± 1.3 |
*Data are represented as the means ± SD. *P < 0.05 in comparison to the control group (one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test).