Joakim Isaksson1, Torben Wilms2,3, Göran Laurell4, Per Fransson5, Ylva Tiblom Ehrsson4. 1. Department of Social Work, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden. joakim.isaksson@umu.se. 2. Department of Medical Biosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 3. Department of Clinical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 4. Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 5. Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate employment status at diagnosis, sick leave, and returning to work patterns in correlation to quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) and (2) to explore patients' experiences of the process of returning to work. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with HNC (aged 34-66 years) were repeatedly interviewed over a period of 24 months. Interview responses that concerned the patients' experiences and ideas about work were categorised using the similarities-differences technique. Questionnaires on quality of life, anxiety, and depression were used to describe the patient characteristics and the differences between groups. RESULTS: In total, 53% of the patients had returned to work at 24 months after treatment, and 17% were deceased. Several quality of life parameters were significantly worse for patients not working at 24 months after treatment. Nine categories were found to describe the return-to-work process starting with symptoms causing sick leave, thoughts about the sick leave, and ending with the return to work and/or retirement. CONCLUSIONS: Returning to work is an important part of life because it structures everyday life and strengthens the individual's identity. The quality of life results showed significant differences between workers and non-workers at the 24-month follow-up. The patients need to be both physically and mentally prepared for the process of returning to work. It is important to take an individual rehabilitation approach to guide and support the patients in returning to work and regaining an important aspect of their everyday life. In such an approach, it is vital to understand the patients' overall life context and the patients' own perspective on the process and meaning associated with work.
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate employment status at diagnosis, sick leave, and returning to work patterns in correlation to quality of life, anxiety, and depression in patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) and (2) to explore patients' experiences of the process of returning to work. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with HNC (aged 34-66 years) were repeatedly interviewed over a period of 24 months. Interview responses that concerned the patients' experiences and ideas about work were categorised using the similarities-differences technique. Questionnaires on quality of life, anxiety, and depression were used to describe the patient characteristics and the differences between groups. RESULTS: In total, 53% of the patients had returned to work at 24 months after treatment, and 17% were deceased. Several quality of life parameters were significantly worse for patients not working at 24 months after treatment. Nine categories were found to describe the return-to-work process starting with symptoms causing sick leave, thoughts about the sick leave, and ending with the return to work and/or retirement. CONCLUSIONS: Returning to work is an important part of life because it structures everyday life and strengthens the individual's identity. The quality of life results showed significant differences between workers and non-workers at the 24-month follow-up. The patients need to be both physically and mentally prepared for the process of returning to work. It is important to take an individual rehabilitation approach to guide and support the patients in returning to work and regaining an important aspect of their everyday life. In such an approach, it is vital to understand the patients' overall life context and the patients' own perspective on the process and meaning associated with work.
Entities:
Keywords:
Everyday life; Head and neck cancer; Quality of life; Return to work; Sick leave
Authors: K Bjordal; E Hammerlid; M Ahlner-Elmqvist; A de Graeff; M Boysen; J F Evensen; A Biörklund; J R de Leeuw; P M Fayers; M Jannert; T Westin; S Kaasa Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Feuerstein; Briana L Todd; Michal C Moskowitz; Gina L Bruns; Mallori R Stoler; Thomas Nassif; Xinhua Yu Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: K Kobayashi; S Morita; M Shimonagayoshi; M Kobayashi; Y Fujiki; Y Uchida; K Yamaguchi Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Monique C J Leensen; Iris F Groeneveld; Iris van der Heide; Tomas Rejda; Peter L J van Veldhoven; Sietske van Berkel; Aernout Snoek; Wim van Harten; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Angela G E M de Boer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: M A Greidanus; A G E M de Boer; C M Tiedtke; M H W Frings-Dresen; A E de Rijk; S J Tamminga Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Grace L Smith; Shuangshuang Fu; Matthew S Ning; Diem-Khanh Nguyen; Paul M Busse; Robert L Foote; Adam S Garden; Gary B Gunn; Clifton D Fuller; William H Morrison; Gregory M Chronowski; Shalin J Shah; Lauren L Mayo; Jack Phan; Jay P Reddy; James W Snider; Samir H Patel; Sanford R Katz; Alexander Lin; Nasiruddin Mohammed; Roi Dagan; Nancy Y Lee; David I Rosenthal; Steven J Frank Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2021-06-25