Literature DB >> 2509016

Bone radiogrametry: caliper versus magnifying glass.

H Rico1, E R Hernandez.   

Abstract

Radiogrametry was done on 100 hands by two observers using two methods: (1) caliper and (2) magnifying glass measurement. At the mid-point of the second metacarpal, the total width (D) and medullary width (d) were measured and cortical thickness (C) was calculated from the difference (D-d). Statistical analysis disclosed that the intra-observer CV is smaller for both observers using the magnifying glass than with the caliper (1.9 and 2.1% vs. 2.8 and 4.3%, respectively). The inter-observer CV is also less with the magnifying glass (4.2 and 5.7% vs. 6.2 and 6.9%, respectively). Although measurements made with each method correlate significantly, the values (mean +/- SD) obtained in isolated measurements using each method differ significantly, with C for both observers, as well as the intra-observer coefficient of variation (CV), being smaller. These results, which demonstrated different bone mass values as quantitated using a caliper or magnifying glass, indicate the greater reliability and precision of the latter method.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2509016     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  16 in total

1.  The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach.

Authors:  E BARNETT; B E NORDIN
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  The measurement of sequential changes in cortical bone geometry.

Authors:  A Horsman; M Simpson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Inter-observer and intra-observer variation in bone histomorphometry.

Authors:  J E Compston; S Vedi; A J Stellon
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Long-term influence of levodopa on bone mass and growth hormone in postmenopausal women with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  H Rico; A Vazquez; J A Cabranes; L Cantizano; E R Hernandez; I Krisnik; E Varela de Seijas
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.592

5.  [Parameters of bone mass in the normal Spanish population].

Authors:  H Rico Lenza; A Del Rio Vazquez; C Lozano Tonkin; R Ciguenza Gabriel; D Espinos Pérez
Journal:  Rev Clin Esp       Date:  1978-03-15       Impact factor: 1.556

6.  Identifying postmenopausal patients at risk of significant bone loss.

Authors:  J W Orchard; S E Evers; R G Haddad
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Longitudinal microradioscopic comparisons on endosteal and juxtaendosteal bone loss in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and in those with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  H E Meema; S Meema
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Decline in skin collagen content and metacarpal index after the menopause and its prevention with sex hormone replacement.

Authors:  M Brincat; C F Moniz; S Kabalan; E Versi; T O'Dowd; A L Magos; J Montgomery; J W Studd
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1987-02

9.  Prevention of steroid-induced osteoporosis with (3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene)-1,1-bisphosphonate (APD).

Authors:  I R Reid; A R King; C J Alexander; H K Ibbertson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The role of growth hormone in the pathogenesis of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  H Rico; A Del Rio; T Vila; R Patiño; F Carrera; D Espinós
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1979-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Intra-uterine long bone growth in small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  J Palacios; S Rodríguez; J I Rodríguez
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Comparison between metacarpal bone measurements by computarized radiogrammetry and total body DEXA in normal and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; L F Villa; J F Martin-Santos; J L Cardenas; E Fraile
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Vertebral and metacarpal morphometry as indicators of nutritional improvement.

Authors:  M Revilla; E Fraile; F Aguado; E R Hermandez; L F Villa; H Rico
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Metacarpal bone mass in normal and osteoporotic Japanese women using computed X-ray densitometry.

Authors:  C Matsumoto; K Kushida; K Yamazaki; K Imose; T Inoue
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Automated computerized radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal and its correlation with absorptiometry of the forearm and spine.

Authors:  T Derisquebourg; P Dubois; J P Devogelaer; E Meys; B Duquesnoy; C Nagant de Deuxchaisnes; B Delcambre; X Marchandise
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  The measurement of osteoporosis in clinical practice.

Authors:  E R Hernandez; F Gomez-Castresana; L F Villa; H Rico
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.980

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.