Chandylen L Nightingale1, Barbara A Curbow2, John R Wingard3, Deidre B Pereira4, Giselle D Carnaby5. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA cnightin@wakehealth.edu. 2. School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA. 3. College of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 4. College of Public Health and Health Professions, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 5. College of Health and Public Affairs, Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot study was to (1) obtain preliminary data on changes in burden and quality of life in head and neck cancer caregivers during and shortly following patient radiotherapy, (2) assess the relationship between perceived social support and burden as well as perceived social support and quality of life in caregivers during radiotherapy, and (3) identify preferences for sources of support among caregivers during radiotherapy. METHODS: Caregivers completed burden and quality of life instruments at the start of patient radiotherapy (T1), 5 weeks into radiotherapy (T2), and 1 month post-radiotherapy (T3) and instruments for perceived social support and support preferences at T2 only. RESULTS: Caregivers showed a trend toward increased burden and worsened quality of life for the majority of subscales at T2 or T3 than at T1. Caregivers reported significantly lower esteem and significantly greater disruption at T2 than at T1 and significantly worse health at T3 than at T2. Higher perceived social support was typically associated with lower burden and higher quality of life at T2. Spouses/partners were the most commonly preferred source of support. DISCUSSION: These pilot findings suggest that caregivers experience psychosocial impairments during and shortly after patient radiotherapy, but more research using larger samples is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this pilot study was to (1) obtain preliminary data on changes in burden and quality of life in head and neck cancer caregivers during and shortly following patient radiotherapy, (2) assess the relationship between perceived social support and burden as well as perceived social support and quality of life in caregivers during radiotherapy, and (3) identify preferences for sources of support among caregivers during radiotherapy. METHODS: Caregivers completed burden and quality of life instruments at the start of patient radiotherapy (T1), 5 weeks into radiotherapy (T2), and 1 month post-radiotherapy (T3) and instruments for perceived social support and support preferences at T2 only. RESULTS: Caregivers showed a trend toward increased burden and worsened quality of life for the majority of subscales at T2 or T3 than at T1. Caregivers reported significantly lower esteem and significantly greater disruption at T2 than at T1 and significantly worse health at T3 than at T2. Higher perceived social support was typically associated with lower burden and higher quality of life at T2. Spouses/partners were the most commonly preferred source of support. DISCUSSION: These pilot findings suggest that caregivers experience psychosocial impairments during and shortly after patient radiotherapy, but more research using larger samples is warranted.
Authors: Paula R Sherwood; Barbara A Given; Heidi Donovan; Andrew Baum; Charles W Given; Catherine M Bender; Richard Schulz Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Daniel J Givens; Lucy Hynds Karnell; Anjali K Gupta; Gerald H Clamon; Nitin A Pagedar; Kristi E Chang; Douglas J Van Daele; Gerry F Funk Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2009-12
Authors: Margaret L Longacre; John A Ridge; Barbara A Burtness; Thomas J Galloway; Carolyn Y Fang Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Katharine E Duckworth; Richard P McQuellon; Gregory B Russell; Kathleen C Perry; Chandylen Nightingale; Perry Shen; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Bonny Morris; Edward A Levine Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Ronald Maggiore; Zachary S Zumsteg; Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc; Kelly M Trevino; Ajeet Gajra; Beatriz Korc-Grodzicki; Joel B Epstein; Stewart M Bond; Ira Parker; Julie A Kish; Barbara A Murphy; Noam A VanderWalde Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Valerie A Smith; Jennifer Lindquist; Katherine E M Miller; Megan Shepherd-Banigan; Maren Olsen; Margaret Campbell-Kotler; Jennifer Henius; Margaret Kabat; Courtney Harold Van Houtven Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2019-05-22
Authors: Simone M C H Langenberg; Carla M L van Herpen; Claudia C M van Opstal; Anke N M Wymenga; Winette T A van der Graaf; Judith B Prins Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 3.603