Literature DB >> 16811493

Collateral behavior of the pigeon during conditioned suppression of key pecking.

N Stein, H S Hoffman, C Stitt.   

Abstract

Ethological recording procedures measured collateral behavior in pigeons whose key-pecking performance was suppressed during a tone that ended with unavoidable electric shock. Independent recordings of gross behavior were made by two observers throughout 60-sec intervals immediately before, during, and after tone presentation. Results indicated significant reductions in the frequency of collateral movements and an increase in the time between successive movements during tone presentations. These effects were observed in all subjects, despite differences in the sequential patterns of behavior. Only partial recovery of the behavior evidenced before tone presentation was found during a 60-sec interval following shock. It was concluded that conditioned suppression procedures caused the bird to "freeze" during tone presentation and in this fashion produced a general inhibitory effect on ongoing overt activity, including key pecking.

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811493      PMCID: PMC1333784          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  PERSISTENT BEHAVIOR MAINTAINED BY UNAVOIDABLE SHOCKS.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W C RIDDLE; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Escape, exploratory, and food-seeking responses of rats in a novel situation.

Authors:  W I WELKER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-02

3.  A method for rapid conditioning of stable avoidance bar pressing behavior.

Authors:  R S FELDMAN; F J BREMNER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of unavoidable shocks on a multiple schedule having an avoidance component.

Authors:  M B WALLER; P F WALLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus factors in aversive controls: the generalization of conditioned suppression.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A flexible connector for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Avoidance conditioning as a factor in the effects of unavoidable shocks on food-reinforced behavior.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-06

8.  Maintenance of avoidance behavior by unavoidable shocks.

Authors:  M SIDMAN; R J HERRNSTEIN; D G CONRAD
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-12

9.  The organization of emotional behavior in mice.

Authors:  W W WILLINGHAM
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-08

10.  Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  8 in total

1.  Incompatability between the pigeons' unconditioned response to shock and the conditioned key-peck response.

Authors:  R F Smith; C R Gustavson; G L Gregor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Time-dependent changes in conditioned suppression.

Authors:  R C Howard; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Conditioned suppression of counting behavior in rats.

Authors:  D E Blackman; P Scruton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Audiogram of the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) from 16 Hz to 9 kHz.

Authors:  Evan M Hill
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Overt activity during conditioned suppression: a search for punishment artifacts.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; J Barrett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Avoidance response rates during a pre-food stimulus in monkeys.

Authors:  W W Henton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Audiogram of the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) from 2 Hz to 9 kHz.

Authors:  Evan M Hill; Gimseong Koay; Rickye S Heffner; Henry E Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) do not hear infrasound: the audiogram from 8 Hz to 10 kHz.

Authors:  Henry E Heffner; Gimseong Koay; Rickye S Heffner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.836

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.