Literature DB >> 27746028

Airborne Acoustic Perception by a Jumping Spider.

Paul S Shamble1, Gil Menda2, James R Golden3, Eyal I Nitzany4, Katherine Walden5, Tsevi Beatus6, Damian O Elias7, Itai Cohen6, Ronald N Miles8, Ronald R Hoy5.   

Abstract

Jumping spiders (Salticidae) are famous for their visually driven behaviors [1]. Here, however, we present behavioral and neurophysiological evidence that these animals also perceive and respond to airborne acoustic stimuli, even when the distance between the animal and the sound source is relatively large (∼3 m) and with stimulus amplitudes at the position of the spider of ∼65 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Behavioral experiments with the jumping spider Phidippus audax reveal that these animals respond to low-frequency sounds (80 Hz; 65 dB SPL) by freezing-a common anti-predatory behavior characteristic of an acoustic startle response. Neurophysiological recordings from auditory-sensitive neural units in the brains of these jumping spiders showed responses to low-frequency tones (80 Hz at ∼65 dB SPL)-recordings that also represent the first record of acoustically responsive neural units in the jumping spider brain. Responses persisted even when the distances between spider and stimulus source exceeded 3 m and under anechoic conditions. Thus, these spiders appear able to detect airborne sound at distances in the acoustic far-field region, beyond the near-field range often thought to bound acoustic perception in arthropods that lack tympanic ears (e.g., spiders) [2]. Furthermore, direct mechanical stimulation of hairs on the patella of the foreleg was sufficient to generate responses in neural units that also responded to airborne acoustic stimuli-evidence that these hairs likely play a role in the detection of acoustic cues. We suggest that these auditory responses enable the detection of predators and facilitate an acoustic startle response. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic startle response; acoustics; jumping spider; neuroethology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27746028      PMCID: PMC5102792          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  24 in total

1.  Efficient coding of natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Evolution and function of auditory systems in insects.

Authors:  A Stumpner; D von Helversen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2001-04

3.  Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering.

Authors:  R Quian Quiroga; Z Nadasdy; Y Ben-Shaul
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Air motion sensing hairs of arthropods detect high frequencies at near-maximal mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  Brice Bathellier; Thomas Steinmann; Friedrich G Barth; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Startle, categorical response, and attention in acoustic behavior of insects.

Authors:  R R Hoy
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Agonistic signals received by an arthropod filiform hair allude to the prevalence of near-field sound communication.

Authors:  Roger D Santer; Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Evolution of a sensory novelty: tympanic ears and the associated neural processing.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Surface force spectroscopic point load measurements and viscoelastic modelling of the micromechanical properties of air flow sensitive hairs of a spider (Cupiennius salei).

Authors:  Michael E McConney; Clemens F Schaber; Michael D Julian; William C Eberhardt; Joseph A C Humphrey; Friedrich G Barth; Vladimir V Tsukruk
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Active respiration rates for the burrowing wolf spider Geolycosa domifex (Hancock).

Authors:  D J McQueen
Journal:  Can J Zool       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 1.597

10.  Visual perception in the brain of a jumping spider.

Authors:  Gil Menda; Paul S Shamble; Eyal I Nitzany; James R Golden; Ronald R Hoy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sensing fluctuating airflow with spider silk.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Ronald N Miles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Neuroestrogens rapidly shape auditory circuits to support communication learning and perception: Evidence from songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel M Vahaba; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  Anthropogenic noise changes arthropod abundances.

Authors:  Jessie P Bunkley; Christopher J W McClure; Akito Y Kawahara; Clinton D Francis; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Sensory system plasticity in a visually specialized, nocturnal spider.

Authors:  Jay A Stafstrom; Peter Michalik; Eileen A Hebets
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Electric Fields Elicit Ballooning in Spiders.

Authors:  Erica L Morley; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them.

Authors:  Stefano Mammola; Peter Michalik; Eileen A Hebets; Marco Isaia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.