Keren Yizhak1, Sylvia E Le Dévédec2, Vasiliki Maria Rogkoti2, Franziska Baenke3, Vincent C de Boer4, Christian Frezza5, Almut Schulze3, Bob van de Water2, Eytan Ruppin6. 1. The Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel kerenyiz@post.tau.ac.il ruppin@post.tau.ac.il. 2. Division of Toxicology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Gene Expression Analysis Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, London, UK. 4. Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 6. The Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel kerenyiz@post.tau.ac.il ruppin@post.tau.ac.il.
Abstract
Over the last decade, the field of cancer metabolism has mainly focused on studying the role of tumorigenic metabolic rewiring in supporting cancer proliferation. Here, we perform the first genome-scale computational study of the metabolic underpinnings of cancer migration. We build genome-scale metabolic models of the NCI-60 cell lines that capture the Warburg effect (aerobic glycolysis) typically occurring in cancer cells. The extent of the Warburg effect in each of these cell line models is quantified by the ratio of glycolytic to oxidative ATP flux (AFR), which is found to be highly positively associated with cancer cell migration. We hence predicted that targeting genes that mitigate the Warburg effect by reducing the AFR may specifically inhibit cancer migration. By testing the anti-migratory effects of silencing such 17 top predicted genes in four breast and lung cancer cell lines, we find that up to 13 of these novel predictions significantly attenuate cell migration either in all or one cell line only, while having almost no effect on cell proliferation. Furthermore, in accordance with the predictions, a significant reduction is observed in the ratio between experimentally measured ECAR and OCR levels following these perturbations. Inhibiting anti-migratory targets is a promising future avenue in treating cancer since it may decrease cytotoxic-related side effects that plague current anti-proliferative treatments. Furthermore, it may reduce cytotoxic-related clonal selection of more aggressive cancer cells and the likelihood of emerging resistance.
Over the last decade, the field of cancer metabolism has mainly focused on studying the role of tumorigenic metabolic rewiring in supporting cancer proliferation. Here, we perform the first genome-scale computational study of the metabolic underpinnings of cancer migration. We build genome-scale metabolic models of the NCI-60 cell lines that capture the Warburg effect (aerobic glycolysis) typically occurring in cancer cells. The extent of the Warburg effect in each of these cell line models is quantified by the ratio of glycolytic to oxidative ATP flux (AFR), which is found to be highly positively associated with cancer cell migration. We hence predicted that targeting genes that mitigate the Warburg effect by reducing the AFR may specifically inhibit cancer migration. By testing the anti-migratory effects of silencing such 17 top predicted genes in four breast and lung cancer cell lines, we find that up to 13 of these novel predictions significantly attenuate cell migration either in all or one cell line only, while having almost no effect on cell proliferation. Furthermore, in accordance with the predictions, a significant reduction is observed in the ratio between experimentally measured ECAR and OCR levels following these perturbations. Inhibiting anti-migratory targets is a promising future avenue in treating cancer since it may decrease cytotoxic-related side effects that plague current anti-proliferative treatments. Furthermore, it may reduce cytotoxic-related clonal selection of more aggressive cancer cells and the likelihood of emerging resistance.
Altered tumor metabolism has become a generally regarded hallmark of cancer (Hanahan &
Weinberg, 2011). The initial recognition that metabolism is
altered in cancer can be traced back to Otto Warburg's early studies, showing that
transformed cells consume glucose at an abnormally high rate and largely reduce it to lactate, even
in the presence of oxygen (Warburg, 1956). Over the last
decade, much of the field of cancer metabolism has focused on the role of the Warburg effect in
supporting cancer proliferation (Vander Heiden et al, 2009). However, the role of this process in supporting other fundamental cancer
phenotypes such as cellular migration has received far less attention.Contemporary cytotoxic cancer treatment has been mainly based on drugs that kill proliferating
cells generally unselectively and are therefore accompanied by many undesirable side effects. Drug
targets that can inhibit migration but leave cellular proliferation relatively spared may be able to
avoid such side effects. Such targets may have the additional benefit of reducing the selection for
more resistant clones that occurs due to the elimination of treatment-sensitive cells. The growing
availability of high-throughput measurements for a range of cancer cells presents an opportunity to
study a wider scope of dysregulated metabolism across many different cancers. Here, we aim to
integrate pertaining data with a genome-scale mechanistic model of human metabolism to study the
role of the Warburg effect in tumor progression and its potential association with cellular
migration.Genome-scale metabolic modeling is an increasingly widely used computational framework for
studying metabolism. Given the genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) of a species alongside contextual
information such as growth media and ‘omics’ data, one can obtain a fairly accurate
prediction of numerous metabolic phenotypes, including growth rates, nutrient uptake rates, gene
essentiality, and more (Covert et al, 2004).
GSMMs have been used for various applications (Oberhardt et al, 2009; Chandrasekaran & Price, 2010; Jensen & Papin, 2010; Szappanos
et al, 2011; Wessely et al,
2011; Lerman et al, 2012; Nogales et al, 2012;
Schuetz et al, 2012) including drug
discovery (Trawick & Schilling, 2006; Oberhardt
et al, 2013; Yizhak et al,
2013) and metabolic engineering (Burgard et
al, 2003; Pharkya et al, 2004). Over the last few years, GSMMs have been successfully used
for modeling human metabolism as well (Duarte et al, 2007; Ma et al, 2007;
Shlomi et al, 2008; Gille et
al, 2010; Lewis et al, 2010; Mardinoglu et al, 2013). Specifically, GSMM models of cancer cells have been reconstructed and
applied for predicting selective drug targets, as well as for studying the role of tumor suppressors
and oxidative stress (Folger et al, 2011;
Frezza et al, 2011; Agren et
al, 2012, 2014;
Jerby et al, 2012; Goldstein et
al, 2013; Gatto et al, 2014). In the context of studying the Warburg effect, the original
human metabolic model does not predict forced lactate secretion under maximal biomass production
rate, even when oxygen consumption rate equals zero. This renders it unsuitable for studying the
Warburg effect as is, as already noted by (Shlomi et al, 2011). While the addition of solvent capacity constraints has been shown to
overcome this hurdle in principle (Shlomi et al, 2011), this addition requires enzymatic kinetic data which are still largely absent on a
genome-scale.In this study, we utilize individual genome-scale metabolic models tailored separately to each of
the NCI-60 cancer cell lines to study the role of the Warburg effect in supporting cancer cellular
migratory capacity. We first test and validate the individual models against both existing and novel
bioenergetic experimental data. Then, we examine the extent of the Warburg effect occurring in a
given cancer cell line, by quantifying the glycolytic to oxidative ATP flux ratio (AFR). We find
that the AFR is highly positively correlated with cancer cell migration, emphasizing the role of
glycolytic flux in supporting the more aggressive metastatic stages of tumor development. To
determine whether a causal relation exists between AFR levels and cell migration, we predict gene
silencing that reduce this ratio. These potential targets are then filtered further to exclude those
predicted to result in cell lethality. Reassuringly, the predicted targets are found to be
significantly more highly expressed in metastatic and high-grade breast cancer tumors. Experimental
investigation of the top predicted targets via siRNA-mediated knockdown shows that a significant
portion of them truly attenuate cancer cell migration without inducing a lethal effect. Furthermore,
in accordance with the predictions, a significant reduction is observed in the ratio between ECAR
and OCR levels following these genes silencing perturbations.
Results
Stoichiometric and flux capacity constraints successfully capture the coupling of high cell
proliferation rate to lactate secretion across individual NCI-60 cancer models
As a starting point for this study, we developed a set of metabolic models specific for each of
the NCI-60 cell lines. We built these models using a new algorithm we have recently developed termed
PRIME, for building individual models of cells from pertaining omics data (Yizhak et
al, submitted, Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig S1). PRIME uses the generic human model as a scaffold and sets
maximal flux capacity constraints over a subset of its growth-associated reactions according to the
expression levels of their corresponding catalyzing enzymes in each of the target cell lines.An important hallmark of cancerous cells is the production of lactate through the Warburg effect
(Warburg, 1956). As a first step in validating the basic
function of our NCI-60 models, we assessed whether maximizing biomass forces production of lactate,
which would signify proper coupling of biomass production with lactate output as seen in cancer
cells. We found that the models indeed must secrete lactate under biomass maximization
(Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig
S2). Hence, in contrast to the original generic model of human metabolism, they enable us to
systematically assess the extent of lactate secretion and study the Warburg effect across a wide
range of cancer cell lines without needing to add (mostly unknown) solvent capacity constraints,
thus identifying its functional correlates on a genome scale.
Comparing predicted versus experimentally measured bioenergetics capacity
We compared the predicted lactate secretion rates across all cell lines to those measured
experimentally by Jain et al (Jain et al, 2012), obtaining a moderate but significant correlation (Spearman correlation
R = 0.36, P-value = 5.7e−3, Fig 1A, Materials and Methods). To further test the models'
performance under different environmental conditions, we measured lactate secretion rates in four
breast cancer cell lines, T47D, MCF7, BT549, and Hs578T (Supplementary Dataset S1), under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions (see
Materials and Methods). Utilizing the corresponding cell line models from the NCI-60 set, we found a
high correlation between measured and predicted lactate secretion levels across both conditions
(Spearman correlation R = 0.95, P-value =
1.1e−3, Fig 1B).
Figure 1
A comparison between experimental and predicted in silico measurements of
lactate secretion (or ECAR) and OCR across different cancer cell lines
Measured versus predicted lactate secretion rates across the 59 cell lines available at Jain
et al (2012).
Measured versus predicted lactate secretion rates in hypoxic (red) and normoxic (blue) conditions
for four breast cancer cell lines: T47D, MCF7, BT549, and Hs578T. Bars represent the measured
lactate secretion rates and the line represents the corresponding predicted rates. Error bars
represent SD; number of samples for experimental data (bars) is n = 7;
number of samples for predicted data (line) is n = 1000.
Predicted ECAR and OCR by the A549 and H460 cell line models following inhibitory perturbations
in the glycolytic pathway. The models predictions show a decrease in ECAR (red line) and an increase
in OCR (blue line). As found experimentally, the predicted OCR increase in H460 cells is lower than
that found for A549 cells. The x-axes represent the level of inhibition imposed,
starting from a zero to a maximal inhibition (Materials and Methods). The specific perturbations
include 3BpRA that inhibits the enzyme hexokinase 2; Iodoacetate that inhibits the enzyme
glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Fluoride that inhibits the enzyme enolase; and Oxamate that
inhibits the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase.
A comparison between experimental and predicted in silico measurements of
lactate secretion (or ECAR) and OCR across different cancer cell lines
Measured versus predicted lactate secretion rates across the 59 cell lines available at Jain
et al (2012).Measured versus predicted lactate secretion rates in hypoxic (red) and normoxic (blue) conditions
for four breast cancer cell lines: T47D, MCF7, BT549, and Hs578T. Bars represent the measured
lactate secretion rates and the line represents the corresponding predicted rates. Error bars
represent SD; number of samples for experimental data (bars) is n = 7;
number of samples for predicted data (line) is n = 1000.Predicted ECAR and OCR by the A549 and H460 cell line models following inhibitory perturbations
in the glycolytic pathway. The models predictions show a decrease in ECAR (red line) and an increase
in OCR (blue line). As found experimentally, the predicted OCR increase in H460 cells is lower than
that found for A549 cells. The x-axes represent the level of inhibition imposed,
starting from a zero to a maximal inhibition (Materials and Methods). The specific perturbations
include 3BpRA that inhibits the enzyme hexokinase 2; Iodoacetate that inhibits the enzyme
glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Fluoride that inhibits the enzyme enolase; and Oxamate that
inhibits the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase.The ratio of glycolytic versus oxidative capacity in a cell can be quantified using its
extracellular acidification rate (ECAR, a proxy of lactate secretion) and its oxygen consumption
rate (OCR). To further examine how well our cell line models capture measured Warburg-related
activity in response to genetic perturbations, we utilized measured ECAR and OCR levels in response
to perturbations in two NCI-60 lung cancer cell lines (A549 and H460), and compared the results to
predictions from our models (Materials and Methods) (Wu et al, 2007). Qualitatively similar ECAR and OCR changes are found in
response to various enzymatic perturbations along the glycolytic pathway. Specifically, increased
glycolytic inhibition resulted in reduced ECAR and elevated OCR levels in both cells, while the
maximum cellular respiration increase in H460 cells observed after all glycolysis inhibitors was
lower than the corresponding increase in A549 cells (Fig 1C).
Quantifying the Warburg effect and its relation to proliferation and migration across the
NCI-60 cell lines
While ECAR and OCR are the commonly used measures for experimentally quantifying the bioenergetic
capacity of the cell and thus the Warburg effect, the genome-wide scope of GSMMs enables us to
examine other putative measures as well. One promising such measure we examined is the ratio between
the ATP flux rate in the glycolysis versus its flux rate in OXPHOS (AFR). Clearly, higher AFR values
denote more ‘Warburgian’ cell lines and vice versa. A comparison of our new AFR metric
versus the aforementioned state-of-the-art ECAR/OCR ratio (EOR) (Materials and Methods and Supplementary Dataset S3) showed a significant
correlation across the NCI-60 models (Spearman correlation R = 0.66,
P-value = 2e−8). Testing both measures using a genome-wide NCI-60
drug response dataset (Scherf et al, 2000),
we find that the model-predicted wild-type AFR levels across all cell line models are significantly
correlated (Spearman P-value < 0.05; FDR corrected with α =
0.05) with Gi50 values of 30% of the compounds across these cell lines (empiric
P-value < 9.9e−4), whereas the model-predicted EOR measure accomplish
this task for only 19% of the compounds (Materials and Methods). Interestingly, we find that
out of the 30% AFR-Gi50-correlated compounds, 97% are positively correlated,
suggesting that the more ‘Warburgian’ cell lines are less responsive and therefore
require higher dosage of compound to suppress their growth. The effect of most of these compounds is
also negatively correlated with the cells' growth rates, suggesting that slowly proliferating
cells are more resistant to treatment (similar results were previously shown for compounds targeting
cell growth (Penault-Llorca et al, 2009;
Vincent-Salomon et al, 2004)).
Interestingly, the response to many compounds in this dataset shows a significant association with
the AFR measure while having no association with the cells' growth rate. 133 such compounds
were identified (Supplementary Dataset S4),
possibly suggesting that their mechanism might be related to the Warburg level of the cells rather
than to their proliferation. Finally, predicted AFR values correctly separate between epithelial and
mesenchymal breast cancer cell lines (with the more aggressive mesenchymal cell lines exhibiting
larger Warburg effect (Sarrio et al, 2008),
Fig 2A). Once again, the AFR was more predictive of this
experimental observation than the EOR (Supplementary Dataset S3).
Figure 2
Association between AFR levels and cell proliferation and migration
The 20 cell lines that are predicted to exhibit the Warburg effect to the greatest/least extent
according to the AFR measure. The x-axis and y-axis represent the
mean and SD of the normalized ATP flux rate in glycolysis and OXPHOS, respectively (Materials and
Methods). The AFR measure correctly separates between mesenchymal (orange) and epithelial cell lines
(green), showing that the former (which are known to be more aggressive) have higher AFR levels.
We analyzed a panel of six breast cancer cell lines for their migration capacity using live cell
imaging. Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) images of the six cell lines in the order of their
respective migration speed (from low to high), scale bar is 100 μm (Materials and
Methods).
The average migration speed of cells followed for 12 h in complete medium. Error bars represent
SEM; the number of samples is between n = 100 and n
= 200.
The correlation of predicted model-based EOR and AFR measures to growth and migration rates
measured experimentally. Both measures represent a negative correlation with growth and a positive
correlation with migration rates. Significant results (P-value < 0.05) are
marked with an asterisk.
Association between AFR levels and cell proliferation and migration
The 20 cell lines that are predicted to exhibit the Warburg effect to the greatest/least extent
according to the AFR measure. The x-axis and y-axis represent the
mean and SD of the normalized ATP flux rate in glycolysis and OXPHOS, respectively (Materials and
Methods). The AFR measure correctly separates between mesenchymal (orange) and epithelial cell lines
(green), showing that the former (which are known to be more aggressive) have higher AFR levels.We analyzed a panel of six breast cancer cell lines for their migration capacity using live cell
imaging. Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) images of the six cell lines in the order of their
respective migration speed (from low to high), scale bar is 100 μm (Materials and
Methods).The average migration speed of cells followed for 12 h in complete medium. Error bars represent
SEM; the number of samples is between n = 100 and n
= 200.The correlation of predicted model-based EOR and AFR measures to growth and migration rates
measured experimentally. Both measures represent a negative correlation with growth and a positive
correlation with migration rates. Significant results (P-value < 0.05) are
marked with an asterisk.We next turned to our primary objective of examining the relation between the Warburg effect and
tumor proliferation and migration. To this end, we experimentally measured the migration speed of
six NCI-60 breast cancer cell lines (Fig 2B and C, Materials
and Methods, Supplementary Fig S3, and
Supplementary Dataset S3) and utilized
publically available measured growth rates for these cell lines. While the AFR correlates markedly
negatively with cell growth rate (Spearman correlation of R = −0.55,
P-value = 4.53e−6, Fig 2D and
Supplementary Table S1), it correlates even
more strongly in the positive direction with cancer cell migration (Spearman correlation of
R = 0.88, P-value = 0.03, Fig 2D and Supplementary Table
S1). Controlling for the cell lines' measured growth rates, this correlation becomes
even more significant (partial Spearman correlation of R = 0.96,
P-value = 7e−3, Supplementary Table S1). Overall, this finding suggests that glycolytic flux correlates with
migration rather than with growth, while OXPHOS flux exhibits the opposite behavior. A similar
association between lactate secretion and growth rate has been recently found in an experimental
study by Jain et al (Jain et al, 2012) across the entire NCI-60 collection (Spearman correlation of R
= −0.22, P = 0.09). Furthermore, previous studies have shown
that high concentrations of lactate correlate with a high incidence of distant metastasis
(Hirschhaeuser et al, 2011). The overall
picture portrayed by these correlations is that while glycolytic carbon diverted to biosynthetic
pathways may support cell proliferation, non-diverted glycolytic carbon supports cell migration and
metastasis (Supplementary Fig S4).
Predicting drug targets that revert the AFR and hence may inhibit cancer migration
The congruence between AFR levels and disease severity led us to ask if we could build upon this
association to identify potential new drug targets. We searched for drug targets predicted to reduce
the AFR ratio by simulating the knockout of each metabolic reaction across the NCI-60 models, and
examining the effects of the knock-outs on biomass production, lactate secretion, and the AFR. As
lactate secretion is a basic indicator of the Warburg effect, we first identified a set of 113
reactions whose knockout is predicted to abolish lactate secretion rate in all cancer cell lines
under biomass maximization. Interestingly, the set of enzymes catalyzing these reactions is
significantly more highly expressed in the NCI-60 cell lines than the background metabolic genes
(one-sided Wilcoxon P-value < 1.6e−8), indicating the potential
oncogenic nature of these genes.To avoid selecting for drug-resistant clones it would be advantageous to develop drugs that
reduce the virulence of cancer cells but avoid killing them. The knockout of 12 of 113
lactate-reducing reactions reduces the AFR but relatively spares biomass production (Materials and
Methods and Supplementary Table S2).
Importantly, the knockout of these 12 reactions according to models of healthy lymphoblast cells
built by PRIME (Choy et al, 2008) also spares
their biomass production (Materials and Methods). Moreover, we found that none of the lymphoblast
cell lines show the forced lactate secretion that is observed in cancer cells. While the Warburg
effect is sometimes referred in the literature as occurring in highly proliferating cells in
general, our analysis finds that this phenomenon is apparently more prominent in cancer cells, at
least with regard to the lymphoblastoid cell population studied here.The final list of predicted gene targets includes 17 metabolic enzymes that are associated with
the final 12 reactions, spanning glycolysis, serine, and methionine metabolism (Fig 3A). 10 of the predicted targets have significantly higher
expression levels in metastatic versus non-metastatic breast cancer patients (Chang et
al, 2005) (one-sided Wilcoxon
P-value < 0.05, Fig 3B). Moreover, 9
of the predicted targets exhibit higher expression levels in grade 3 tumors than in grade 1 tumors
(Miller et al, 2005) (one-sided Wilcoxon
P-value < 0.05, Fig 3C). Finally,
lower expression of nine of the predicted targets is significantly associated with improved
long-term survival (Curtis et al, 2012)
(log-rank P-value < 0.05, Fig 3D),
testifying for their potential role as therapeutic targets. All P-values are
corrected for multiple hypothesis using FDR with α = 0.05.
Figure 3
Gene targets that are predicted to reduce the AFR and their association with prognostic
markers of breast cancer patients
A schematic representation of the 12 predicted gene targets, marked in red.
Ten predicted targets that show a significantly higher expression in metastatic versus
non-metastatic tumor samples (n = 295).
Nine predicted targets that show a significantly higher expression in grade 3 versus grade 1
tumor samples (n = 236).
Nine predicted targets whose lower expression is significantly associated with improved long-term
survival (n = 1568).
Gene targets that are predicted to reduce the AFR and their association with prognostic
markers of breast cancer patients
A schematic representation of the 12 predicted gene targets, marked in red.Ten predicted targets that show a significantly higher expression in metastatic versus
non-metastatic tumor samples (n = 295).Nine predicted targets that show a significantly higher expression in grade 3 versus grade 1
tumor samples (n = 236).Nine predicted targets whose lower expression is significantly associated with improved long-term
survival (n = 1568).
siRNA-mediated gene knockdown experiments testing the predicted targets
To experimentally test our predictions we silenced the 17 predicted AFR-reducing genes and
examined their phenotypic effects in the MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435, BT549, and A549 cell lines.
Knockdown experiments were performed with SmartPools from Dharmacon using a live cell migration and
fixed proliferation assays (Materials and Methods). 8–13 out of the 17 enzymes (8–10
out of 12 metabolic reactions) were found to significantly attenuate migration speed in each cell
line (two-sided t-test P-value < 0.05, FDR corrected with
α = 0.05, Fig 4, Materials and Methods and
Supplementary Dataset S5). This result is
highly significant as only 17% of the metabolic genes were found to impair cell migration in
a siRNA screen of 190 metabolic genes (Fokkelman M, Rogkoti VM et al, unpublished
data, Bernoulli P-value in the range of 3.9e−3 and 1.18e−7). Of note,
the association between the gene expression of the predicted targets and the measured migration
speed is insignificant for all targets but one, testifying for the inherent value of our model-based
prediction analysis (Supplementary Table
S3). It should also be noted that the knockdown of the three splices of the enolase gene have
almost no significant effect on these cells' migration speed, possibly because of isoenzymes
backup mechanisms. Importantly, most of the gene knockdown experiments do not manifest any
significant effects on cell proliferation (Fig 4). In
accordance with the findings of Simpson et al (Simpson et al,
2008), we found that the correlation between the reduction in
migration speed and reduction in proliferation rate is mostly insignificant (Supplementary Dataset S5), suggesting that the
reduced migration observed is not simply a consequence of common mechanisms hindering proliferation,
but rather that it occurs due to the disruption of distinct migratory-associated metabolic
pathways.
Figure 4
Normalized to control mean speed per SmartPool gene silencing of the predicted
targets
A–D The four different cell lines that were analyzed: MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435s, BT549, and
A549. Significant results (two-sided t-test, P-value < 0.05
after correcting for multiple hypothesis using FDR with α = 0.05) are marked with an
asterisk. Two different controls are used: (1) non-targeting siRNA (= negative control); and
(2) a positive control DNM2 which is known to block both migration and proliferation (Ezratty
et al, 2005). Left panel shows migration
speed and right panel shows nuclear count. Error bars represent SD; the number of samples is
n = 3.
Normalized to control mean speed per SmartPool gene silencing of the predicted
targets
A–D The four different cell lines that were analyzed: MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-435s, BT549, and
A549. Significant results (two-sided t-test, P-value < 0.05
after correcting for multiple hypothesis using FDR with α = 0.05) are marked with an
asterisk. Two different controls are used: (1) non-targeting siRNA (= negative control); and
(2) a positive control DNM2 which is known to block both migration and proliferation (Ezratty
et al, 2005). Left panel shows migration
speed and right panel shows nuclear count. Error bars represent SD; the number of samples is
n = 3.
ECAR and OCR levels following selected gene silencing
To further study the association between reduced AFR levels and impaired cell migration we used
the Seahorse XF96 extracellular flux analyzer to measure both ECAR and OCR fluxes in the MDA-MB-231
cell line, following knockdown of a selected group of targets (Materials and Methods and Supplementary Fig S6). As the AFR measure is very
difficult to measure experimentally, we tested the conventionally measured EOR (ECAR/OCR) as its
proxy. We focused on a subset of seven genes (Fig 5) whose
knockdown is predicted to have the highest effect on cell migration and span all three predicted
metabolic pathways. As shown in Fig 5, a significant EOR
reduction versus the control is found for all seven examined genes (two-sided
t-test P-value < 0.05, FDR corrected with α =
0.05, Materials and Methods and Supplementary
Table S4). The silencing of the four glycolytic genes (HK2,
PGAM1, PGK2, and GAPDH) results in both decreased
ECAR and increased OCR levels, while the silencing of the serine- and methionine-associated genes
(PSPH, AHCY, and PHGDH) results with decreased
ECAR solely (Fig 5A). Furthermore, a matching significant
difference in experimentally measured EOR levels is found between the lowest and highest
AFR-reducing genes (one-sided Wilcoxon P-value = 0.05). Overall, taken
together our results testify that, as predicted, the knockdown of the top-ranked genes results in
attenuated cell migration that is accompanied by reduced EOR and AFR levels.
Figure 5
ECAR and OCR levels of top predicted gene targets
Mean and SEM (normalized to nuclear count) ECAR and OCR levels after silencing of seven different
genes (HK2, PGAM1, PGK2, GAPDH,
PSPH, AHCY, and PHGDH) compared to the control.
Silencing of the four glycolytic genes results in both a decrease in ECAR levels
(x-axis) and an increase in OCR levels (y-axis), while the serine-
and methionine-associated genes show only a decrease in ECAR levels. Error bars represent SEM. The
number of samples is n = 18.
Mean and SD of computed ECAR/OCR (EOR) levels for control and selected gene silencing (Materials
and Methods). For all genes a significant reduction in EOR levels is observed. Error bars represent
SD. The number of samples is n = 18.
ECAR and OCR levels of top predicted gene targets
Mean and SEM (normalized to nuclear count) ECAR and OCR levels after silencing of seven different
genes (HK2, PGAM1, PGK2, GAPDH,
PSPH, AHCY, and PHGDH) compared to the control.
Silencing of the four glycolytic genes results in both a decrease in ECAR levels
(x-axis) and an increase in OCR levels (y-axis), while the serine-
and methionine-associated genes show only a decrease in ECAR levels. Error bars represent SEM. The
number of samples is n = 18.Mean and SD of computed ECAR/OCR (EOR) levels for control and selected gene silencing (Materials
and Methods). For all genes a significant reduction in EOR levels is observed. Error bars represent
SD. The number of samples is n = 18.
Discussion
In this study we explored the role of the Warburg effect in supporting tumor migration, going
beyond recent investigations focusing on its role in assisting cancer proliferation. A model-based
investigation across cancer cell lines shows that the ratio between glycolytic and oxidative ATP
flux rate is significantly associated with cancer migratory behavior. Gene silencing perturbations
predicted to reduce this ratio were indeed found to attenuate cell migration, and result with a
significant reduction in ECAR to OCR levels. Of note, our modeling approach relies on gene
expression differences between the cells and does not take into account specific uptake rates. It is
therefore more suited for capturing qualitative rather than exact quantitative differences between
the cells, as demonstrated throughout the paper. Moreover, the lion share of our analysis is focused
on the simulations of perturbations where specific uptake rates are not available. Nonetheless,
utilizing such uptake measurements can significantly increase the correlation to the measured
lactate rates (Spearman correlation R = 0.67, P-value
= 1.5e−8), suggesting that uptake rates measurements under perturbation states can
significantly increase the models' prediction power.Our AFR measure is conceptually analogous to a bioenergetic (BEC) index previously introduced by
Cuezva et al (Cuezva et al, 2002). In that study, the ratio between the expression of the glycolytic enzyme
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and the β-catalytic subunit of ATP synthase
forming the BEC index was found to have a prognostic value in assessing the clinical outcome of
patients with early-stage colorectal carcinomas. The AFR measure and the BEC index (as computed by
its corresponding RNA levels) are significantly correlated (Spearman R =
0.58, P-value = 1.6e−6) across the NCI-60 cell lines, and the BEC
index is perfectly correlated with migration speed across the six breast cancer cell lines (Spearman
R = 1, P-value = 2.8e−3). However, the BEC
index has inferior performance in predicting drug response (Supplementary Table S1).The finding that enhanced glycolytic activity plays a key role in cancer cell migration is also
in line with a very recent study by De Bock et al, showing that glycolysis is the
major source of ATP production in endothelial cells and that the silencing of the glycolytic
regulator PFKFB3 impairs the cell migration capacity and interferes with vessel sprouting (De Bock
et al, 2013). In addition, silencing of
PFKFB3 was shown to suppress cell proliferation in about 50% (De Bock et al,
2013). Overall, the results presented in this study, as well
as findings reported by others (Simpson et al, 2008), suggest that proliferation and migration are not mutually exclusive, and the effect
of potential targets on both processes should be carefully examined.Some of our predicted targets have been previously studied in the context of cell proliferation
as well (Cheong et al, 2012). Possemato
et al (Possemato et al, 2011) have showed that suppression of PHGDH in cell lines with elevated
PHGDH expression, but not in those without, inhibits cell proliferation. Accordingly, as
PHGDH is not amplified in the cell line MDA-MB-231 which was examined in both
studies, its suppression is indeed non-lethal. However, we show that its suppression significantly
attenuates cell migration, suggesting that metabolic enzymes can promote different cancerous
phenotypes in different cancer cells.Remarkably, analyzing the model-predicted flux rates has successfully uncovered a fundamental
association between the AFR and cancer migration, even given the relatively small set of cell lines
for which migration was measured. Our analysis has also revealed other potential associations
between individual fluxes and cell migration (Supplementary Fig S4). However, future studies measuring cellular migration data across a
much wider array of cell lines (of the order for which we already have proliferation data) are
needed to determine the actual significance of these potential leads. As this study has shown,
cellular proliferation and migration have distinct underlying metabolite correlates; understanding
the metabolic correlates that are strongly associated with cell migration may lead to new
anti-metastatic treatment opportunities. It is important to note, however, that while the inhibition
of migration alone might be a good strategy for avoiding the adverse side effects of cytotoxic
treatment, cell migration is a crucial process also in normal physiology, for instance, in immune
response and tissue repair (Förster et al, 1999; Ridley et al, 2003).
Therefore, future anti-migratory drugs may pose different drug selectivity challenges that should be
carefully addressed in the future studies. Irrespectively, they may result in lesser clonal
selection, and as a result, their usage may be accompanied with lesser rate of emergence of
drug-resistant clones.
Materials and Methods
Computational methods
Genome-scale metabolic modeling (GSSM)
A metabolic network consisting of m metabolites and n reactions
can be represented by a stoichiometric matrix S, where the entry
S represents the stoichiometric coefficient of
metabolite i in reaction j (Price et al, 2004). A CBM model imposes mass balance, directionality, and flux
capacity constraints on the space of possible fluxes in the metabolic network's reactions
through a set of linear equations:where v stands for the flux vector for all of the reactions in the model (i.e.
the flux distribution). The exchange of metabolites with the environment is
represented as a set of exchange (transport) reactions, enabling a pre-defined set
of metabolites to be either taken up or secreted from the growth media. The steady-state assumption
represented in equation (1) constrains the production
rate of each metabolite to be equal to its consumption rate. Enzymatic directionality and flux
capacity constraints define lower and upper bounds on the fluxes and are embedded in equation (2). In the following, flux vectors satisfying these
conditions will be referred to as feasible steady-state flux distributions. Gene knockouts are
simulated by constraining the flux through the corresponding metabolic reaction to zero. The biomass
function utilized here is taken from (Folger et al, 2011). The media simulated in all the analyses throughout the paper is the RPMI-1640 media
that was used to grow the cell lines experimentally (Lee et al, 2007; Choy et al, 2008).
Building cell-specific metabolic models and computing lactate secretion
Our method to reconstruct the NCI-60 cancer cell lines (see Supplementary Material, based on the yet
unpublished methods in Yizhak et al, submitted) required several key inputs: (a)
the generic human model (Duarte et al, 2007), (b) gene expression data for each cancer cell line from (Lee et al,
2007), and (c) growth rate measurements. The algorithm then
reconstructs a specific metabolic model for each sample by modifying the upper bounds of
growth-associated reactions in accordance with their gene expression (Note: the growth rates were
used only to determine which reactions should be used in constraining the models, in order to obtain
models that were as physiologically relevant as possible; they were not used to determine reaction
bounds). A similar procedure was used to reconstruct the lymphoblast metabolic models (Choy
et al, 2008) for comparison against normal
proliferating cells. A more detailed description is found in the Supplementary Material.Simulations of the Warburg effect include the examination of minimal lactate production rate
under different demands for biomass production, glucose, glutamine, and oxygen uptake rates (Supplementary Material). We examined the minimal
value of lactate secretion as it testifies whether or not the cell is enforced to secrete lactate
under a given condition (Supplementary Fig
S1). All the correlations reported in the paper are Spearman rank correlations and their
associated P-values are computed using the exact permutation distribution.
Calculating wild-type and perturbed lactate secretion rates and OCR levels
For simulating lactate secretion under normoxic conditions (when comparing to Jain et
al (Jain et al, 2012), Wu
et al (Wu et al, 2007) and
the breast cancer data collected in this paper), oxygen maximal uptake rate was set to the highest
value under which minimal lactate secretion is positive. Since metabolic models are designed to
maximize growth yield rather than growth rate, using an unlimited amount of oxygen in GSMM
simulations will result in a state where the minimal lactate secretion rate equals zero. However,
it's important to note that even under the limited oxygen levels simulated here, the generic
human model doesn't show lactate secretion (as opposed to the NCI-60 cancer cell line models
described above). For simulating the hypoxic conditions measured here for the breast cancer cell
lines, we lowered the oxygen maximal uptake rate by 50% of its normoxic state as described
above. Under each of these conditions, we sampled the solution space under maximal biomass yield and
obtained 1,000 feasible flux distributions (Bordel et al, 2010). The predicted lactate secretion rate is the average lactate secretion flux
over these samples. For emulating the perturbation experiments in Wu et al we
gradually lowered the bound of the corresponding compound target (from the maximal bound to 0) and
repeated the procedure described above for computing the ECAR (lactate secretion) and the OCR, which
in a similar manner is defined as the average oxygen consumption flux across all samples.
Calculating the EOR and AFR measures for assessing the Warburg level of the cell lines and
using them to predict drug response
The EOR and AFR measures were calculated in a similar manner to that described above.
Specifically, the EOR is calculated as the mean over lactate secretion across all samples divided by
the mean over oxygen consumption across all samples. Similarly, the AFR is calculated as the mean
flux carried by the reactions producing ATP in glycolysis versus the mean flux carried by the
reaction producing ATP in OXPHOS. To determine an empiric P-value in the drug
response analysis we randomly shuffled the drug response data 1,000 times, each time examining the
resulting Wilcoxon P-value over the original set of cell lines.
Predicting the effect of reaction knockouts
Each metabolic reaction in each cell line model is perturbed by constraining its flux to zero.
Under each perturbation the minimal lactate secretion (under maximal growth rate) and the maximal
growth rate is calculated. The set of reactions that eliminate forced lactate secretion while
maintaining a level of cell growth that is > 10% of the wild-type growth prediction is
further tested for the AFR level. The mean AFR level for each cell line under each of these
perturbations is calculated over 1,000 flux distribution samples as described above. The final set
of predicted reactions includes those whose knockout reduces the AFR to below 60% of its
wild-type level.
Datasets
Growth rate measurements and drug response data were downloaded from the NCI website.Growth rate: http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/docs/misc/common_files/cell_list.htmlDrug response: http://discover.nci.nih.gov/nature2000/natureintromain.jsp
Experimentally measuring lactate secretion rates of breast cancer cell lines
Cell Culture
The MCF7, T47D, Hs578T and BT549 breast cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection and London Research Institute Cell Services. Cells were cultured in DMEM/F12
(1:1), with 2 mM L-glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin. Medium was supplemented with 10%
FCS (GIBCO) for the cancer cell lines and 5% horse serum, 20 ng/ml EGF, 5 μg/ml
hydrocortisone, 10 μg/ml insulin, and 100 ng/ml cholera toxin for the non-malignant cell
lines.
Lactate secretion measurements
Cells were cultured under normoxic (20% O2) and hypoxic (0.5%
O2) conditions for 72 h. Cells were starved of glucose and glutamine for 1 h and full
medium was added for 1 h. Lactate secretion was determined from normoxic and hypoxic cells and
normalized to cell growth (increase in total protein during the 72 h incubation in normoxia).
Lactate concentrations in media incubated with or without cells were determined using lactate assay
kits (BioVision). Total protein content determined by Sulforhodamine B assay was used for
normalization. Two experiments were performed with three or four biologically independent replicates
(total of seven replicates).
Cell culture for live cell imaging and cell migration assays
T47D, MCF-7, MDA-MB-435, BT549, MDA-MB-231 and Hs578t were cultured in RPMI (GIBCO, Life
Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (PAA, Pashing Austria) and 100
International Units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA,
USA).
Gene silencing
Human siRNA SmartPools (a combination of four individual singles) for the 17 predicted genes were
purchased in siGENOME format from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA). Plates were diluted to 1 μM
working concentration in complementary 1× siRNA buffer in a 96-well plate format. A
non-targeting siRNA was used as negative control. A 50 nM reverse transfection was performed
according to manufacturer's guidelines. Complex time was 20 min and 5,000 cells were added.
The plate was placed in the incubator overnight and the medium was refreshed the following morning.
After 48–72 h cells were used for various assays. Cell migration and metabolic flux assay
experiments were performed in duplicate while the cell proliferation assay was performed in
triplicate.
Live cell imaging random cell migration assay
Glass bottom 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-one, Monroe, NC, USA) were coated with 20
μg/μl collagen type I (isolated from rat tails) for 1 h at 37°C. 48 h after
silencing, the MDA-MB-231 cells were re-plated onto the collagen-coated glass bottom plate. 24 h
after seeding, cells were pre-exposed for 45 min to 0.1 μg/µl Hoechst 33342 (Fisher
Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA) to visualize nuclei. After refreshing the medium, cells were placed on
a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-E microscope fitted with a 37°C incubation chamber, 20×
objective (0.75 NA, 1.00 WD) automated stage and perfect focus system. Three positions per well were
automatically defined, and the Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) and Hoechst signals were
acquired with a CCD camera (Pixel size: 0.64 μm) every 20 min for a total imaging period of
12 h using NIS software (Nikon). All data were converted and analyzed using custom-made ImagePro
Plus macros (Roosmalen et al, 2011). Cell
migration was quantified by tracking nuclei in time. Changes in migration speed per knockdown were
evaluated via a two-sided t-test comparing the speed for every individual cell
followed overtime for 16 h and the corresponding control values. Data shown are normalized to
control and represent only one replicate. Of note, for all four cell lines both replicates showed a
R2 of reproducibility above 0.75. Genes achieving
P-value < 0.05 after correcting for multiple hypothesis using FDR with
α = 0.05 are considered as hits.
Proliferation assay
Cells were directly transfected and plated onto micro-clear 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-one).
After 5 days of incubation, the cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 and fixed with TCA
(Trichloroacetic acid) allowing both a nuclear counting and/or Sulforodamine B (SRB) readout. Whole
wells were imaged using epi-fluorescence and the number of nuclei was determined using a custom-made
ImagePro macro. Plates were further processed for SRB staining as described earlier (Zhang
et al, 2011). SRB data showed a complete
overlap with the nuclear count so this measure is used in all figures. Changes in proliferation
rates upon knockdown when compared to control were evaluated in triplicate via a two-sided
t-test. The mean proliferation rate after knockdown between all three replicates
was calculated and normalized to the non-targeting siRNA (= control). Genes achieving
P-value < 0.05 after correcting for multiple hypothesis using FDR with
α = 0.05 are considered as hits.
Metabolic flux assay
The bioenergetics flux of cells in response to gene silencing was assessed using the Seahorse
XF96 extracellular flux analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience). About 8,000 MDA-MB-231 cells per well
(Seahorse plate) were treated with siRNAs or control for 72 h. Each gene (in total 7) was knockdown
in six different wells and the experiment was performed twice (so a total of six replicates per
plate and two plates). Prior to measurement, the medium was replaced with unbuffered DMEM XF assay
medium. The basal oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were
then determined using the XP96 plate reader with the standard program as recommended by the
manufacturer: three measurements per well were done (so for each gene 18 measurements were obtained
for both OCR and ECAR). After the measurements were completed, the plates were live stained with
Hoechst 33342 for 1 h and fixed with TCA allowing both a nuclear counting and/or SRB readout. Whole
wells were imaged using epi-fluorescence and the number of nuclei was determined using a custom-made
ImagePro macro. Plates were further processed for SRB staining as described earlier (Zhang
et al, 2011). SRB data showed a complete
overlap with the nuclear count so this measure was used for normalization. All values are normalized
to nuclear count. EOR for control and each gene knockdown is computed by dividing the corresponding
ECAR and OCR values. A two-sided t-test is applied to examine significant changes
between control and knockdown-induced EOR.
Authors: Min Wu; Andy Neilson; Amy L Swift; Rebecca Moran; James Tamagnine; Diane Parslow; Suzanne Armistead; Kristie Lemire; Jim Orrell; Jay Teich; Steve Chomicz; David A Ferrick Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2006-09-13 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Jae K Lee; Dmytro M Havaleshko; Hyungjun Cho; John N Weinstein; Eric P Kaldjian; John Karpovich; Andrew Grimshaw; Dan Theodorescu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-07-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Balázs Szappanos; Károly Kovács; Béla Szamecz; Frantisek Honti; Michael Costanzo; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Gabriel Gelius-Dietrich; Martin J Lercher; Márk Jelasity; Chad L Myers; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone; Stephen G Oliver; Csaba Pál; Balázs Papp Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-05-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Yinghui Zhang; Marja Moerkens; Sreenivasa Ramaiahgari; Hans de Bont; Leo Price; John Meerman; Bob van de Water Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Adil Mardinoglu; Rasmus Agren; Caroline Kampf; Anna Asplund; Intawat Nookaew; Peter Jacobson; Andrew J Walley; Philippe Froguel; Lena M Carlsson; Mathias Uhlen; Jens Nielsen Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2013 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Kyle P Feeley; Alexander W Bray; David G Westbrook; Larry W Johnson; Robert A Kesterson; Scott W Ballinger; Danny R Welch Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dongya Jia; Mingyang Lu; Kwang Hwa Jung; Jun Hyoung Park; Linglin Yu; José N Onuchic; Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; Herbert Levine Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Arig Ibrahim-Hashim; Mark Robertson-Tessi; Pedro M Enriquez-Navas; Mehdi Damaghi; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Jonathan W Wojtkowiak; Shonagh Russell; Kam Yoonseok; Mark C Lloyd; Marilyn M Bui; Joel S Brown; Alexander R A Anderson; Robert J Gillies; Robert A Gatenby Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Linglin Yu; Mingyang Lu; Dongya Jia; Jianpeng Ma; Eshel Ben-Jacob; Herbert Levine; Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; José N Onuchic Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 12.701