Literature DB >> 2508857

Sample size and power for comparing two or more treatment groups in clinical trials.

S J Day1, D F Graham.   

Abstract

Methods for determining sample size and power when comparing two groups in clinical trials are widely available. Studies comparing three or more treatments are not uncommon but are more difficult to analyse. A linear nomogram was devised to help calculate the sample size required when comparing up to five parallel groups. It may also be used retrospectively to determine the power of a study of given sample size. In two worked examples the nomogram was efficient. Although the nomogram offers only 5% and 1% significance levels and can be used only for up to five treatment groups, this is sufficient for most researchers.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2508857      PMCID: PMC1837599          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.299.6700.663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  9 in total

1.  Sample size determinants for r X c comparative trials.

Authors:  J M Lachin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Glycopyrronium requirements for antagonism of the muscarinic side effects of edrophonium.

Authors:  P Dodd; S J Day; D R Goldhill; D M MacLeod; P S Withington; P M Yate
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Cardiopulmonary response to dynamic exercise after heart and combined heart-lung transplantation.

Authors:  N R Banner; M H Lloyd; R D Hamilton; J A Innes; A Guz; M H Yacoub
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-03

4.  Graphical aid for determining power of clinical trials involving two groups.

Authors:  D K Miller; S M Homan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-10

5.  Effect of cisapride on morphine-induced delay in gastric emptying.

Authors:  D J Rowbotham; W S Nimmo
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  A method for the rapid determination of the number of patients to include in a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  C J Clark; C C Downie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1966-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical trial numbers and confidence intervals of pre-specified size.

Authors:  S J Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Confidence estimation and the size of a clinical trial.

Authors:  R B McHugh; C T Le
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1984-06

9.  Differential effects of the anxiolytic drugs, diazepam and buspirone, on memory function.

Authors:  I Lucki; K Rickels; M A Giesecke; A Geller
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.335

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part III. Overcoming operational challenges in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Elena Losina; James Wright; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Efficacy of systemic and intratympanic corticosteroid combination therapy versus intratympanic or systemic therapy in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohammadtaghi Khorsandi Ashtiani; Farzad Firouzi; Shahin Bastaninejad; Sasan Dabiri; Sevil Nasirmohtaram; Niloufar Saeedi; Hossein Ghazavi; Leyla Sahebi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Opioid-induced Respiratory Depression Is Only Partially Mediated by the preBötzinger Complex in Young and Adult Rabbits In Vivo.

Authors:  Astrid G Stucke; Justin R Miller; Ivana Prkic; Edward J Zuperku; Francis A Hopp; Eckehard A E Stuth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Randomised controlled factorial trial of dietary advice for patients with a single high blood pressure reading in primary care.

Authors:  Paul Little; Jo Kelly; Jane Barnett; Martina Dorward; Barrie Margetts; Daniel Warm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-13

5.  Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Little; S Griffin; J Kelly; N Dickson; C Sadler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27

Review 6.  Systematic reviews in paediatric multiple sclerosis and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease exemplify shortcomings in methods used to evaluate therapies in rare conditions.

Authors:  Steffen Unkel; Christian Röver; Nigel Stallard; Norbert Benda; Martin Posch; Sarah Zohar; Tim Friede
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Randomised controlled trial of Alexander technique lessons, exercise, and massage (ATEAM) for chronic and recurrent back pain.

Authors:  Paul Little; George Lewith; Fran Webley; Maggie Evans; Angela Beattie; Karen Middleton; Jane Barnett; Kathleen Ballard; Frances Oxford; Peter Smith; Lucy Yardley; Sandra Hollinghurst; Debbie Sharp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-08-19

8.  A pilot study of respiratory muscle training to improve cough effectiveness and reduce the incidence of pneumonia in acute stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stefan Tino Kulnik; Gerrard Francis Rafferty; Surinder S Birring; John Moxham; Lalit Kalra
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.