Literature DB >> 6527156

Bone density in women: a modified procedure for measurement of distal radial density.

B J Awbrey, P C Jacobson, S A Grubb, W H McCartney, L M Vincent, R V Talmage.   

Abstract

This is a cross-sectional study of bone densitometry in greater than 700 normal healthy white women ranging in age from 18 to 98 years. A modified procedure for single-photon bone density analysis of the distal radius is described and compared with dual-photon densitometric measurements of the second through fourth lumbar vertebrae. The distal radial site measured was separated from the ulna by 5 mm. This "5 mm" site was characterized according to trabecular and cortical bone content, measurement reproducibility, positioning precision, and the effects of wrist pronation or supination. The radial site demonstrated a bone density loss of less than 0.1%/year for normal women 25-50 years of age, increasing to 0.7%/year after 50 years of age. In contrast to the variability and inconsistency obtained by us and others utilizing the standard "9/10" site, bone loss with age at the new "5 mm" site correlated closely with generalized bone mineral loss of the axial skeleton. We suggest that there is a unique role for single-beam densitometric measurements of the radius, permitting the rapid and relatively inexpensive evaluation of large populations of women without requiring a visit to a medical center. Such a process can select those requiring further evaluation or medical attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6527156     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100020402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  19 in total

1.  Are calcium intakes and physical activity patterns during adolescence related to radial bone mass of white college-age females?

Authors:  F A Tylavsky; J J Anderson; R V Talmage; T N Taft
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone density and lifestyle characteristics in premenopausal and postmenopausal Chinese women.

Authors:  J F Hu; X H Zhao; J S Chen; J Fitzpatrick; B Parpia; T C Campbell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Quantitative computed tomography: update 1987.

Authors:  H K Genant; P Steiger; J E Block; C C Glueer; B Ettinger; S T Harris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Bone density of the radius, spine, and hip in relation to percent of ideal body weight in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; C Shipp; L Sadowski; G Dallal
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Effects of salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a controlled double-blind clinical study.

Authors:  G F Mazzuoli; M Passeri; C Gennari; S Minisola; R Antonelli; C Valtorta; E Palummeri; G F Cervellin; S Gonnelli; G Francini
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Unequal decrease in bone density of lumbar spine and ultradistal radius in Colles' and vertebral fracture syndromes.

Authors:  R Eastell; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; P C Amadio; L J Melton; B L Riggs
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Familial resemblance of radial bone mass between premenopausal mothers and their college-age daughters.

Authors:  F A Tylavsky; A D Bortz; R L Hancock; J J Anderson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Positive relationship between bone mineral density and low back pain in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Takashi Manabe; Shin-ichiro Takasugi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Premenopausal bone loss: fact or artifact?

Authors:  B J Riis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.